Member Info for news

Interesting discussion:

Why did the share price not react to the GGP RNS on Scallywag today?
[For example a jump in the share price]

>GGP SHARE PRICE ended the day at 1.12p [Mkt Cap £35.57m].
52wk high 2.25p and low 0.19p.

It would appear that the share price of 1.12p vs the low 0.19p suggest or appear that re-rating has taken place for the underpinned Haverion [per Finding the Motherlode Interview with Gervaise Heddle, CEO with ii, by Lee Wild, Analyst].

TRADERS & MOMENTUM TRADERS
We have heard from one momentum trader today and that he will not be buying until momentum appears. So, the share price marking time in a narrow range does not interest traders, momentum traders or so-called "rampies".

>GERVAISE HEDDLE interviews today at Proactive Investors, BRR Media etc.
There were quite a bit of new news which was instructive per Haverion, Scallywag, Clive Latcham that outlined what they projects were about and the strategic direction of the co.

<>CATALYSTS
The investment world sets the rules whereby there are definite catalysts needed before further re-rating [upward sp climb] to the next level of mkt cap.

At the current moment, the sp is marking time as it was in the days of Solgold initially from 1.5p to 3p level and then 6, 9 and 14p+. [1st stage] The 3p level took some time as it was waiting for Environmental permits.

It would be interesting to read what investors make of Haverion, Scallywag, Blackhills etc [Haverion licence] and Paterson Range East, also in the Paterson Province, W.Australia.

This is what is being said by Prospector - my take is that if every investor is reading it right and done research + insight to the value model, then we should be better placed. Its may be termed quantitative research & valuation models via catalysts.

Current topic of discussion on GGP.

Hence, what is the take on Haverion-Blackhills-Scallywag + Paterson Range East and more importantly what is the size of the potential project from the research of investors thus far?

The GGP said RNS of today, Tues, 23 Oct 2018 has also now traveled to MINING-JOURNAL.
Link: https://www.mining-journal.com/discovery/news/1349465/greatland-detects-copper-gold-at-haverions-scallywag#.W88dIiw81.yo.twitter [Section: Exploration/Development]

"Greatland detects copper, gold, silver at Haverion*s Scallywag."- Mining-Journal, 23 Oct 2018

Note:
Mining Journal: "World*s leading mining investment and business title."

The said RNS has also traveled to Morningstar, the USA reporting site.

Tells investors it is reaching all the mining community and beyond.

ago, Tues, 23 Oct 2018 www.mining.com/greatland-finds-copper-silver-gold-australia-projects-scallywag-target/

"Greatland finds copper, silver and gold at Australia project*s Scallywag target."- Mining.com

Note: News is now travelling to the mining community etc.

Gervaise Heddle Interview, Tues 23 Oct 2018 on BRR Media [Audio].

From the interview, what what I caught but please listen and check:

1)HAVERION described by Gervaise as "HIGH GRADE ZONE."

2)Scallywag - "SURFACE", 50m below surface. Attractive- LARGE GREAT COPPER SYSTEM -very interesting."

3) Copper, silver, gold and pathfinder elements etc.

4)Gervaise on Clive Latcham {recent Non-Executive appointment to GGP on 15 Oct 2018} : Rio, top executive team. knows how big major co*s operate {not sure major or money?]. HAVERION - relatively early stage- TAKE IT TO RESOURCE- FEASIBILITY STUDIES with ref to Mr Latcham- he knows the process and the people we need speaking to.

Comment:
Thanks to mickey1122 for the link. Rec.

Mr Heddle*s comment of "High grade zone" re: Haverion is new news.
So is attractive LARGE COPPER SYSTEM also new but one would think it was qualified with may?
Another stunner is the mention of resource and feasibility studies at this interview as we are at Hole 5 and maybe 6 or 7 at Haverion.

Please listen and check as hard to hear at parts and take notes.

"Greatland has multiple large magnetic anomalies similar in scale and size to Haverion - Scallywag results very promising." https://twitter.com/gervaiseheddle/status/105466002797212057 Tues, 23 Oct 2018 [RNS embedded within the tweet]

Interview with Gervaise Heddle, CEO, Greatland Gold today, Tues, 23 Oct 2018 re: Scallwag.
Link is within this thread with thanks to jupiternmars {Rec}

From the little I could hear so please check:

Interviewers commented it was mainly gold and copper and Gervaise Heddle mentioned silver and arsenic which is associated with gold & RARE EARTHS.

Asked about Hole 5 assays which is awaited, Nothing Yet

As for the appointment of CLIVE LATCHAM, Mr Heddle expressed excited and that Mr Latcham is ex-Rio with 9 years experience and worked with some very senior people. Mr Latcham knows what "CO*S WANT" at the "HIGHEST LEVELS", Haverion with ref: to Mr Latcham*s help with pieces etc = 3-4 yrs EXPLORATION, FEASIBILITY STUDIES.

Interview commented of Mr Latcham: A heavyweight.

Interesting interview as it mentioned FEASIBILITY STUDIES re: Haverion if I heard correctly.

Please check as it was difficult to hear in parts.

Tues, 23 Oct 2018 [GGP RNS on Scallwag, Haverion]

Going on the summation, it is interesting to lend some further observations namely:

1) From observation of the various co*s and more importantly the oft quoted chart of the LIFE CYCLE OF JUNIOR MINING SHARE {Link: http://goldseek.com/news/2017/7-20ps/ } "speculators" leave at the beginning of the "Feasibility" period [see chart].

The stage of "DISCOVERY" [1-3 years] per the chart is where the upward curve lies.

At the feasibility point [all the technical data needed for the resource etc], it would take 2-3 years per chart.

At this stage, there is the "ORPHAN" period of 2 years wherein speculators leave BEFORE the NEXT STAGE wherein the INSTITUTIONS ENTER = Full value, again per chart.

The share price has been holding at this level, within a narrow range. The advertised price is NOT correct as I have just tried dummy live quote.

Hence, why the share price that is in a range for quite a while now is of LITTLE INTEREST to MOMENTUM TRADERS [Mister Positive: "..and to buys just before MOMENTUM kicks in."].

Hence, why GGP in trading within a narrow range is not being so called "ramped" since it is of little interest to traders as well.

However, some of us old-timers have to wait it out on the forum from time to time or on Twitter where news travels fast and where the more seasoned gather these days as well.

Just to lend to the view of other types of investors and from the known life-cycle of a junior miner classic chart.

Tues, 23 Oct 2018.

From the Proactive Investors re: GGP RNS, Tues, 23 Oct 2018 RNS re:Scallywag.

Scallywag: "Similar in scale and structural setting to the HAVERION target."

"Consisted of SEVERAL ANOMALIES over a LARGE AREA of approx. 6KM BY 4KM."

With thanks to mickey1122 for the link. Rec.

boraki

Your post is recommended with thanks.

Greatland Gold RNS, Tues 23 Oct 2018 re: Scallwag, Haverion Licence, Paterson Province, W.Australia

Quote:
"Highest results returned from M>MI samping included ---2750pp COPPER..."

Per boraki*s conversion website provided:

"2750pp = 2.75g/t COPPER"

Please check.

From the GGP, Tues, 23 Oct 2018 RNS on Scallway @9.50am.
In essence:
1) "The grouping patterns of certain elements seen in the MMI response over parts of Scallway target are SIMILAR to those patterns seen in MMI & Drill Assays from HAVERION prospect."

2)"Gravity results from Scallwag show gravity highs co-incident with the magnetic targets over approximately 6KM OF S T R I K E."

3)"Elevated pathfinder elements DETECTED by the MMI survey support the view that HAVERION may be a IRON-OXIDE COPPER GOLD type system."

4)"Scallywag lies approx 6KM west of the Haverion prospects WITHIN THE HAVERION Licence."

5)"Further intepretation of MMI results from Scallywag will be carried out in conjunction with detailed aeromagnetic and ground gravity data to REFINE TARGETS PRIOR to----- DRILLING -----TESTING."

Note: The detailed MMI results vs Haverion can be read from the said RNS.

Please check.

Reference to Plappers post 7:15am, Monday of the above title.

"Massively, massively, massive. This is simply geological term relation to crystal size..reading it any other way just exposes the lack of knowledge some investors here have about basic geology, and the more complex mineralisation process. Duh." by Plappers as above.

Comment:
Since it was rather unspecific and there was NO further elucidation, I decided out of curiousity to look up page 1 of Plappers post.

This is what Plapper posted on 1 Oct 2018 which is the date of the Greatland Gold [GGP] RNS on Haverion Hole 5:

"TITLE: HAD005 - Like the sound of "massive" pyrite, chalcopyrite, pyrrhotite & quartz veining. For the non-geologist that*s generally a nice sign. A broad brush to say it but -large crystal structures often offer high concentrations ... Interesting to say the least." - by Plappers

Link: Page 1 - Plapper*s post of 1 Oct 2018 on London South East to check www.lse.co.uk/member-info.asp?nick=Plappers

Comment:
When 3 examples were given of co*s that had "massive" geo terms in their RNS to give a QUANTIFIABLE IDEA of grade, intersections, there was ho ha.

However, Plappers said today, Mon 22 Oct 2018 that the geo term massive exposes lack of knowledge. Yet, on 1 Oct 2018, Plappers had the above to say but did NOT want to elaborate "OFFERS HIGH CONCENTRATIONS." High concentrations is generally understood. So examples of high concentrations of pyrite, chalcopyrite, pyrrhotite, quartz veining?

That is the end of the topic of the 1 Oct 2018 GGP RNS.

Interesting - the 2 views on different days on the same topic and the term "Massive" in the GGP RNS was used by Plappers himself ie "..often offers HIGH CONCENTRATIONS."

On topic.

Thank you for your elucidation, Plappers on the GGP 1 Oct 2018 wherein you zeroed in on the RNS*s "MASSIVE" geo term in the context of chalcopyrite etc as per RNS.

Maybe, some of us who are interested only in the research side since work shared out is easier, maybe we could post on a separate forum under GGP 2 [Research]. I like reading research as it helps me form a more informed opinion. We await suggestions. Then, like minded posters can use this main forum ie GGP.

That way, we can read research posts on GGP and others who want to share only views etc an do so.

For example, I post on Hotcopper re:Solg as it is the mother co. In Australia, people only want the research as it helps them. They are not posting all the time unless there is new research or RNS.

Some people on this thread like research hence why I mention this otherwise people will say why no research.

I wonder if you follow GGP on Twitter.

Many of us are posting on #GGP on Twitter.

So, when people are so set on the Newmont JV for EG, it is best not to tell them otherwise. It was hard to follow this thread due to the upset and only when it settled down were people more amenable to Haverion.

I have not seen any junior exploration co into £150-£200m range if they do not own 100% of the discovery.
I personally at not gone on JV if 80% has to be given away. Example, Solgold rejected giving away 75% of their 85% of Cascabel and today, the co*s mkt cap is £710m @41.40p having risen from 1.5p @£8m mkt cap sometime at the beginning of their journey.

The share price of GGP has been trading in a narrow range for some time now and the mkt cap is underpinned by the Haverion prospect [per article: Interview with Gervaise Heddle, Finding the Motherlode, ii by Lee Wild].

When I posted the 1 para relating to the GGP 1 Oct 2018 RNS, TomE asked me what was it about. So I posted when asked.

I have been reading the forum from time to time and only when some posters asked GeoDave and he has not replied yet, I gave some research which has been in my note book. When the Hole 5 results come up, I have a DATA BASE to check.

As investors may be aware, David Lenigas*s Artemis in Australia took the licence next to GGP*s Haverion and in their RNS, Mr Lenigas commented on the GGP drilling results. How was he able to do this if he was NOT aware of ALL the drilling results at Paterson Province in W.Australia VIA A DATA BASE.

That data base in not available anywhere except by research. GGP*s broker note on their website ie First Equity quotes all the players in the Paterson Province region as GGP.

So, you may have come across my tweets on GGP as I have been active all this time.

The 6% holder of GGP, Stephen Beecham was keen to know when I posted the 1st 2 examples and I did say I always do 3 examples. So, I posted the 3rd example.

Anyone that has a view has to back up that view with data. On Hotcopper, they say to post a link or ref so that people can CHECK.

I checked my holding in GGP by clicking on the stock and it gave me my history when I first bought the stock at 0.35p days, so many are no longer posting here as regularly but on Twitter.

Hope that helps. I see some of the old timers on this forum eg applegarth. His posting no*s would tell he*s been around quite a long time as is mine. Onion from Australia who posted in earlier times is also on Twit and he follows me and I follow him for Aussie news.

So, that is balance. Thank you.

P.S.

Typo error: Not say but should read saying.

Often people dont research. When the results come out, they will need to see what the results are ie GGP Haverion Hole 5.

Everyone will be reading the same RNS and there will be the usual reaction.

From some examples of "massive chalcopryite, pyrite, pyrrhottie and quartz veining" one will be able to observe whether it follows the RANGE of other such descriptions.

If one goes to the Solgold website, one can see the Presentations will compare their INTERSECTIONS with historic intersections of big discoveries like Wafi Golpu and all the rest of the big discoveries. One will see the top intersections right to the bottom of the table of all the various discoveries.

Otherwise, how does one know if the find is big or major?

In the Liberum note on one copper co, they quote Solgold tonnage.

So, one needs to know all these benchmarks.

One has to have some idea BEFORE the results come out as to what one is looking for.

Those who "R" as one said, one will observe RESEARCH is not done.

So, benchmarks are standard for analysis. If one just judges GGP*s results in isolation, one will not know if they are as good or BETTER or worse than those in Paterson Province, Western Australia where Haverion is [GGP].

On Fri, one stock reported results and the share price fell from 1.55 to a low of 1.075, settling at the end of the day at 1.175p. The more seasoned investors with 50,000+ posting history interested in mining shares were nuanced straight away from the EXPERIENCE of having seen many such drills from other co*s.

11:41

May I kindly explain the post?
Investors could not understand the word "Visible Mineralisation" when the RNS came out say what is this visible mineralisation. Rio used this term via the article by Barrry Fitzgerald on the rumoured Rio big *un find in Paterson Province, W.Australia.

Then, the Haverion Holes 2-4 were not as exceptional to exactly the same degree as Hole 1 and the share price was affected.

HAVERION HOLE 5
We are waiting for the ASSAY results of Hole 5 expected in Mid-Nov 2018 and it was stated in the 1 Oct 2018 RNS of GGP: "GEOLOGICAL INSPECTION has CONFIRMED HAD005 has intersected Mineralised brecciated calcareous limestone & sandstone with MASSIVE pryrite, CHALCOPYRITE, PYRRHOTITE and quartz veining. Initial observation from HAD005 in CONJUNCTION with earlier results from HAD001 suggest that Haverion may represent a VERY LARGE mineralised system."

So the word massive is from GEOLOGICAL INSPECTION and associated in the same sentence with what was massive ie pyrite, chalcopyrite, pyrryhotite & quartz veining."

When the assay results come out for Hole 5, that would be a DEFINITIVE results ie it is confirmed by assay.

That also means that Hole 6, 7 or maybe even 8 [1 Oct 2018 GGP RNS said Hole 6 had started and the article:Finding the Motherlode-Interview with Gervaise Heddle by ii said that it will be 1 Hole per wk]. Someone said it may take more than a week if it is slightly deeper.

It has already been expressed earlier about the Holes after NO 5. From an example or example ie 3, one can SEE that NOT ALL the HOLES WILL BE SPECTACULAR. In the proving of a resource, the model will take in all the holes in composite.

So, for the investors, they should know what happens and how many holes other co*s drill.

Not many co*s report RNS with geological inspection of massive pyrite, chalcopyrite, pyrrhotite & quartz veining.

So, clearly one needs to understand what the drilling is about. Without examples, how can investors JUDGE in isolation.

By the way, from my posting history, I do not go from stock to stock. I was in Solgold from the early days and now one can see that Greatland Gold in a Tier 1 jurisdiction may have initial results that look promising.

Otherwise, when the results come out, what do they match it against?

How does one know the grades are good or exceptional as well as the intersections. In the said article by ii, GGP said they need to put in 24 holes in Haverion to find out whether it is a big find or MAJOR FIND.

On the LSE forum, only known for research.

Sun 21 Oct 2018.

contd
Part 2

where Greatland*s Haverion is located ie within the said El Paso Structural Corridor [per Antipa Dealers & Diggers Aug 2018 Presentation].

So, one has to look at the various examples wherein mining explorers use the word "MASSIVE" in their description of the mineralisation etc within their PR/RNS.

This forms the balance of reading from 3 companies.

I said that it is ideal to get 3 HISTORIC examples to get a balance. So this is the 3rd article.

In the Garibaldi article quoted Dr Lightfoot also quoted the HISTORIC Noril*sk.

It is common practice to study one*s own discovery in relation to Historic discoveries.

In looking at the results from Garibaldi, one observes that the various hole results are not the same and that there are HOLES that FEATURE.

One also wants to look at INTERSECTIONS of MINERALISATION in all the various examples.

In the case of Haverion, Chalcopyrite & Pyrrhotite, Quartz veining and pyrite was mentioned in relation to the word "massive" so one has to wait for ASSAYS expected 6 wks from 1 Oct 2018 GGP RNS to see where the MAIN mineral lies + others.

One cannot know until the results are out via RNS expected sometime in MID-NOV 2018.

However, I provided the article as investors did not under the word visible mineralisation used by GGP*s RNS. Rio also used this term and it has been posted of their Paterson rumoured find [ref: Barry Fitzgerald article}.

The latest 1 Oct 2018 GGP RNS also has the oft used term "massive" pyrite, chalcopyrite, pyrrhotite, quartz vein. So what is the meaning? One can see how other co*s use the terminology and their results.

GALIBALDI
I checked Fri, 19 Oct 2018 share price of GGI {Galibaldi Resources, Canada] - C$1.82.
Mkt Cap C$197 million
High 52wk C$5.27

PR, 3 days ago:
"Garibaldi drills into NEW ZONE at Nickel Mountain." - "Confirmed a 3rd discovery ..known as Central Zone..."
Source: Yahoo Finance.

It is normal to benchmark other discoveries to see the examples in STANDARD ANALYSIS.
So, on topic of HISTORICAL data [past].

Sun, 20 Oct 2018
Not editing due to eyestrain.

Ref: GGP RNS 1 Oct 2018: "GEOLOGICAL inspection has c o n f i r m e d HAD005 has intersected MINERALISED brecciated calcareous limestone & sandstone with MASSIVE pyrite, CHALCOPYRITE, Pyrrhotite & Quartz Veining .. Initial observation from HAD005 in CONJUNCTION with earlier results from HAD001 suggest that Haverion may represent a VERY LARGE MINERALISED SYSTEM."

Followed by GGP 15 Oct 2018 re: Clive Latcham, ex-Rio COPPER Chief [per Mining Journal description].

ANY EXAMPLE OF OTHER CO*S REPORTING "MASSIVE" mineralisation?
Grabaldi Resources Corp {TSX:GGI}
PR 20 Nov 2017 [In the US, its termed PR, UK: RNS]

"Discovery Hole EL-17-14 guided by successful earlier holes...entered MASSIVE sulphide mineralisation at depth of 123m and REMAINED in MASSIVE sulphides over 16.7 metres.

"Although ASSAYS from Hole 14 are PENDING, along with results from NINE other holes of particular potential SIGNIFICANCE regarding EL-17-14 is that AN EARLIER DRILL HOLE, 7.2% NICKEL, STRONG COPPER GRADES and a suite of other metals are now confirmed by SGS Canada in MASSIVE sulphides....in the immediate vicinity of EL-17-14 based on just received assays from the 4TH HOLE of the Nickel Mountain Program."

"Drilled towards the East..EL-17-04 cut 7.2% Nickel, 3.4% COPPER, 0.82g/t palladium, 0.4g/t Au, 10g/tAg & 0.195% cobalt OVER 4.8 METRES {approx true width} IN MASSIVE Pentlandite-CHALCOPYRITE-PHYRRHOTITE at a broader48.2 m interval highlighted by1.1% nickel."

"Dr Peter Lightfoot, one of the world*s leading nickel suphide experts and a technical ADVISER to Galbaldi commented:The high Nickel Grade of the ASSAYED MASSIVE sulphide intercept in HOLE 4, combined with the other assays as well as XRF analysis of sulphide Mineralisation in MULTIPLE HOLES supports a Nickel Mountain nickel tenor that is at the HIGH END of the estimated RANGE as per Nov 10.2016 news release."

From the article:
Hole 1- 2 long core intervals of disseminated suphide mineralisation totaling 176METRES.
Hole2-Significant intercepts included 18 METRES & 24 METRES.
Hole3-Intersected 13.5 METRES..within a broader core interval of 39 metres.
Hole4-as above.

Link: https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/garibaldi-drilling-tracks-nickel-copper-rich-massive-sulphide-conductors-to-new-discovery-zone-658784473.html

Comment:
One can see that Gribaldi Hole 1-4 drill, it was HOLE 4 that featured with other holes also taken into account by Dr Lightfoot. In the case of Haverion, it was Hole 1 that featured with 121 METRES @ 2.93g/t [gold] etc.

Gribaldi then went on to drill the NEXT stage with results from 9 Holes with HOLE 14 ASSAY pending.
In the case of Haverion {Greatland Gold}, HOLE 5 ASSAYS ARE PENDING at 239 METRES and description of "MASSIVE" in the above context taken from the Oct 1, 2018 RNS.

It would have been ideal if Rio Tinto released their gold copper find RESULTS/assays in the El Paso Structural Corridor, PATERSON Province, Western Australia where Greatland*s Have

"When I am not needed and want to watch the value of my investment grow .. and then when it gets to a point where shares will be dramatically higher, I want to be in a position to take SOME money off the table."

"Greatland *s come back again..it had a dip when Newmont pulled away from its project at Ernest Giles..but then it ROCKETED AGAIN when they found some nuggets at BlackHills...they also drilled HAVERION and FOUND A FABULOUS INTERSECTION..and now they are back in favour AGAIN."

"They*re now on the Cusp of MAJOR DISCOVERIES would drive their valuation even higher."

"Its time for me to be an INVESTOR not a director."

-Quoted from the horse*s mouth - Paul Johnson in a video interview + article by Proactive Investors on 23 July 2018.

Link: https://www.proactiveinvestors.co.uk/companies/stocktube/9928/investor-paul-johnson-on-aim-energy-metals-and-the-next-big-opportunity-9928.html

Title: "Investor Paul Johnson on AIM, energy metals and the Next Big Opportunity"- Proactive Investors,23 July 2018

Comment:
From recall of the interview, Mr Johnson said that due to his divorce bill and tax bill, he sold. On checking the GGP RNS*s on Haverion, I found that the Next Definitive GGP RNS was on 3 Sep 2018: "2nd drilling programme at Haverion." That was followed by the GGP 1 Oct 2018 RNS on Haverion Hole 5 initial results.

It is always interesting to read historic and post comments. So the GGP definitive RNS of 3 Sep 2018 and more importantly 1 Oct 2018 refers.

So that ends the current topic of Paul Johnson on this thread.

We have on official record what he said of his purchases. I also note the quote on this thread that the 5/10/17 GGP RNS said that Paul Johnson and wife "no longer hold a NOTIFIABLE INTEREST in the co." [ie co = GGP]

Mr Johnson continues to tweet about the various co*s and it was take quite a bit of check relating to his purchase activity post 5/10/17 hence further audit trail.

Suffice to say, that the end of Notifiable interest may not necessarily mean 0 holding.

Hence, why one needs to check and check what was said. That is balance.

Interesting what was said about GGP*s discoveries as we await further drill results.

Re:PJ comment

I just checked out of interest. On ADVFN, there are historic comments on PJ & Selling of GGP shares from 2 posters:
1) "temmujin" on 11/10/17 at 12:07 - Quote: "poor old paul johnson..lost a fortune selling too early."

2)"catstick" - "...he must be gutted he didnt wait a week." 11/10/17 at 12:12

Link: http:ukadvfn.com/stock-market/london-greatland-gold-GGP/share-chat?page=434

That is quite insightful.

There were no comments from London South East on the subject matter so quote from the other forum.

It would takes ages to do an audit trail so not attempting to pertaining to the P.J buys and sells of GGP and whether the timing was right or not.

Just lending to the discussion brought up on PJ*s GGP both as investor and from recall he brought in Gervaise Heddle from the video intereview I posted.

That*s all from me.

Just for clarity, the poster was looking at this morning*s price re: going south. I checked the price last night just before the close of the mkt closing and it is now currently close to the price today so far. It is trading within a narrow range.

All I was saying is to check one*s live prices via dummy so that one is more informed.

INVESTORS
The definitive will be on the drill results ultimately. Whatever investors read from it may be subject to volatility either way. As far as my research goes, I have done HAD001 & HAD005 as benchmarked.

The results will speak for themselves and if there is a gap between investor*s perception, the market will adjust accordingly as it may be open for external analysis and articles etc.

Best wishes to all as I await the results etc on the sidelines ie watch the incoming RNS.