Member Info for MrHumble

Reports don’t have to be nasty . Just factful

Example say somebody says it’s underlying current value is 2.8p

And then they go through cash flows and the position of a company just prior to each raise etc. Tie it in with actuals and so on

I see no need to call the CEO a liar

Just have an ‘RNS and other sources ‘ section

Point out RNS content v verbatim statements elsewhere , but in a pro style . Full layout

Value: 2.8p

Cash flows: period x to y

Actuals : x to y

RNS number: xx [….paragraph….]

IM transcript : […paragraph…]

Then forecast modelling would follow

No need to analyse it. No need to express opinion. Public not dim. Can work it out for themselves . Just show facts . Done

Tbh I’ve seen at least 500 different style reports on any entity though.

But point is, they are taken seriously

You can professionally be a proper c*** , without being one at all. Simply presenting data

Then follow it up with cash flow charts, raise labels, the future sell prices etc

😂

But imo one report makes not a castle. Variety must exist and so 1000s are better

I think the public should take part as well, anonymous reporting and opinions etc

Separate journalists and civil reporting

Far better than forum crud really

And it’s always out there in the future , the matrix in searches but more importantly, when know how, the AI feedback as well really

I must go now. No point in me highlighting various impact things, and then being on a forum.

You must all learn to differentiate between ‘impact’ material v basic liquidity hunting for gerbils - material

The latter only has ‘impact’ when you fall for it

GLA

Nothing woild stop 55000 ‘journalists’

But what would stall the public? Ah

Maybe ‘psychologists’ ? Exposure?

Don’t worry about that. Iceland

😂

Next:

Why should reports be restricted? Why can’t the public be taught report structure? And write company reports in any they like? Or civil ratings ? Or indeed srticles?

Why a closed shop? This is wrong. It needs throwing open to everyone

This is the future

No more bi yearly or annual updates or maybe a broker notes every 3 years

We all want this weekly but always from different sources.

And pure professionalism … no discussions. No replies

Simply reports in the matrix for ‘research’

Happy days for PIs

The first thing to consider in market, is what actually has impact ?

Broker notes

Reports (Sachs style)

Truly, not much else is of interest in market impact terms bar accounts and a couple of other things

But what if impact statements contained key data? And key things like CEO words pre s cash raise dnd post a cash raise etc? As part explanation to broker rating price ? Things like that

And how do you get market to treat everything as if a broker rating or fund report etc?

That rules out articles etc etc

I’m not sure. But I reckon the yanks know how. We just haven’t seen it here yet

Now what if 55000 journalists decide on those formats? And not articles and so on ? (Leave those to the general public)

Guys, personalities don’t matter anymore . Nobody cares about personalities. All irrelevant

Market cares about impact

This just needed many to be retrained in the art

Took a while

😂

Re Obsesian

—I remain freely accessible, for reasons I’ve made perfectly clear.

Point in case. Looking at the focus, it’s just a method to try engage a rider audience that’s not possible behind paywalls

Look, I am known to be very generous. I’m going to show you all how to engage a global audience - without saying 1 word (meaning not one word from me )

This is very common really.

No defamation stays behind paywalls you know. It does not serve the true purpose

‘Protect the pay cheque from a plc’

However, what if… 55000 journalists go for the jugular ?

Busy psychologists …. Looool

But a lack of sophistication is a great market aide . It helps you to not call buy on SBTX for years

Here is the real psychology behind ‘The Psychologist ‘

No point attacking people behind a paywall. Nobody sees 😂

A buy loool

Show you Monday. Right now , hilarious watching Trump clap Putin

I see Opti got more offloaded to the average downs

I’m fairly sure anyone that looked in here over the past 5 years must think we are all dim?

It’s difficult to argue with it

Not even a business here to look at. Not sure why any of us are here tbh

Lols like everyone has taken a punt in most things pre Alaska meeting. Not my cup of tea

A good maker would know it. But not as necessary these days really. Algorithms know it now.

There is only one psychology in markets.

And it’s a secret …

‘ Hence, the use of a pseudonym is not a whimsical choice, but a necessary measure—to protect both the organisation….] (SBTX) 🙈

Appear at…

I’ve gone through various sources to see what careers appeared on SBTX since 2020

Only astronauts left. Apart at 4p I suppose

Fair play.

Why did you get the psychology behind the stock wrong a few weeks ago?

I’m sure the organisation are happy not to be represented 😂