Member Info for muldoon96

Certainly a lively start to the week !

So, we had a delightful close, but what might that mean for Monday morning ? Another fall back, or now we have consolidated a bit will we move higher again ?

1.55/1.60 ! Why didn't I buy more at 1.30 earlier ?! I was hovering over the buy button but then I thought 'what if it falls further' ? Thanks, lloyd88, roger65 and avocet123 for instilling FUD into me.

Whether the bottom is behind or in front of you or even to the side for the gender fluids amongst us, no-one is going to pile back in if they think it may have further to fall.

They will be a major holder, but not a majority holder.

I can't see why it would take all day to fill this so-called 'buy order' for 2.8 million shares ? There have been numerous sells of over a million today, so you only need 3 of these and the MMs can fill the order !

Lloyd, so you don't like GST, and you don't even like GDR where you post a lot. Is there anything you do like, or are you just a professional moaner ?

Well it's surely not a buy at 1.3p, the lowest priced trade of the day ?

Funny how both roger65 and Lloyd88 are both overwhelmingly GDR enthusiasts, and have just appeared here this afternoon. Looks coordinated to me.

10p is not outrageous - it gives an Mcap of only £170 mill and there are many mediocre companies out there in excess of that.

Yes I think this share is now being traded rather than simply bought. So plenty of ups and downs, but can't see us breaking new highs until we enter May.

I thought we were a copper miner ?

Sorry, 1.6 !

It seems to have difficulty breaching 0.6 at the moment - always drops back. Hoping it doesn't drop to 1.4s again as it did yesterday.

Invst21, your link doesn't work

Is past a strong buy ? Dont understand. So you think it is no longer a strong buy ?

Goinglong's GST post on 20 Feb when sp was 0.335 :
"Big boys playing the game as per....major dumps to come to light come the end of the day."

Must admit, this wording from the RNS "However the settlement is following the path of consensual due process" doesn't exactly state 'we will be getting the diamonds'. Its the consensual process that bothers me - maybe the government is proposing a settlement a little less favourable than before and VAST is being leant on to accept it. We should not need a 'consensual process' if we are going to get the diamonds.

Schalfenplanet hasn't posted on any board since November last year.

Ah, didn't see second RNS