Member Info for Moljen

Just to be clear a previous RNS from July 19 said ...
The new equipment should enable MNH to increase the mining rate, and annualised production is expected to target throughput of 220,000 tonnes lump ore, or not less than 7,7 million dmtu of exports by the end of 2020
Unfortunately Napom with Prem you can't believe anything put out in an RNS - after all these years there's only yourself and one or two others who actually believe any of the BS.
PS - before you get all sulky from where I'm sitting people have no choice but to nod through the share increase because the alternative is worse at least with the lights on there's still a chance for people to trade their way of this car crash but as an investment proposition that's a different matter altogether

Nearly as stupid as to what many will consider to be your totally erroneous and obnoxious post just made - sure there are many hundreds, if not thousands, of people who missed out on seeing realties / friends dying because they followed the spirit and letter of the law. Sure they'll be so pleased to hear the fox outsmarted them too.
Why don't you report your own post for being particularly grotesque and keep your political views to yourself when your presentation is so offensive.

I see some of the twitter brigade are all excited at 10,000 tonnes - for a sense of realism a quick reminder from 9th and 12th July 2019 are available on Prems website with the $1M loan and MNH presentation.
The funds were to enable MNH to reach 10,000 tonnes by end Dec 2019 and here we are numerous months later and are nowhere near.
Celebrating abject failure thus far is probably why so many are underwater with this Company, if you have management who are incapable fo delivering on their own forecasts then you really don't have an investment what you have is a traders dreams.

Inan - see you're responding to type and missing the entire point and summary of the video. If you think I'm going to dissect every single word and phrase to massage your sense of self importance I ain't as have far better things to do today. However just for you here's an article by a couple of Phd students with numerous Phd references to cell repair. How about you go and ask them and tell them they're wrong also, sure they'd love to hear from you. Ta ta for now have a good day & hopefully after mine I'll see some sensible discussion from one or two of the posters who I can communicate with.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5664224/

That's its Ray - was talking a half life of 3 months meaning up to six months potentially to expel all.

Morning Ivy, just asked on the other board whether either your or Bermuda could watch the video and give your views as both of you seem to have a grasp on science and are able to explain it to us Accountants in words we understand.

Nope Inan - what he was saying is the virus enters the out wall of the cell but unlike HIV doesn't then enter the cell DNA. Honestly little point you theorising on something you haven't yet seen. Why don't you spend 25 minutes watching it and then comment and it'll save me having to post every few minutes.

Crumbs, think you have that wrong. Not a case of being unaffected rather the antibodies did their job but it can take months and months for the previously infected cells to be completely expelled from the body. The antigen test still picks them up during this period but the virus is dead as a dodo. Very very different - your scenario is HIV type virus this one looks as though it isn't. Perhaps you watched it late at night also so possibly worth rewatching.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uATMbGK__Tg - laymans terms Inan but he also gives you all the links to the raw data for the study

Late at night when watched it so apologies for not putting it all down in one post but the other last thing from the Korean CDC and this study was that the virus is a slow burner for mutating which again is even more good news.

And for the more science amongst you even in people who had a low antibody count the results then found the body has some super memory cells and if the virus is reintroduced these supper subs come along el pronto and kick start antibody production. It is seriously good news all round and I for one am pretty happy with the Korean CDC for quality of data and how the study was conducted.

Inan - not sure that was what the report was saying. What is was saying was that the virus RNA can remain within the lung cells and take several months to be completely expelled after it is has been neutralised by antibodies. What they were more worried about was whether it could be like HIV or Hep and basically reactivate at some future time - it won't. Nothing to do with viral load in my understanding which more relates to concentration of virus in a particular volume. Hunt down Korean CDC or somebody like John Campbell who has dissected the result tests, both of them know what they're talking about.

LL - out of 10,000 people who had previously tested positive just under 300 then showed positive on retest but when they looked at these 300 carefully what they were finding was dead virus being expelled with cells from the lungs and can do so for up to 3 months. Unfortunately antigen test only spots virus not whether its live or dead however they did some additional testing to confirm this.

LL - think additional information released yesterday by the Korean CDC based on 10,000 positives tests confirms no reinfection or reactivation of the virus & antibodies present. Good news

Inan - why post this stuff?
Are you for real?
Well because BS put a clear concise post up expressing a view as to why Government at this moment in time is directing disproportionate funds to Oxford.
I understood it, it appears nearly everybody else on this board understood it and it's context but for some reason you didn't and turned into yet another Ianaco drama.
Have I explained it simply enough for you or am I going to come back in from the fields in another hour or so and do it again?

Good Lord Inan, have you read your 10:45 post back to yourself.
Last time such a messiah complex was seen was circa 2000 years ago.
Is that a subtle enough hint to you as to your approach and way you come across.
BS's post didn't need pulled up ,rather you decided it needed pulled up whilst the huge majority of posters on here understood it entirely for what it was.

A little bit of good PR which may bring some people to this board ........... if they make it this far on today's posts well done. However expect like myself most would have got bored and switched off. All this because BS had the temerity to suggest why the Oxford vaccine may be getting the accelerated treatment. PS, BS that was a good post before it was hijacked and turned into he usual.

BM hope you're right but unfortunately to me now has the look and feel of a Lenigas investment but we now have MiniLornes rather than MiniGases instead and we all know how they've worked out for people. Wish it was just FCT that was the sore one, have you forgotten about our Bitcoin mining fiasco investment and one or two others.

Lots may have changed in the world I agree but not here I'm afraid - spend money (invest?), several years later write off investment, restructure investee companies & head off in new direction, rinse and repeat.
Like most here now I guess, bottom draw and any sort of spike and like FTW will be joining the stampede to the door, fortunately I don't need to wait for anything like 20p.
Traders PoS for now IMO

3 year chart suggests nothing happens quickly in business other than writing down the value of investments in this one. Beginning to confirm to the old adage of if it looks like a PoS, feels like a PoS, smells like a PoS then quite possibly it is a PoS despite best efforts of several on here to say otherwise.