Heid you said you bought more today. I said nil below 19.93p, was I right? None of my business, but if you please, what did you pay?
Pboo, far as I can see you couldn't buy under 19.93p. I look as the graph, then the list of trades on here, and I conclude this morning was a failed tree shake. Had it fallen further, I (&Heid it seems) would have bought more. What next? Virgin time stretches out of sight. "Past performance is not a....", but the future might be just as crazy.
Pboo (&EaglePI other thread), of course if they had been real retiring buy-backs, the number of shares in issue would be the same regardless of sp fall. Still, always nicer to pay less.
Heid, hint what hides behind asterisks of your 0943 post?
Who knows, has been lower? Cash ready. (Of course when it was lower there was a lot less cash in bank.)
Such a fine distinction I wonder it's worth making. Say, when you have bought all the shares in a company, do you not own it then?
Bobss, I might never get mine. However it seems I shall prosper if I keep selling over 86c and keep buying below 56c. Hence sp destined to dwell between those figures; oh well heath and happiness better than cash.
Acker, I don't think you're being ironic. Bally, what was plan B?
Better than shipping in lng for same purpose imo. Wait & see.
Mrs W, I can't deny your prediction, while I doubt it. Not long since this fell below 11p. Que sera. I shan't repeat a Heid forecast, while higher still is possible. Take it easy.
Heid, the point is that while your SHARES in the company might be worth less on the market, your SHARE of the company is undiminished. End of the day, what it's about. People have sold out, lost big, from bashers &/or sp intended fall. Assuming folks have followed basic investment rules, HOLD.
JOkin, agreed the inconsistent sp movements point to deliberate manipulation. Your shorting comments noted but not proof. Imo, Cui Bono is The question. We might never discover exactly who did what and when, but the effects should provide an insight. Those induced to sell have been robbed, pure and simple.
Sure Tovoc, Wressle is very valuable to us, but everything has its price.
Johnnypc, the Spanish Inquisition?
I'll take that as a No, then. Note that the later 22.15p "sell" was also a buy.
Today have been buys, and that true sells have been negotiated only most of the day. Anyone have contrary evidence?
Many suspect manipulation here, but in this case, who benefits? No answer fits right imo.
Marcus & Gold_, I don't think ujo is special, but LonSouE have issued most or all r
RNSs this morning. ADMIN.
Borin, you use your experience and judgement, then you don't necessarily get it right. Time usually tells. No it's not just you.
The .435p price was what I could buy at at about 1627, if I remember right. Could sell only negotiated. To me this says it was a sell, or they would have readily taken mine. But then why would MMs sell more to me at same price? No, we need to wait and see.
#dross, not cross.
It appears a very lean posting day. No complaint for the absence of usual endless cross; but is it LonSouE failing to record? Since the childish symbols appeared within posts, there seem to be delays in posts' publication. Still, fair vfm, as it is free save advertisements.
I think we are 4% down, but above the 17m low of a couple of weeks ago. Life is full of surprises, aim, & ujo, more so.