REMINDER: Our user survey closes on Friday, please submit your responses here.
HH discussed in Share Watch. A start at least for a publicity drive, but they go for ALBA rather than the other participants apparently.
corrected .. not has
...also there HAVE to be problems, not have!
Typical teenager. English grammar like most things,, gone to pot
Have you had your first shave yet?
sleight of hand actually .....
Here, here
You bet?
Precisely
He's a loser
Should the spivs get horny following a successful outcome for Horse Hill, then our share, and those of Egdon Resources and Union Jack Oil might have "two days in the sun" on the prospect of Holmwood becoming an oil bonanza too.
During this brief period of enthusiasm share prices would likely soar to levels exceeding then sensible current values. Next reality would probaby kick in ... a decent response, but a retreat to lower share prices as the future was assessed.
Best not to be on holiday should this happen.
Until. then a modest accumulation might be worthwhile. Eventually those Lincolnshire council ostriches with their heads in the sand will be forced by HMG to submit to our companies pumping oil in that county for the good of the country as a whole.
When the penny drops on both issues these shares could be like gold dust
UKOG ... corporate governance ... near zero
Insider trading ... rampant
Stock Exchange regulation .. near zero
If the man in the street dropped some litter .. an on-the-spot fine would be deemed acceptable.
Here, if having been given insider information on a placing, participated and "advised" on future announcements on which to make a nice turn, the individual or body says "Thank you very much." No questions asked. Bad luck everybody else.
It makes you wonder whether or not the regulators have a hand in the till too, here, and across many AIM shares.
How come I as a UKOG shareholder never had the opportunity to participate in this gravy train too?
No wonder our country is experiencing an exploding crime wave, both physical and fraudulent. This country will eventually get it's just desserts .. all IMHO
Decades ago I lived in Canada and traded on the Vancouver Exchange. It was like The Wild West. Regulation there seemed non existent. What was that?
UKOG would fit in nicely there. Our regulators seem as bent as anything corrupt on this planet. Somebody lifting a packet of sweets from a supermarket here would feel the full force of the law. On the other hand deceiving shareholders on a continuous basis .. insider information liberally spread out amongst equally culpable pals ... could be rewarded with a knighthood.
Rights issues to let all shareholders participate in "the action" has become taboo, although I concede the fact that for some dynamic activities a rights issue can be too slow. But one big rights issue to clear the air would have been nice rather than this piecemeal activity occurring in the shade.
Hi Riddler. I bought at 0.75p in November. All this damper/deramper talk doesn't hide the fact that the shares aren't performing in the way I had hoped. Since then, anouncement after announcement hasn't improved the situation. So what's going wrong ... or at least not right? There must be some underlying negative that the average pi investor is unaware is my only conclusion ... unless proved otherwise of course. Like all bulls of a share I want the price to go higher. Showing concern is in no way being a deramper. Best wishes
No offence Miller but you seem to be talking in riddles.
Hear hear!
At least they're not appointing gravy train directors (yet) like other companies I follow do, while their BODs twiddle their thumbs
What's so clever? Why didn't Alba have someone on board in this role prior to developing the company's policy? It sounds like a gravy train job. Forget the mark up .. ALBA is proving to be a disappointing investment. Too passive for me on reflection. Too many eggs in one basket.
Big deal ... board appointment. A red herring. The share price wants to go south. Why?
The Board has been teeing us up for ages now. City meetings organised ahead to bring on new investors are no substitute for supplying concrete evidence, say hopefully, one to be announced in detail today, unequivocally stating that their well talked-about ARCM investments are at least worth the current share price, or hopefully are valued much higher. The longer the delay - then the more doubts emerge, creating a deteriorating situation capitalised on by MMS. BOD give us a blockbuster.