enegyface25 Jan 2011 11:06
Funny. Arrogance was a word I deliberately avoided using in my last post, as I was trying to explain the reasons for my misgivings about your sudden appearance and postings, rather than to offer assumptions about your character. And I haven't commented - and wouldn't dream of doing so - on your spelling, other than to repeat that it sets my alarm bells ringing when someone seems to imply a closer connection with a company or its directors than your ordinary PI, but makes a basic error with one of their names - it could be an honest typo, but it makes me wonder. Perhaps it will make things clearer if I explain that there was an incident on a board I watch a year or two ago, with a poster who suddenly appeared, started posting reams of info that had been cherry-picked for its positive slant (much of which was out of date and recycled) and kept a bunch of relative newbies enthralled for weeks with his tales of a significant holding, visits to head office and snippets of info from his email conversations with directors, and his confident projections for the future based on what he said he knew and saw. He was called out by some of the more experienced regulars, of course, (not me, incidentally - I was fortunate to be a watcher rather than an investor on that occasion, but I learned a lot). It got rather heated, but he persisted and created quite a buzz, perhaps enough to account for the increased volume and rising SP in the short term. When it all went pear-shaped, as it did, he vanished, but some had been daft enough to plunge a lot deeper than they should in the meantime. Yes, you can say it was their own fault, and of course it was. You DYOR, make your own decisions, take responsibility for them, and accept any consequences. But it left me with a kneejerk, perhaps unjustified, suspicion about that pattern of behaviour when I think I see it starting up somewhere. I sincerely hope you are a fellow investor, in for the long term and pretty confident about Avacta's future, because the more of us there are, the better for the company. And if you do visit York, get to see the business plan and hear directors' own analysis of the current position, and feel this gives you more ammunition for your own decisions, the very best of luck to you. I think my predictions about Avacta's future are worthless to anyone but me; others will have to gaze into their own crystal ball. But if I didn't think this was a sound investment and getting sounder, I wouldn't be here.