Member Info for NAV_Mike

I would wager that it was a buy, given that the larger 200k trade had gone through 10 mins earlier and drooped the price. Trouble is, if they were both delayed, who feckin knows

I dont think Ive ever seen a share so totally at the mercy of rogue MMs - they must wet themselves laughing at their abiliity to shaft people who buy shares in SAR

Yep the price being paid is gradually increasing and no dastardly delayed trades showing up so far

Now its a question of how big is that overhang....

Volume isnt high, but the AT boys (and girls) are active again today - constantly hitting the bid if it tries to rise a bit

Contrasts noticeably to some days where there can be barely an AT trade in sight

Nope other way round 400k off book and 2.1m UT

Quite a large UT I will admit, but its not a straight sell - its the price at which most buy and sell orders can be matched off. Looks like sell orders had the upper hand, but they found ready buyers none the less

Perhaps they saw the oil price slipping a bit and cashed out. 2.1m is a larger than average UT but by no means panic selling

Agreed AB, but as always we cant know the full story until any da mn delayed trades show up

Probably some kind of linked £20k trade like cash and new, or cash and ISA, but in Sareum world could be delayed sells that held the price back today lol

Well something has spooked some larger holders today. Perhaps technical chart based selling?

Some 'big' trades that look important, but even now its still not even half a million £ worth transacted

Well you can now buy at the placing price should you so wish.....being offered 12.5p by AJ Bell

AB - I get that, but it was just the way they announced it, as if it was some kind of endorsement

Probably me I guess, old enough to remember different times

I just find it very disingenuous that SAR management announce the institutional investor coming on board, only for that insti to instantly push a large portion of those shares back into the market

Are we expected to believe that management have been taken by surprise by this action?

Well PM effectively torpedoed the share price by telling everyone little would happen for two quarteres, so he owes investors more than vague crumbs of possible new business

The market has 'bottom-drawered' SEE and that is resulting in a daily drift lower

....and there we have it 12.50p bid

No one with the placing shares is getting out with a profit now. God I hate AIM

I wish I could be poritive (as I topped up last week) but this has the feel of a MM plaything at the moment, and possibly being walked down to the placing price, just becase they can.

The majority of sell trades are round number trades (the unknowns at 08:30 are sells imho) which makes me think the market is being fed by the shares from our spivvy insti

I hope Im wrong, but as I said last week, its amazing how quick they can eliminate any positivity in this stock

If that comment was directed at me, I am disappointed because when I see an "institutional investor" has taken shares in SAR, I rather hoped its investment timeframe was greater tham 24 hours

That was the reason for the 'spivvy' comment

Well in the space of 24 hours, all the upbeat talk from yesterday morning (despite the placing) has been replaced by the usual talk of uncaring directors and rip-off companies.....

You just gotta love the spivvy instis and ruthless MMs who inhabit AIM. (well at least they allowed us 3-4 hours of positivity yesterday morning) lol

It never ceases to amaze me how easily the market manages to totally snuff out any positivity in Sareum. Yesterday we had the biggest burst of buying in ages, and what has been the end result....nada!

In this instance our supposed "insti investor" looks to have turned "spivvy investor" and bailed out of several million

End result, all momentum gone and we sit here forlornly waiting on news again

Aaaaargh!

Currently showing 14.16 - 14.225

Because of this buys may incorrectly marked as sells

Okay.....dumb question im sure, but why would an insti be so averse to issuing a TR1? Time? Cost? Secrecy?

Apologies for any rank stupidity!

I refer to my earlier comment today when I womdered what SAR's definition of an insti-investor was?

You could say that pondlife like Riverfort were instis?

As with all things SAR, all news is never 100% good. I guess the insti involvement wasnt the ringing endorsement we hoped for

Trades all done at exactly the placing price so hopefully it was indeed forward selling and nothing more nefarious