Member Info for NaPoM

Can understand the regulars still here coz they are underwater just like me. But the likes of you, dont quite understand why you care to post on a stock that you claim you're trading for a measly 10%....cant see the logic in it.

Do u work for a broker acker?

What is it about prem that fascinates u acker? 100% of your posts are about prem and yet u claim to be a trader. Doesnt make sense to me. Plenty of stocks out there specially covid stocks that have bagged many times and yet you are still here - claiming to trade prem for 10%.

Still working in double glazing acker. You're clients must get confused....they probably wouldnt know if you're buying or selling them windows following the way you trade prem. In fact if you're a trader, how come u never comment on any stocks?

Acker just wants a bit of attention thats all. Lockdown must be taking its toll on some people. Can get lonely at times.

According to a recent RNS acker

"Currently exporting up to 10,000 tonnes lump ore per month at better than 35% Mn;"

Can only use the information given at the time.

GR based his calculations at $5 per dmtu. Actual price is at $6. DYOR

Take no notice of acker. He's harmless.

https://www.jupitermines.com/projects/tshipi/manganese-price-information

Shaw river sold to MNH.

Looking forward to seeing the first batch of wolframite concentrate from the tailings operation.

Sorry friday not yesterday.

Photo on twitter was from yesterday. Meeting was about the tailings production at RHA and MNH directing operations.

Or these guys from Ireland
https://www.solocheck.ie/Irish-Company/Mn-Holdings-Limited-171520

MN Holdings Ltd - Maybe its these guys from link below. They are based just around the corner where I live. lol
https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/05374112

Deflecting from the question coz you dont know the answer and pulls out the hunting lodge as well. Thats ok Steve. Move on.

How do you intend to verify it without physical evidence?

Ok, to verify it you basically want prem to drill existing open pit sites and get an independant report to check that the deposits are there? Ignoring all the work that's gone on before that and overlooking the fact that they are already extracting the ore.

Also, MNH estimates that data only represents 35% of the total deposit within the mining licence area within EPL145. There are 3 other areas that they havnt explored yet covering over 60,000+ hectares. (EPL3539 - 17,581 ha, EPL3538 - 30,329 ha & EPL3456 - 16,214 ha). Are these just made up as well?

That 8 year old info was used to find the manganese deposit which are now being extracted via several open pit locations. What other proof do you need that the actual deposit is there? They have historical data, JORC compliant and physical evidence of the manganese ore.

Next thing you'll be saying the photos of the manganese mine, plants and machinery are not legit either.

For your info Steven, visit www.cubeconsulting.com. This is the company that did the resource statement in 2012.

So you're basically saying that they are not legit?