Member Info for Moljen

Inn - you are a cad aren't you. You suggested people seek out my posts and I confirmed that was a good idea then people could see the whole context but here we go with your usual cut and paste.
Do you not realise just by doing that you are in effect saying, "hoy you lot of ignorant plebs I know you're incapable of anything beyond kindergarten thinking so actually I've changed my mind as you can't be trusted to go and check stuff yourself out so here are the bits I want you to read".
So on tag team, for my team I'd actually take anybody other than you because you quite simply IMO would not be capable of working in a team as you are blinkered on subjects you have knowledge about but more dangerously are incapable (as the dilution fiasco proved) of accepting that being blinkered on subjects you quite patently don't have knowledge upon isn't what anybody would want in a team.
You appear to have no comprehension of the time value of money nor risk, perhaps if referring people back to posts they should go back to when you and I had a ding dong about white crows which you claimed were none existent. Obviously I'm not going to post the links to white crow photos from that spat as I trust people enough to go and see for themselves if they re that arsed they don't need me to start behaving like a narcissistic control freak as IMO that sort of behaviour isn't going to do anything to sentiment.
So yes you have a nice holding here as do many others, again IMO they're a little bit more classy in not shouting about it. What do you want a pat on the back? Okay have a pat on the back and well done as it seems you need it to be said to make you feel good.
Personally, over the last few months with judicious timing and taking onboard other peoples opinions there have been some rather good opportunities in NYCT, AVCT and more recently SNG. The posters who directed me in the direction of these companies are the sort I'd have in my tag team. Mmmmm because you don't acknowledge risk you potentially missed out on these short term opportunities (SNG potentially an exception as if the plaster is sticky enough you don't need an amputation each and every time and at £21.98 that's an awful lot of plasters for relatively few bucks in pharma land).

Well it's nearly an answer I suppose - are you saying sentiment has no bearing on share price and a company's long term prospects or are you saying BB's don't influence sentiment in any way? Or are you saying both or something else entirely that I've misread.

Hi Inn - went back a few weeks and checked my own posts as you suggested.
Strongly recommend everybody else does so also - 21st May are the posts Inn is referring to where I cam across a video regarding T Cells and made a request for the more science based posters to view and provide an opinion.
So Inn, that is a great crime is it to come across something and ask for an opinion from more informed people and you want to make an issue of it well be my guest because I'll give it back to you all day long. Some may consider you're just huffed because I didn't include you in the list of possible posters, doesn't require a rocket scientist to know why .... the aggro simply isn't worth it as you quite patently have the highest horse the board has ever seen.
The question you were asked to respond to was your reasoning as to why a disruptive board with people who wish to try and belittle people, nit pick till the cows come home is good for sentiment. I didn't ask you to repeat the behaviour again (numerous time already today) I asked how is it good for sentiment. Any chance you could answer the question because at this moment in time you are like a politician and again IMO how much respect is there for them around the world and you ain't certainly no Jacinda who may be one of the few who do garner any respect unlike the clowns here and over the water.

Morning Bermuda, we must have been writing at the same time so just read your post and pleased you didn't mind my oar being stuck in.
I look forward to reading your Redmile notes later (on whichever board), I don't look forward to any incessant nit picking after if you get an apostrophe in the wrong place :-)
Inn - I may be a loud mouth opinionated geordie but I actually call out carp on both boards not because of any high horse but because I have great faith in this company and want as many people to know about it as possible. It would be nice if I could refer people to here or ADVFN for background research but tbh honest would you based on what goes on? And then if I cannot refer people to here then I cannot refer them anywhere because most people researching will start with a company, then published research papers, then they'll seek out places like this. Mmmm, it's a cycle which needs broken IMHO, when people find here or ADVFN I think it'd be better for sentiment if it was well mannered, well researched and not full of pointless nit picking which ludicrously more often than not is over the same thing said differently. Really, it is quite crazy because of the mindset some of you have got yourselves into. Again just IMHO that it's not a positive contributor to sentiment so quite welcome to receive a response but how about it being on that subject which for clarity is IMO a nit picking, insulting, argumentative board over what is actually nothing doesn't help sentiment. You seem to have a contrary view which is perfectly valid as different views are good but I really would like to hear your rationale as to why you think it helps sentiment as for the life of me I cannot think of one. Thank you.

Morning Inn, I passed an observation and made it quite clear that is all it was as to why something has happened previously and why this board sometimes descends into farce.
I think it's called irony when I wake up in the morning and guess what, one of you is here trying to turn something into what it isn't ..... and no doubt the board will descend into farce again.
It's nothing to do with defending anybody, just get sick and tired of seeing very well respected posters contributing to the board and then they have to come back and justify / clarify what didn't need justified / clarified because their first post was absolutely spot on.
Now please stop with this "oh he was just highlighting it may not be converted" aspect, it had already been highlighted by Bermuda in a very very balanced post.
This board already had one long period of not having this respected poster about for this and other reasons, I for one and no doubt many others are pleased they are back and would hope they stay.
This could be a phenomenal company and investment for all holding here, a lot of good news recently yet some of you on both boards seem to be more interested in continuing what has spoilt here and ADVFN for many a year.
If me observing a situation and commenting which IMO looks like a repeat of previous behaviour which led to posters not being here is being on a high horse so be it I'll take the view.
C7, I feel your frustration

GF123 - seen these posts about share totals and totally get where the occasional suggestion you are Inn also comes from. Bermudas initial post was concise, clear and factually correct with the if/when comment and thus included the outcome you suggested. However because it wasn't in a format you agreed with or you were too quick to type a response to recognise this the no you're wrong I'm right responses started even though you were saying the same thing. Sounds like remarkably somebody else who does that at times . I'm not arsed whether you are the same or not as makes no odds to my investment decisions but I do struggle to understand people who argue on such a basis especially when Bermuda made several very polite (unlike me) attempts to point this out to you

PMSL - well it'll perhaps answer one way or other as to what those trades were as 431M is over 3% so a TR1 should follow unless Regent are trying to get out of dodge and they are sells in which case we won't see aTR1 as forward selling will have them under 3%.

Mal, still deflecting because your BS about yesterday being the day we’d see the evidence the 72M and 71M were buys didn’t happen. Carry on there mate you may contribute something valuable about Prem but till then I guess just usual BS

Different day same old Mal BS because he can't discuss anything regarding Prem other than pontifications about how it's about to explode. So much so yesterday he told us we would see the evidence as to why he was correct and there was a buying frenzy going on.
Carry on Mal with the insults because even your BS isn't up to the mark so it's all you're left with

Mal you're arguing with the wrong person here mate, you need to go and have a word with The World Gold Council ......
The World Gold Council defines a high-quality underground mine as having a gold ore density between 8 and 10 g/t, while a low-quality underground mine has a gold ore density of 1 to 4 g/t.7 Feb 2020
Yep, ignorance can definitely be expensive but you already know that .... after all why else so bitter and twisted.
PMSL, back to training school for you.
AIM lesson 1: spot the idiots who ramp stocks when their knowledge is quite blatantly zero.
Silly boy, back to reception class for you Mal.
PS - where's today's evidence as to the sells not being sells

Evening Mal, consistent with the insults and also consistent with the BS to deflect your last bit of BS was BS. So we're all waiting because today you told us we'd see the 72 and 61M were buys and not sells.
Acker may well double his money on EPO (I'd hope or more iff I buy at the right time) and what is so wrong with that? To do so he will have to sell which would probably be a wise move if the EPO is granted and the ramp brigade get in full swing as 4g per ton on top of everything else says gold is just a red herring because there isn't actually a plan / capability to do anything else. You carry on holding at that stage, that's the beauty of choice, each to their own. I won't even bother commenting on ignorance is expensive as somebody who merely throws around insults probably doesn't have the class to understand the comment

Wolf, a million and one variables in building a mine let alone comparing apples and oranges however bearing in mind our achievements to date in monetising estimate 1.06% content (1 kilo per ton give or take) do you really think there is any credibility in us chasing something where a world class mine is 4g per ton? Cora is good example of the time & more importantly the cost $ of getting gold to DFS. A quick look at Cora's Balance Sheet for to date expenditure and their recent fundraise to pay for DFS. Cora is a pretty good one so also worth looking at if not done so before and you want a goldie explorer to producer in next 3 years. Now think Prem, mmmm would just be another red herring to me. In my mind always was and always will be Zulu as the project to focus on. Over the last few years we've p****** more up the wall than it would have cost to reach DFS on the 3.5Km. We know it's part of the great big vein so a pretty good chance you could extrapolate from our 3.5km if it had been DFS'd . We're not even at minimum jorc compliant stage on the 3.5km, how much to even get it (if) we get the enlarged EPO area? If / when it arrives more potential but bigger cash cost to deliver potential and a major into Zim at present to assist, dubious. Maybe Acker will give you different take but that's my view

Unfortunately it was a sell as was the one the day before for 72M. Honestly the ramp big buys was done on the day and Mal tried to put up a similar view and told us yesterday we'd see he was right. No idea what we were supposedly going to see as he hasn't shown up to explain what we're meant to be looking at today to confirm.
All I see is two more end of day trades by the seller but the hush hush whisper campaign of it's just about to happen appears to have run out of steam so today's take was lower.
Guess it means normal downward trend will resume till the next time. Anybody keeping track of whether we're under a billion yet for them to offload?
Hope I'm wrong for the people who've provided the seller with £120K as feel lower prices will occur, next few days activity should tell one way or the other as if wisely spent or just another in a long list of similar episodes

A few days ago WTP provided a great link as follows and Bermuda and one or two others have highlighted we now have an updated website.
If you've not had opportunity to check both out, well worth 30 minutes of your time.
https://www.nottingham.ac.uk/impactcampaign/news-and-views/items/news/alt/2020/transforming-cancer-research-to-tackle-covid-19.aspx

Apparently not as yet another post on the subject.
Inn we've been diluted, I know it, C7 knows it in fact every flaming poster on the board knows it apart from you.
RR - perhaps you could unequivocally give your view in form of we've been diluted or not been diluted as I see you're now the blockage to Inn accepting we've been diluted.
My post was going to be to repost WTP's NU link yesterday but what's the point till this farce is resolved

Inn - just one other person, OTHER is the operative word

we've not been diluted, obviously

Anywhere on this planet who subscribes to Inn's view that we've been diluted.
He's been asked nicely to stop cluttering up the board on this topic, he's been provided with numerous references to what dilution and rights issues are, by recommendations people have told him we're bored stupid with his totally incorrect view on this subject.
So Please Please if there is one other person who remotely thinks we've not been diluted please say so otherwise Inn for once just accept you're wrong and stop filling the boards up with carp and let things like WTP link to NU from yesterday be the thing potential investors first see not you trying to squirm out of being wrong on this plain and simple.
Just one post Inn and if there isn't one please just swallow your bloody pride and even if you find that impossible to do just don't post on the subject again. We need sentiment now and you are not helping in any way shape or form at this current time because you said something incorrect and just won't accept it.

Ooh big deal slipped finger however using the supposed buy try:
61,000,000 * 0.078 = £475,000 odd
whereas 61,000,000 *£0.00078 = £47,580
I'll leave you to argue with a calculator that the share price is not £0.00078.
It's a long way from £0.0032 but you keep cheer leading and I'll keep buying and selling when the time is right and for me it's not now

Mal, I'm not sure Prem was ever 4p, whatever it's highest point which I think from memory was 3.6p it's now 0.0008.
Now what is the reason for that incredible drop? I know, it's all the SFA achieved points you claim you wish to discuss eerm until they are brought up that is.
You may wish to applaud a BoD who have achieved 3.6p to 0.008th of a penny I'm not too sure many others would fortunately for me I didn't and have profited very nicely and will hopefully do so again.