Member Info for neredowell

Are investors losing confidence that the YPF judgement will ever be settled? From the dip in SP that would seem to be the case.

What impacts our share price? A big discovery, certainly. Floating new businesses as a result of a discovery? GMET hasn't done much for our SP despite providing shed loads of cash, why is that? If our junior miner business model is so great why aren't investors buying into it? It's a strange thing that our innovative business model isn't even fully understood by posters on this BB. If we have an innovative business model let's promote it to the rafters, make sure everyone understands it and our Company's vision of the great riches it will lead us to. That's where Sean and the POW board falls down they are unable to tell and sell our story. That's why we need a new enthusiastic CEO in the mould of PJ. He was able to sell the POW vision...sadly he sold it to me!

I agree with Donkey, lacklustre CEO and SP. can it be simply a coincidence?

What was the trigger for Burford's deletion from the MSCI?

I'm not sure we'll see a big upswing in the SP on the discovery of uranium:

It typically takes 10 to 15 years from the discovery of a uranium deposit to the beginning of mining operations. This timeframe includes exploration, assessment, permitting, and infrastructure development. I guess that on discovery Sean will be looking for senior miners to take a major share of the action. It's a sobering timescale. I heard it this afternoon on Bloomberg's "Merryn Talks Money" podcast, which was all about the nuclear power industry. Worth a listen.

To buy Ceres, shareholders would have to be willing to sell at these knock-down prices, and that would be plain stupid!

An endless list of wonderful things that POW is doing and money in the bank but still a dog share. Why can we see it and no other investors can? Admittedly, miners are generally flat despite the green transition demanding vast amounts of copper, lithium, nickel, tungsten, uranium and a myriad of REMs. I'm staggered that POW is such a poor performer and I can only put that down to lacklustre public and shareholder relations by our Company. None of the recent RNS has moved the dial. I'm going to hang on to my holding in the hope that something will turn-up...eventually.

Burford should be one company that tariffs have no affect on what-so-ever, fundable legal cases just keep rolling in, don't they?

Tray, How do you square an outperforming Company/CEO with a deadbeat share performance?

We may be uneducated but we don't invest our hard earned cash for negative returns year-on-year. I see all the positive news that comes in and this great looking bird just doesn't fly. Please educate me.

POW still has 19%.

Yes, you're right we need him at POW right now, talk about lacklustre SP performance! The share has everything but a buoyant SP!!

The uranium from the Athabasca Basin of Saskatchewan, will be exported from Canada, so, subject to 25% US tariff. I think this is why The Donald wants Canada for the 51st State, just like Greenland it's rich in minerals, metals and rare earths, it's just those pesky Canadians ( & Danes) that stopping them all being US property!

Anyone know why Goodwin's on a downward trend over the last couple of months?

This was posted on GMET's BB, looks like GMET has a proactive CEO. Sadly, it didn't stop there shares being down by over 5% today.

Oliver had over 20 meetings planned at Mines and Money in Miami with Institutional Investors, Family offices and high net worth investors. I am hopeful that as a result of Olivers infectious enthusiasm for the impressive GMET story he has to tell, we will see new US investors come on board in the coming days and weeks. UCAM have formally declared their 23% by RNS today following last weeks deal. It will have gone down well with investors that a Specialist Commodity investor has just come on board to replace POW as the largest holder by purchasing just over half of POW’s stake. Recently Premier Milton a UK Institutional Investor invested a further £750000 by way of a placing. The share register is looking impressive and contains what appear to be long term investors. So with not many likely sellers GMET is well placed to continue last years very impressive rise as the regular news flow continues. Looking forward to Olivers report about Mines and Money.

All of POWs very patient shareholders know all the wonderful things POW has to offer the savvy investor, everything apart from a buoyant SP. You keep saying that the SP is outside the control of the our CEO & board but what else do you put it down to? Masses of positive news, cash in the bank, arguably the best junior miner in the market, especially the AIM market and a flat and shaky SP. For me that's down to poor salesmanship and positive storytelling at the highest level of our firm. Other reasonable explanations gratefully received. It's one thing to make all the right mining and investment decisions, it's quite another to get that information broadcast to potential big investors. We are crying out for better PR!

"no amount of evidence will ever persuade an idiot" Surely for a growth investor (which to be investing on AIM you have to be and a bit of an optimist!) the evidence is the SP. The evidence is very clearly saying, why didn't we invest in something that generates a return?

If you look at the 5 year SP chart, POW has all the attributes of a dog share.

I think what investors are looking for is shareholder value. This could be the best junior mining business model in the world and POW can have mountains of cash in the bank but if these benefits are never reflected in a rising SP, why do we or does anyone want to hang on to POW shares? Since the consolidation a year ago the SP has been flat. Any good news that raises it runs out of steam quickly and negative news or just general market jitters sets the SP falling like a stone. I think investors are looking for a steady rise in SP based on our fundamentals, which are very positive. The issue is we're not getting that. The POW SP is just constantly underperforming. So my question is strong fundamentals, underperforming SP...please can someone explain WHY? If Sean and our bod cannot improve shareholder value then how is it going to happen?

Guardian Metal Resources plc

('Guardian Metal' or the 'Company')

Significant Trenching Results - Golconda Summit

High-Grade Gold Results From Trenching Programme Confirmed

New RNS driving up the SP of GMET: Guardian Metal Resources is pleased to announce trenching results that confirm and extend high-grade gold (Au) mineralisation at the 100%-owned Golconda Summit Project ("Golconda," "Golconda Summit," or the "Project") located in the Walker Lane Mineral Belt in northern Nevada.

Neither the POW nor any board of directors can control the SP, that's a given. So, what does drive the SP up and down. Normally, SP movement is put down to market sentiment, buying and selling. There are plenty of risers and fallers on AIM every day, but somehow POW doesn't capture investors imagination, they don't believe in our Company, its business model, robust financial health or the deals and exploration sites in our pipeline. I can only ask who or what is that down too? Is there more drum banging required from our POW management team?