RE: RE: You peeps voted for dilution2 Feb 2019 04:54
Eileen / TPT - stop the scaremongering tactics by saying the EGM calls are to get rid of your beloved Colin- to quote a saying I’ve heard before right now he has the best of a bad bunch and getting rid would do more damage, the time to get rid was when he was up for re election but most of the scaremongering went on then as well oh think of the SP, well guess what since then it’s been driven down to quarter of a penny. Anyways truth is the investor group is trying to drive some accountability of our BOD who are on mega bucks salaries which is driving fund raise after fund raise and yet delivering very little.
This is what I wrote as an input to the letter, you tell me where do I say that he should be removed? I keep saying colon needs to be accountable-
In my opinion we need to be very clear in what we are asking to then get some clear answers from CH so here goes-
1. Short term goals
a. Field license renewal
b. INA contract renewal
c. Increase in well output without permits
d. Well re entry permits
e. IPPC Permit
For each we need some clear guidance on plans, timescales for updates ie 1 month, 3 months, 10 years, that way then investors know how long to wait patiently rather than an open ended gravy train run
2. Long term goals
a. Croatia opportunities, what will the terms be, any deal like the Petisovci one where we take all the risk and the JV partner sits fat and happy is no partnership
3. Legal proceedings although we understand details can’t be given without effecting position timescales need to be given, what’s the action plan, when will formal engagement happen or has happened. What’s the terms of the legal advice?
4. BOD changes - details of remuneration of all current board members
5. Details of revenue forecasts for 2019.
6. Comparing number 4 and number 5 do you think this is commensurate of performance and current company position, are we simply in business to fund the BOD or actually expand and run a business and oh shock horror actually provide shareholder value??
7. Risk of the outgoings vs incoming revenue, how are we planning on paying wages without revenue coming in?
8. Ability to raise additional funds. The primary bid was a joke and a failure no matter how it’s dressed up, so what are the plans to raise funds if required? What is the limit to the boards ability to raise more funds through share allocation?
9. Overall the British chamber of commerce has tried to help with the situation apparently, however minister Jure Leben has used this to his advantage in our opinion and delayed the permits further. We are now on the 4th month I believe since Mr Lebens untimely intervention because of some tweets and emails accused to be shareholders, please ask Minister Jure Leben to provide evidence that these activities were linked to AST and to shareholders, if he can’t prove that then raise a case of slander against mr leben.