Member Info for MrJinx

And…you mention 90 days. Not a cat in hells chance. This now opens the door to another potential 2 year wait.

ideas; i agree, it’s a welcome rns. however, during this whole process we’ve been led to believe that the decision to award the esia would be taken at ministerial level. not once through this whole charade were we told that ministers would/could just knock it back to the local level. clearly graham clarke has not got a ******* scooby doo about what’s going on.

Just go back a few weeks on either Tilly’s or JHFH’ postings. You’ll see they listed deals from $4bn - 100m….if memory serves me right

@Darwen68… they made millions by forward selling so don’t feel bad for them.

Mrs India: it’s blatantly obvious that the choice to keep schtum, is borne of the necessity to not incriminate themselves. What would they say that wouldn’t get torn to pieces under the most minimal of examination? Vlad isn’t to be trusted. The only comfort that I see as a pi is that they’re now limited to issuing ‘only’ 60-70m more shares over the next twelve months. There are of course two ways out of this restriction; cancel the listing on the main market and move to AIM or, they produce a prospectus. Either of those would of course be big massive flashing red lights to private investors.

what you’re describing jhfh is a lot like the ‘soundings’ that just anally *****ed us.

The email may well be genuine, however the content is far from sincere. The profit made by the capital raising company is distant from whatever sector the company trades. If Vlad/Hemo had allowed the share price to climb post CH lift, then the placing would’ve been at a higher price and the Capital raising company would’ve still got their 100% or more profit. There’s only one reason to raise at the time of the CH lift AND at this level, and that’s to purposefully dilute existing shareholders. No more, no less!

Not sure if they’ll allow a full web link but it’s on the FCA website. Some light bedtime reading for you;

https://www.fca.org.uk/publication/primary-market/pmb-30-technical-note-exemptions-requirement-produce-prospectus.pdf

So some sort of security for us poor suffering pis, anyway.

if hemo issue more than 20% of dilution within the next 12 months, they would need to produce a prospectus. so none of the shady **** that we’ve just seen and what happens on aim. producing a prospectus is public and investors can decide what they want to do;

a) 20% exemption

under the prospectus regulation (p reg), issuers who are admitting securities fungible with securities already admitted to trading on the same regulated market that represent less than 20% of the number of securities already admitted to trading on the same regulated market, are exempt from the requirement to produce a prospectus (which relates only to admission to trading on a regulated market but not to public offers). the 20% limit is applied over a rolling 12-month period. as such, any securities admitted over the previous 12 months not covered by any other exemption, would count towards the 20%, except as provided otherwise by the p reg.

Only by what posters have stated recently, Hemo can only issue 80m more shares over the next twelve months., to avoid the 20% limit. If they leave the main market and move to AIM, then that’s a warning sign we should all take notice of.

Vlad is not ‘sincere’. Good god man, you’ve been here years, a lot more than I have, and you still can’t see it. I’m not emotional. My average here is less than the current s.p. Like most people should have, when those half million sells started popping up on the day of the CH RNS it was obvious what was happening and I sold a big chunk. Stu may well have known the RNS was going to be today but he didn’t four weeks ago, but he knew there was a raise coming, and he told you. I knew there was a raise coming because of the selling pattern and because I don’t trust Vlad, and I told you. Yet you chose to ignore the warnings. That’s not Stu’s fault, or the shorters, traders or anyone else fault.

JHFH…you’re kidding, right? Vlad didn’t succumb yesterday. He’d succumbed, if indeed he had and is just not also culpable in this whole crooked saga, before the CH was lifted. Why do you think millions upon millions of shares were forward sold on the actual day of the CH lift RNS? Why do you think they continued to be sold down into the twos up to yesterday?

1. Stu is not to blame. He’d been warning us of a placing for weeks, just like he did before the last fundraising. Those who tried to discredit him are more culpable.

2. Vlad is a chancer and has no conceivable empathy for p.is. We all know this. You ignored this at your peril

3. The millions upon millions of shares forward sold should have been a lighthouse on the rocks for everyone. Again, if you ignored that, it’s nobody else’s fault but your own.

4. Never trust a single word that Vlad writes, says or intimates. His behaviour in any other occupation would have him labelled as crooked. I know this is the same as ‘2’ but it needs saying again.

Lol…Simonthezealot - You called it right? Hahaha! After you sold and took your £150 profit, the Clinical Hold was lifted and the share price more than doubled. Numpty :0D)

…and maybe you shouldn’t have invested your life savings? Just saying…

It confirms a few of those but not all, MrI.

what a load of old ****e. the s.p will move if random people want a 50/50 gamble and buy, or they sell because they’re fed up waiting. and if the esia is awarded, it’ll rocket. not because it’s a support line or if there’s an elephant pattern crossing a mud flap spiral. just because it opens back up the whole project. honestly, great work and i’m sure it took you some time, but i seriously don’t see why you bother. not for eml anyway

@Aghmir, as much as I feel your hurt about your father, how was TestPack supposed to know your father was deceased? Your response was a little over dramatic don’t you think?

Musk…not to be a pedant, but…a couple is 2, a few is 3