Member Info for MrKnowall

What worries me is that weeks before Broadford Bridge, when the share price was falling, TW suddenly got on the
bearish bandwagon, and in so doing accelerated the share downturn then.

You might not like it, but TW was right. Broadford Bridge did not live up to the euphoria that SS had famously heralded earlier. UKOGs share price moved sharply lower.

Now we have a further drift downwards, and TW is suddenly becoming vocal on UKOG boards, encouraging his bearish opinions and adding to the current underperformance.

IS THE SAME MOLE ACTIVE RELATED TO BROADFORD BRIDGE, TIPPING OFF TW ABOUT SOMETHING WIDELY UNKNOWN AVERSELY AFFECTING HH'S PROSPECTS?

If I'm wrong, then SS do be a man/female and exert your confidence and authority, telling ALL shareholders about what's going on at HH, positively, I hope.

If there is no statement from you, or a bearish one ... then you're dead meat SS

Moving onto the main market would permit many institutions to take up new shares to fund UKOG's advance towards big scale production.

If shareholders reasonably content with the magnitude of their holdings built up over previous months acknowledge that the chances of adding more at lowish prices are remote, then expect action. They'll want UKOG's share price to rip away, sooner rather than later!

It wouldn't surprise me that they'd feed the likes of The Daily Mail on Saturday or its sister paper on Sunday with a well scripted version of the huge potential of The Weald Basin ... its impact on the UK economy etc. ... and above all on the undervaluation of UKOG's share price. It would make good popular reading selling the idea of our newly established oil wealth pre a BREXIT deal.

Press coverage not guaranteed to happen just yet - maybe a week or two out, but just a thought.

Having read the article I apologise for having alerted you.

Factually it's so incorrect, it's embarrassing. A clumsy ramp, and nothing more. HH doesn't actually get a mention

HH discussed in Share Watch. A start at least for a publicity drive, but they go for ALBA rather than the other participants apparently.

corrected .. not has

...also there HAVE to be problems, not have!

Typical teenager. English grammar like most things,, gone to pot

Have you had your first shave yet?

sleight of hand actually .....

Here, here

You bet?

Precisely

He's a loser

Should the spivs get horny following a successful outcome for Horse Hill, then our share, and those of Egdon Resources and Union Jack Oil might have "two days in the sun" on the prospect of Holmwood becoming an oil bonanza too.

During this brief period of enthusiasm share prices would likely soar to levels exceeding then sensible current values. Next reality would probaby kick in ... a decent response, but a retreat to lower share prices as the future was assessed.

Best not to be on holiday should this happen.

Until. then a modest accumulation might be worthwhile. Eventually those Lincolnshire council ostriches with their heads in the sand will be forced by HMG to submit to our companies pumping oil in that county for the good of the country as a whole.

When the penny drops on both issues these shares could be like gold dust

UKOG ... corporate governance ... near zero
Insider trading ... rampant
Stock Exchange regulation .. near zero

If the man in the street dropped some litter .. an on-the-spot fine would be deemed acceptable.

Here, if having been given insider information on a placing, participated and "advised" on future announcements on which to make a nice turn, the individual or body says "Thank you very much." No questions asked. Bad luck everybody else.

It makes you wonder whether or not the regulators have a hand in the till too, here, and across many AIM shares.

How come I as a UKOG shareholder never had the opportunity to participate in this gravy train too?

No wonder our country is experiencing an exploding crime wave, both physical and fraudulent. This country will eventually get it's just desserts .. all IMHO

Decades ago I lived in Canada and traded on the Vancouver Exchange. It was like The Wild West. Regulation there seemed non existent. What was that?

UKOG would fit in nicely there. Our regulators seem as bent as anything corrupt on this planet. Somebody lifting a packet of sweets from a supermarket here would feel the full force of the law. On the other hand deceiving shareholders on a continuous basis .. insider information liberally spread out amongst equally culpable pals ... could be rewarded with a knighthood.

Rights issues to let all shareholders participate in "the action" has become taboo, although I concede the fact that for some dynamic activities a rights issue can be too slow. But one big rights issue to clear the air would have been nice rather than this piecemeal activity occurring in the shade.

Hi Riddler. I bought at 0.75p in November. All this damper/deramper talk doesn't hide the fact that the shares aren't performing in the way I had hoped. Since then, anouncement after announcement hasn't improved the situation. So what's going wrong ... or at least not right? There must be some underlying negative that the average pi investor is unaware is my only conclusion ... unless proved otherwise of course. Like all bulls of a share I want the price to go higher. Showing concern is in no way being a deramper. Best wishes

I like your sense of humour p00rman ...

No offence Miller but you seem to be talking in riddles.

Hear hear!