FT9 Sep 2015 08:35
U.K living wage: on the battlefield: You may not know it, but one way or the other you are taking part in a three-way fight. In one corner of the triangle sit a company’s customers. In another sit its suppliers (largely — but not only — the staff). In the third sit shareholders. All want to extract as much as possible from the company in the middle. Seconds out, round one. In the U.K, the referee has intervened in the fracas. The chancellor, George Osborne, announced in July the introduction of a so-called living wage — staff over the age of 25 will have to be paid at least £7.20 per hour from next April, rising to £9 by 2020, against the current minimum wage of £6.50. A victory, surely, for the staff. Customers and the shareholders will hurt. On Tuesday there were the first indications of just how much. Whitbread, which runs Costa Coffee shops and Premier Inn hotels, employs 42,000 people on hourly wages. Of them, 16,000 are in line for a pay rise under the new rules. That will add £15 million-£20 million to the group’s £460 million annual wage bill. Whitbread plans to offset the increase by improving efficiency and passing some of the higher costs on to customers in the form of price increases. In this case, the minimum wage starts to look good for the staff, bad for the customers and neutral for the shareholders. The shareholders were not so sure though — Whitbread’s shares slipped 2%.