RE: M&A to trickle down to explorers and Condor3 Dec 2019 21:17
"On the up side, dilution would be minimised - that's clearly MC's priority, above all else. (Could this be one of the reasons why he (allegedly) doesn't get much respect from some of his peers? After all, this would move a lot faster if he diluted us to hell and back to raise the cash for either drilling or production...)"
EL, I have been pondering Beaty's comments about MC not being "the most well thought of guy in the world" over the past few days. In all my communications with him over the years I've had no reason to think less of him, if I did I doubt I'd still be invested here, in fact, MC is a large part of why I'm still invested here! He's always struck me as an honourable man, considered and meticulous. He always responds to my emails promptly and politely and I'm just a tiny shareholder here!
Why would Beaty make this comment, I thought... And exactly the point you make above kept resonating in my head! I imagined that MC's priority in avoiding undue dilution means guys like Beaty, Sprott, Rick Rule, etc who love to accumulate tons of cheap warrants might be only too frustrated when a CEO of a junior explorer says I want your money but I'm not going to do it at the detriment and expense of current share holders, especially when money in the sector is scarce! I can imagine he might upset people when he refuses to do what they think is reasonable if he wants their money.
Then again, I could be way off! I'd be keen to know what was behind Beaty's comment, at least from his perspective. At the end of the day though, MC has given me no reason not to trust him, both in words and deeds, and that's worth more to me than rumour and speculation.