RE: RNS8 Feb 2022 11:03
Schomosport from 2018
Posts: 11
Off Topic
Opinion: No Opinion
Price: 119.20
RE: Re Complacency
Today 20:45
In general I find this forum extremely informative and am most grateful for those such as MrT who agitate on behalf of shareholders and bring back information directly from the Company. I would however like to say a few words on the topic of the sudden loss of the single drilling machine.
I know very little about mining however I do know quite a lot about reliability, dependability engineering, contracting for availability, etc. which is the gist of the discussion regards the absence of a hot standby replacement for the single drilling machine. Fundamentally it is a cost/risk decision where in almost every case in every industry, management will ignore the recommendations of risk engineers and trade cost NOT incurred against the cost of what MIGHT be incurred if the risk comes to fruition. Sometimes management get it right, sometimes they get it wrong, often massively so, BP Macondo being an example of the latter.
So I am not even a little bit surprised at the predicament that arose when a single critical equipment item failed and bought production to a halt. Saddened, cynical, disappointed, world weary but surprised, no, it happens all the time. Given that a new machine has now been ordered it would appear that management have also concluded that they got it wrong as they have ordered a replacement. Hopefully they will extrapolate the argument to other single point failure parts of the production process, but don’t bet on it. People do not like spending money mitigating risk!
As to the wails about penalty clauses, liability insurance, contractor should pay for loss etc.; forget about it unless you want to add two noughts to the contract price. And spend years in court fighting for ‘victory’ at every twist and turn. Centamin management don’t appear to have been overly successful in this arena with their own government I note. Sorry, that sort of a world doesn’t exist and, if it did, nobody would bid for it, they all want to be like these companies who think they can experiment in running a railway at a profit and then give it back when it goes tit’s up. Dream on.
You might also like to ask the contractor how many times he has been encouraged to delay preventative maintenance just to get a little more output out to boost the month end figures. The contractor always agrees of course as its customer’s risk. That sort of mentality doesn’t do much for reliability either!