Member Info for MrKnowall

At least they're not appointing gravy train directors (yet) like other companies I follow do, while their BODs twiddle their thumbs

What's so clever? Why didn't Alba have someone on board in this role prior to developing the company's policy? It sounds like a gravy train job. Forget the mark up .. ALBA is proving to be a disappointing investment. Too passive for me on reflection. Too many eggs in one basket.

Big deal ... board appointment. A red herring. The share price wants to go south. Why?

The Board has been teeing us up for ages now. City meetings organised ahead to bring on new investors are no substitute for supplying concrete evidence, say hopefully, one to be announced in detail today, unequivocally stating that their well talked-about ARCM investments are at least worth the current share price, or hopefully are valued much higher. The longer the delay - then the more doubts emerge, creating a deteriorating situation capitalised on by MMS. BOD give us a blockbuster.

A complete ****** collecting his P45, I hope. He's not a shareholder. Join the role queue SS

Everything this bloke touches turns to s..t, not gold. As I suggested weeks ago in any normal walk of life this bloke would have been thrown out on his ear for incompetence. And here he is trying to refinance his gravy train. The FCA, or what they call themselves these days should be investigating sub par organisations like this. Corporate governance with UKOG is about zero. Anybody agree?

How drones could be employed to reduce losses at sea. Apparently the RNLI is looking into this. How does could save lives at sea .. is the relevant article

Ok spot ... you claimed earlier that there are better companies on AIM to invest in. So name them if you're that sure. If they turn out to be star investments then you'll get one hell of a following. I would have to eat humble pie

SPOT has to post something negative regularly or else he won't get paid by his master

Spot .. are you the same alias -- on duty and adopting another name - paid for by market makers/ betting shorters etc. ...appearing on particular sites where negative plays are under pressure? Obviously you will say -No. Without being able to confirm it, no doubt your questionable English language proficiency replicates itself across many sites where there are positions hoping for a fall in a share price. Spot, I think you might be flogging a dead horse with this one. Tell your masters.

How is my old combatant? Still defending that slumping share price? I thought Dr Kevin - what's his name -was some kind of a seasoned expert. I've seen his photograph. He's just a mere schoolboy. No wonder investors have been sceptical! In4... are you just one of his classmates? Still in short trousers?

I still can't reconcile the situation. Last year SS gobbed about how wonderful BB was, and how it would become the new flagship for UKOG. On the back of this - expert's - view, the share price subsequently went ballistic. BB has ended up as a damp squib. Either this guy SS was telling a porky, deliberately (FSA investigation?), or he was incompetent in his judgement. In most other walks of life by now the equivalent of SS would have been sacked. His advisors are in a perilous situation too. Corporate governance with UKOG is a continuous farce. And yet SS survives these issues, and on a nice salary too, to make things worse. Walk man! How can you look yourself in the face in the morning on your record so far. Anything you say now in public nobody will believe. Do the decent thing.

In "the old days" tip sheets used to have profound influences on the prices of those shares tipped. I include Sunday newspapers in this category too. It seems to me nowadays that these promotional vehicles neither exist nor have a minimal impact on share prices. Simulating that balmy era AERO may have rated then as "a classic recovery situation," with hopes of a turnaround reflected in a surging share price.. Oh for the old days!

To me the share price looks raring to go ahead, any day

Got a favourable mention in GUN's interim report 50 mins ago

I reckon these "sells" just priced just below midway 2.50 -. 2.80 are in fact "buys." The same thing happened with GUN yesterday.... I was a buyer recorded as a sale. ARCM looks as though it wants to go north, despite our resident bear on the site having nothing to say good about this company. Some people will say anything negative on these sites if they are paid for posting downbeat comments constantly, as part of the agreement with their masters. These people can't debate issues - they are programmed with one view from their financial supporting base. I expect a rebuke from Mr Negative, the person him (her) self, probably getting a bonus payment for being quick on the reply. (Notice I'm being politically correct with the him and her inference. Nothing like being "with it!")

But for the Dow being in "collapse mode" this share would be motoring on today's positive RNS on top of that released days ago. A similar muted response came a few days ago to excellent news with GUN. Once markets steady I expect both shares to head north.

Nice "suck ups" at 4.41

.. moving up a treat

Biggest mover up today so far should attract attention. The uninitiated might just read the RNS's and get converted.