Member Info for morefondle

not updating the shareholders about the true state of affairs with the company the BOD cannot be accused of being economical with the truth. On the other hand, it says a lot about their abilities to run a company in an efficient manner protecting the assets of the shareholders and promoting their interests.

On the 6th Nov I posted ;- 'I see the OilyKerpunker has come sneaking back to this BB after repeated tantrums where he would say that this was it and he wasn't coming back - EVER. Still I do miss him when he disappears for a few days. Good fantasists are hard to come by and we should treasure the one we have.' Just goes to show that the ancient Chinese proverb was correct - Be careful what you wish for because you might actually get it.

I see the OilyKerpunker has come sneaking back to this BB after repeated tantrums where he would say that this was it and he wasn't coming back - EVER. Still I do miss him when he disappears for a few days. Good fantasists are hard to come by and we should treasure the one we have.

the Oily Kerplonker.

The cost of some dodgy shares on AIM - £200 Value of those shares when they delist - £0 Having fun at the Oily Twonkers expense - Priceless!!!

that all but one contributor to this BB have accepted the situation with good grace and written it off to experience. Whereas that one contributor who has whinged, whined, wailed and moaned for over 7 months has resorted to gloating over their so called 'victory' when that 'victory' includes losses that probably exceed those of every other poster on this BB. Is this what they call thinking outside the box. Or is this the thinking that puts you in the box. Anyway whatever the answer is our Oily contributor could have redeemed himself and covered himself in glory if he had just turned up at the AGM with his barrister as he said he would. There again if you have lost hundreds of thousands of dollars and are living in a cardboard box ( that's where the thinking gets you) affording a barrister is a bit problematical.

lark all wrong. Here is what the Oily Kerplonker wrote on the 15 Aug 15:- '..... so much so that I bought over $500,000 worth. I've made it clear that I believe that they misled investors and made egregious misrepresentations. I have Michael Young on audio recording from investor conference calls telling us how great Uytas was and how much it was worth by itself (north of 20p), and then even telling us one time that he had some good news because Uytas was bigger than initially expected. I invested hundreds of thousands of dollars due to those comments and the presentations. Then they tell us Uytas isn't even commercial. WTF. The whole thing smells like a great big scam. It looks like a giant ponzi scheme to me - no doubt about it.' So you plunge in to an investment believing all the hype you are hearing and if oily is to be believed lose large amounts of money. Then when it all goes t**s up you can claim you were the only one here that new what was going on. Makes my £200 punt look very small beer but at least I went in being aware of the risk.

to see that Oily Kerplonker is still posting on here. Given the tens of thousands of pounds he claims to have lost on this company I was a bit worried for his sanity and was fearful of his doing something foolish. Mind you it makes you wonder about his sanity when he has spent the past seven months trying to save us from ourselves with advice about a share that was suspended. Oh well I suppose it keeps him off the streets and that means he is not frightening the horses.

Welcome back and do you realise just how worried people have been. The Water Mitty Hunters Club was thinking of submitting a missing persons report. So be a good boy and never ever do that again. Now how did your barrister get on st the AGM?

have contacted me to inquire about our resident loony. There has been no word from him for 10 days now and this is giving cause for concern. They are worried that he may have crashed his private jet in to a building of one of his many businesses after having drunk too much champagne from his privet cellar.

In his defence he is probably correct to use that spelling of 'sole' because who else but a fish would listen to his demented ramblings. Unless of course he is talking to the underside of his shoes which would be quite acceptable as long as he did not share his thoughts on here. As for using the word 'wraith' this is probably explained by his shadowy, will-o-the-wisp existence.

gave me a message for you Oily. Seek professional counselling and whatever form of abuse you suffered in your youth should be reported to the appropriate authorities.

In the words of The Bard, "Methinks the Lady doth protest too much"

As someone who took a small punt on MXP and incidentally SER I drop in here from time to time in the hope of some good news. In so doing I noticed a similarity in OilSpelunker's style and the style of someone called jonjo who posts on SER. I then noticed that while jonjo, with one or two exceptions only posts about SER OilSpelunker only posts about MXP. This of course aroused my suspicion that these two are one in the same person who trolls BBs to wind people up. I therefore subjected samples of their writing to Language Style Matching software. The result is given on a scale of 0.0 to 1.0. These two samples produced a result of 0.93. I leave you to draw your own conclusions.

OK oily I have seen that bloke down the 'pub again and he informs me that after reviewing your postings on this BB they are unable to confirm that you have Waltism. This is obviously good news however they did say that they detected another interesting development. His words not mine. The team were wondering if there are any other BBs that you post on so that they could follow this new line of enquiry. Just let me know on here and I will gladly pass the details on to them.

"Was it a giant Ponzi scheme? You be the Judge.............." Well I can't really say since I am not qualified to judge such things.However if it was it was assisted by paid stooges or plants on this BB. Consider these three extracts from what appear to be blatant attempts to ramp MXP. "Not saying that 10p is not realistic at some point. 23 Nov 13" "------but I can see 15 - 20 million 2P. If we burn through the debt and keep 20 million 2P, that's still worth a buyout of 8.5 pence per share at today's float and exchange rate." 5 Jan 14 "Where do you chaps see Max if we finish developing what we have shallow wise, go to FFD on each find, and then stop all exploration expenses and chop admin down to nothing? 7,500 - 10,000 BOPD with no X expense. EBITDAX would be quite impressive. With 15 - 20 million 2P we should be worth $300 million with no debt, which is about 8p per share with cash flow of $150 million/year, all not counting NUR1. Or we could pay ourselves huge dividends." 28 Jan 14 Now I wonder who posted those little snippets?

Are you saying that you are the Walt of whom I speak.

I've recently commented on the negative and deceptive comments made by a Walt that was hiding in plain sight. So far, nobody has been able to write so much as a single controverting sentence in response. I shall, therefore, consider the deafening silence as a ratification of my theories and ideas, and will remain at peace knowing that we all agree on my views of Walts. Under the circumstances, such a conclusions seems acceptable and reasonable. I think that there is nothing more to say about this until I see that bloke down the pub and find out what he thinks of what he has seen on here.

I met a bloke in the pub the other day who is actively involved in a project that is researching Waltism (Walter Mitty Syndrome). As you may well imagine I immediately informed him that our resident Walt would make an excellent case study in a laboratory rat sort of way. However if the subject of the research is aware of what is happening or suspects that those around him knows he is a WALT then the validity of the data being collected is compromised. Nevertheless this bloke did say that the MXP BB certainly sounded like an interesting place to gather anecdotal evidence in support of the project. If I bump into him again I will ask him what he thinks of what he has observed on here and what conclusions can be drawn of poster's behaviour. All strictly anonymous of course.

Collect up all the hot air expelled (from both ends) by a WALT in to a very large (humungus) bag. Purchase a wind farm. Position the bag in front of the wind farm and allow the hot air to be released in the direction of the blades. Guaranteed income for many years to come.