We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
The fact you pull figures out of thin air with nothing to back them up, tells me a lot.
Not only are you a champagne socialist , you are a pretentious one too.
Highly inlikely you subsides me.
I earn over the level of being a net crediter to the economy and have never taken a penny in benefits. So no matter how rich you think you are, you are not subsidising me.
Anyway this is getting boring now. We live in a democratic capitalist society.
Feel fee to take your left wing ideology and go live in China or Russia, I'm sure they we love to have you.
A clue way Britain is not socialist.
Because the democratic voters dont bl_ody want it!
Fact check
You need to pay 35 years national insurance to qualify for the full state pension (previously 30)
You need to pay nothing to be a lazy worker shy parasite and get every benefit going.
By the way; people contribute to their own pensions, work shy contribute nada.
I suppose that's why the rest if the world is in trouble, because Labour was not in power.
Clue about the incoming finacial stress, covid 19 stimulus ( which was very nessasary)
I think Billionaires will be more worried about asset price destruction than anyone.
You could also make sure people on welfare( which is the countries biggest expense by far) can justify being on welfare.
It's funny how from the late 1970's through to the Blair years we historically had between 2.5 and 3 mil unemployed.
We now have full employment. Even a huge shortage of willing workers in some sectors. This even after 0.5 mil Eastern Europeans here ( who do work)
Either we had an economic miracle in recent years or far to many Brits get used to life on Benefits.
If you ask me it's the work shy that harm this country far more that the rich.
If you want the NHS properly funded, get people using the welfare state as a pay check off and back to work.
You confirmed my comments.
Don't be so sure that is scaremongering.
You will be amazed at what the next Labour government will do to the "rich" ie anyone who owns anything.
The trouble with filtering is, if said person posts 3 or 4 messages in a thread and people are responding, then the thread becomes non sensical
Solg tend to bury sub standard drill results. They end up on page 15 in the small print in future RNS's several months later.
If they have drilled something and you have not heard the results. Trust me they are not worth hearing.
I would pre for them to pay down the debt before reinstating the dividend.
They need to eat into this debt pile pronto, then we are off to the races imo
££££€€€
Try telling sadiq Khan.
I can no longer drive my 20 year old car to visit my elderly mum without paying a ulez charge. I do 4k miles a year. If I had a new 4x4 doing 25k a year that would be fine.
The argument seems to be around BHP not paying a decent price, ie no low ball offer because of the so called diverse book.
Most companies seems to over pay for take overs. BHP are obviously going to say they are not over paying for anything. Everyone would do that.
The reality is if you never pay the going rate for something of value, you will most likely never get anything of value. Applies to buying a mine just as much as buying a house or a car etc.
Simple supply and demand economics
You won't need a link for today's presentation, it will be a rerun of the last 10 just look them up on youtube
SP going in one direction until funding is sorted.
Message to board : get finger out and get a move on pronto.
I don't think the Ecuadorians will be in the least bit interested in where the investment money comes from.
They are not custodians of western interest in metals or rare earths.
They are an emerging economy and like all others will not turn down chinese money. I think some are over thinking this.
What we don't know yet but should find out soon, is what the Japanese are planning.
What's changed for cornerstone?
They treated Nicks first offer with distain, now they want to merge. What have I missed? From there point of view
Maybe the strategic review will make others look silly