RE: Barrick Employee Swap --> Tibbs25 Jan 2022 19:37
Sppon ,
If you recall the main reason that Centamin decided to develop outside of Egypt was due to the mining code at that time.
Since then the Eygptian mining code has changed considerably and making development of new mines very attractive for Centamin and others!
I am informed you need good grade in Western Africa to pay for extraction there. There is such a thing as an African cost structure and it is relatively high!.
To that you need to add the security risk which is increasing annually with the fundamental islamist insurgency. Sure, the comment below about forfeiting 1.4 million ounces may be true, but are they economic ounces? It may well be a case of preventing throwing good money after bad money.
Funny how often people believe that management makes decisions unfavourable to the company and, by extension, them. From recent actions it seems that Centamin management has decided to rather focus away from West Africa with all its problem back to Egypt where they have a strong foothold, existing government relations, knowledge of the geology and it being a country with very little historical exploration.
So it seems prudent instead of risking share holders money on developing resources that may be far better sold to others .
Wanadoo
Apparently its history goes back to 2011, first advanced by a company called Ampella Mining, which was acquired by Centamin in 2014, which was seemingly mostly interested in the Konkera and Batie prospects. I did a search for “Wadaradoo” on Centamin’s website and it does not even pop up. That is how unimportant the prospect is for Centamin. They do give a resource for Batie West of 2.11 Moz at a grade of 1.17 g/t all in Indicated and Measured category. The project is classified as Non-Core, which does not surprise me given the relatively low grade and its location. In the October corporate presentation of Centamin Batie West does not feature. The downgrading of the project came soon after new management got involved.
Wadaradoo is apparently now owned by Altair, which states in a corporate presentation dated October 2021 that the resource is 1.4 Moz at 0.95 g/t Au, even lower grade than Batie West. I have not found any details on this prospect and have no information about the type of mineralisation (oxide versus sulphide, amenable to heap leaching, prospective strip ratio, etc.), but suspect it is pretty mediocre to worthless. Why otherwise would Altair’s market cap. be currently only US$5 million, including having another project? Apparently the market also does not see much value in the project. Maybe some attache too much credit to the statement in the Altair corporate presentation that "Feasibility level projects in West Africa: "Typically $300 million to $400 million valuations”.
This statement's generalisation is questionable. Value is determined by size, grade, prospective strip ratio, dilution, metallurgy, etc. There is no such thing as “typical” for mining projects.