Member Info for MrRipley

Yes Im an imaginary builder. I could have picked any job, but I decided my dream was always to build houses. You should see the schlong on my unicorn.

Wow great story crowfoot. It rose nearly 600% and you didn’t sell.

This isn't even remotely the same situation. It’s a chemo delivery system not a completely new drug.

I read that article on the BBC website. It’s a very very long way off and is helping around a quarter. If AVA6000 only helps a quarter I’d be very very worried. We’re trialling a commonly used chemotherapy drug with our delivery system attached. That’s the difference between ours and other treatments; we’re improving (or hoping to improve) what’s already in use. But as Timster said, there’s a phenomenal amount of drugs in trial.

Oh and had a look at your posting history…. I’d go away now.

Reported for being boring.

Soup.

The attempts to bash me aren’t working. The anger comes from my countering your ridiculous deramps. I’m here to stay.

I only ramp or deramp……. That makes no sense. What’s your reading age pal?

Ooohh well done Watching. You know it doesn’t count when it’s just £50k written on a torn open Coco Pops box though? Your helmets got your name on it mate.

He’s a complete failure.

https://mobile.twitter.com/Stockonomist/status/1278427604295565318

https://sharetipstersuncovered.wordpress.com/2015/01/02/is-tom-winnifrith-the-biggest-loser-ever/

https://sharetipstersuncovered.wordpress.com/2015/01/02/tom-winnifrith-and-the-missing-100000/

Level over 3 months….. this is simply FUD bllcks

It’s a UT. It’s completely irrelevant. It’s never once opened at the UT price.

Not necessarily if they are in talks already and they have an eye on data which Avacta will have to hand up to now.

For ava3996. That’s what I believe is coming next.

This is the Sex Pistols.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=yqrAPOZxgzU

Agreed. Next time consider it before you decide to hound the life out of me on the other board and I won’t do the same back to you. I’m much better at it than you are.

Not a green box then? Hahahaha! What did you say about credibility? What a tool. Eh…. You want so watch what your saying, I found the link to you abusing nurses online during the pandemic.

Please please please dear lord let an RNS of a takeover land for Eve. Put this loser to bed.

Of you go to the local park with your Bottle of White Lightening again then Geeeee-I’ve-got-nothing-left-man.

Lots here have said we need a funding update/licensing deal and we need data. It’s been discussed to death. But when you come out with “good news won’t bring a rise”, how do you expect posters to see that?

“I did not miss your point riply, you are making a assumption that the SP will rise on the back of good news.

However, the news has been unremittingly positive for many weeks now and yet the SP is near the bottom of its months long trading channel. This SUGGESTS (thats all), that the market has already priced in success of ava600 part 1.”

And that’s how you FUD

So you think that the release of positive Data won’t lead to a rise? What about a licensing deal for AVA3996? What is the data? How effective is AVA6000? If there is a licensing deal then how much is it for? Since the market knows all the above and has it priced in, then go ahead and tell us all.

And if you believe a raise is coming and good news won’t do anything, then why do you claim to hold? You’d have absolutely no reason to at all.

Completely missed my point there Dacia. My point was people exit a trade for fear of dilution, when it could come (and is likely to come) after good news. So they miss out on a positive rise to avoid a 10/20% drop thereby missing out entirely.

Thanks your expert opinion though. Now toddle off back to the EVE board to carry on spreading the fear, even though you didn’t follow your own trading advice. Geeeeeee-sus-I’ve-lost-all-my-money-man needs his hand holding. So run along.

Agreed RAH and Bein. My point was that I don’t understand the AIM fear of fundraising when the purpose is solid.
But yeah, I can’t see it at all. It’ll be voted down without data.