Member Info for MrHumble

I was also assuming they were all buys. But then I looked elsewhere, and realised, they are not buys at all. But in fairness, they were not registered as buys anyway

So tempted to buy. Don't know what is holding me back. I could regret not being a part of the massive retail excitement , next week

Formula's, numbers and in general, markets - not my forte. I think 200% means pretty sure

Big buys stagnated at 22s and 20/19s as well. Pretty sure we are just looking at deeply discounted stock appearing whenever it likes, on L2. 100% is pretty sure?

As a newbie I am going to stay on the side-lines, and try to understand why price did not drop lower, in hindsight - next week

No mates rates. I did some research and found that the previous circa 15 or 16 million raised, had great stories as well. Makes me a bit hesitant.

This really is all just too good to be true, beyond an AIM blag. Everything went perfectly - Research complete years before standard research (record time for Sederma I think) . All of a sudden, a revolution is taking place - via an AIM stock, with the AIM build up template to match - and al before CRDA likely gets demoted?

When it all seems too good to be true - it generally is true?

Currently, at what SP is CRDA demoted? Typically when it occurs, you see a lot of change on boards. Best to feather the nest now? In any way you can?

The real question is: How can naivety and timing always be aligned? Once? Maybe. Twice? Pushing it. 11 times?

I am just shocked given the history of AIM, anyone thinks a fund or seeder etc, would even look at ASIM on a par risk with PI's. But just opinion. I hope nobody minded that. GLA

Net, You do NOT need risk-on growth over time, when you back any little cap via a raise. You just need 1 RNS - a spike - job done. Then leave the stock with a broker like OPTI did, for the constant return. No work, no stress - share price irrelevant. Fixed return (literally). .Liquidity over time, no issue.

It really is that simple. Salary and expenses cover for a blag. You may not like price falling, obviously, But it really wont matter to them

Wont profit from a rise either. Just liquidity creation for the fixed return

Ive not got 40 years personally. But i do know of a few with 50+. 14 HNW's i know (sort of) , but not in the UK actually. Multi millionaires - the stocks they were in, on the floor or delisted since. They all made risk free millions. They openly told me they simply paid the salaries via raises (States), for a blag to lock in at X price and sell over time. Practically risk free. Of course, that wouldn't happen in the UK of all places, esp AIM. So maybe bit of a conspiracy

Oh Brierwood? Why? I already don't think he is an idiot. If i did, id simply think he was too dim to protect profit. No conspiracy in that. Just common sense, or none. That's his business.

Email who?

It says in my book for newbies, it is very common in illiquid caps. Hard to just dump it all at x price. So lock in return and do it over time

Be a bit of an idiot if he did not really? I do not think he is an idiot

Fair enough. I did not claim i could bring anymore to the party, than anyone else has since August 2018. Was just an opinion

Just wondering but was there anything to stop Brierwood from long covering at 27p and fixing his return, no matter what share price does? I don't see why he wouldn't be allowed to. Can in bigger markets. Only prudent to be able to sell even 1p and make same as if 27p

Seems to be an awful lot of filtering and reporting going on here. DO you not think one narrative only might simply fool people? Like it has for years

Lol