RE: Diesel fuel disputes17 Jan 2023 09:26
I had thought there may be more questions from other retail share holders on this, but possibly the announcement of the ratification of Law 32 which null and voided the unresolved court case of over 11 years was so overwhelming that the withdrawn diesel subsidy seemed unimportant?
However just in case anyone should be curious find the managements rationale or explanation below why it would have been been impossible to recoup the $375m due to an administrative error in an Egyptian court!
Centamin had been paying the full rate and has been since it was brought in. The full price has been factored into all forward forecasts. The recoup of $367m (which did not happen of course) was at the time of the 2021 annual report (ie end of 2020).
If Centamin had lost the case they would have had to have paid $26m. In view that the case was simply dropped, no-one pays anything to anyone.
Re Profit Share with EMRA, they get 50% of the free cash flow generated from Sukari (plus 3% royalty), but growth capex is then removed (over 3 instalments of 1 year each), so cost of fuel does not count, nor does labour, nor other input costs.
Hope this helps
Tibbs