RE: First green eml box8 Jun 2022 16:58
Two things DShox, firstly you acknowledge’no risk no reward’ and then dismiss that there’s any risk at all. Secondly, look at the time frames between the authorities receiving the completed ESIA in the first instance and then being told the water treatment plan wasn’t up to scratch. It was a matter of a few months. So the authorities were not just able to ratify the ‘other’ aspects of the ESIA in that time but, they were also able to assess that EML’s water plans weren’t appropriate.
Now, compare the timescale between the re-submission and up to now, where no indications have been received.
Why? It’s a simple question and the answer isn’t Covid, Ramadan, the Kings signature, changes of government etc etc etc!