Member Info for nemethv

Sorry but why (only) Redmond? Clearly Vlad as CEO must have known about this and so he's complicit as much as Redmond. It'd be fair to try to get him dragged out of the company and in front of the FCO (or preferably a f...ing squad). They're the same complicit.

And it would get me banned from this forum. But it's certainly very gory.

Because if something is off they have to issue a Hold and that's done with MD so they'd be told.

Look, if you are so anxious, consider putting your money into idk gov't bonds or something rather than something high risk like this? You keep questioning every move and motive of the company.

I'm very much a non-supporter of the current way the CEO doesn't give a fig about the share price however in his defence he does know about the patient's status because, while they're not in direct contact, if there was anything off they'd be told immediately by MD.

See that's the thing. It's not the evil shorters that push down the price (though as with any share there are likely some) but that the company still only releases news that focus on f...king over shareholders, rather simply saying "hey b...tches while we're at it we've already dosed the first patient and they are not unwell, great, right?". But nooooo.

I've been seeing that message on a daily basis for months and yet no actual proof of it. Market doesn't trust the CEO not shafting investors.

What was that about being so f...ing sure no small volume PH Special raises? And you lot all voted yes.

Oh please do us a favour and keep quiet then. You particularly were saying that the consolidation is here to make the share price less volatile and less prone to alleged manipulation. See how well that's gone so far.

They have nothing to say. Obviously they won't remove the incompetent leadership and there's nothing else they can do.

JHFH at risk of me being called a deramper you have to admit there is a good reason why LTHs don't trust Vlad's financial decisions, especially when it comes to not f....ing us.

So if at the end of the year we're not significantly down, I *might* believe for one he's not a d..k. (and yes, he might be in for the science, but investors aren't.)

Tbh, if he doesn't need my (PI) money, then he won't get my PI vote. Simple.

We're mostly here to make money, not to save the world.

And I'll vote no for the second resolution regardless. Vlad might be a decent scientist but a f..ing poor businessperson and I'm not rewarding him with my vote

Considering how little the CEO cares about the actual shares/holders even if it was successful I think he'd be willing to sell the company for £1 if it helped science. And f...k all the shareholders while at it.

Problem is I personally don't believe a word he says so I'd rather not give any money till I see him out.

I understand that a lot of people are here for the scientic potential of HEMO and I genuinely don't wish to argue with that. I would love to see the company being/becoming able to do the things it's hoping to achieve but for myself I'm here because I want to see the investment value rise and for me the science is a secondary item. I get it that for many others it's the other way around. Feel free to call me selfish.

Vlad seems to be counterproductive to my personal goals but to be honest if his actions keep de-valuing the company and the sentiment I think in the longer term even the ones with an eye for science will become unhappy because raising (otherwise necessary) funds will become increasingly taxing on everyone.

Politely ask Vlad to kindly GTFO and hand over to someone competent?

> should dispose of all rubbish in the green bins provided.

The BOD you mean.

Where did you read that btw?

You mean just because the bod occasionally says something along the lines of "magic might possibly happen one day in the otherwise completely undefined future" the sp can't actually go even further down the drain?

I'm somewhat doubtful there has been an influx of new investors over the past some time (I'm not saying there have been none before anyone suggests that I am). I do however think that most people that still have eua stocks are either LTHs (who may have averaged down) or shorters. Otherwise the SP would be higher due to demand.