RE: Re Base 1116 May 2021 15:14
Dominic Frisby Money Week
When it comes to taxes, the tech giants – Amazon, Google, Facebook and Apple et al – have for over a decade now made Western governments look like fools.
Heck, even Starbucks has.
Their globalised business models, with IP here, trademarks there, profits somewhere else, have meant that they can pretty much pay as little or as much tax as they see fit, and there is not a lot governments have been able to do about it.
Tax systems, bound by national borders and designed around the physical economy, have been exposed for the antiquated megaliths they are. Local individuals and companies have been burdened with heavy taxes so that governments can subsidize their out-of-control spending. The globalised digital behemoths on the other hand have got away almost scot free.
Well, if you thought governments were unprepared for the disruption brought to their revenue models by the tech giants of the 2000s and 2010s, wait till you see how unprepared they are for “decentralised autonomous organisations”, aka DAOs.
I’ll bet you less than 5% of government ministers even know what a DAO is. Nevertheless, the 2020s will be the decade of the DAO.
When “Satoshi Nakamoto” designed bitcoin, one of his key aims was to create a money system that had no central point of failure. Previous alternative money systems, he argued, such as Digicash and Digigold, had failed because there was a central company, a central office that could be shut down. Once this central point was shut down, the system came tumbling down with it.
So, intrinsic to bitcoin’s design, was that the system functioned on a distributed network – on multiple computers in multiple jurisdictions around the world. You might be able to take out one or more computers or nodes on the network, but you couldn’t take them all down. And it is the combined power of all the machines operating on the network that makes bitcoin so formidable. A government can make bitcoin illegal, but the computer power required to take down the network is so immense that it is almost impossible. This was Nakamoto’s blockchain.
Cont