Charles Jillings, CEO of Utilico, energized by strong economic momentum across Latin America. Watch the video here.
fleccy, perhaps you may need to do some reading into what a Blockchain is and what it does. Here is a handy url that contains some badic information that may assist you in better understanding "blockchain": https://www .investopedia. com/terms/b/blockchain.asp
It was a copy of one of RKBs tweets:
https://twitter.com/RKBeekeeper/status/1598591088712900610?t=PKP8sZqlJv_O93964Mi-uA&s=19
@Addisonshare, you can check here https://explorer.btc.com/btc/blocks
i usually check once a week by doing an export, opening in excell and filtering by Solo CK. But i would assume that QBT may well have set up their own pool now?
correct me if i am wrong but my understanding is....
google just reports the latest reported trade. So if this is late reported, google doesnt care!
The last trade shown on https://www.londonstockexchange.com/stock/QBT/quantum-blockchain-technologies-plc/trade-recap is for a trade at 15:52 but reported late. hence the price on google jumped to that price.
Maybe someone more experienced than me could confirm or correct me?
https://btc.com/stats/pool/Solo%20CK
5 this year have been through the Colo CK pool including the one from this morning.
https://solo.ckpool.org/
another solo miner success today:
Height Relayed By Time (UTC) Tx Count Reward (BTC) Size (KB) Fees (BTC) Average Tx Fees (BTC) Volume (BTC)
721575 Solo CK 2022-02-03 T01:17:06Z 826 6.27677489 560.42 0.02677489 0.00003242 1868.844983
https://btc.com/btc/block/721575
@Lokiloo , do you know that CARD hire Christmas temps to cover the busy Christmas period. and they do use staff to fill shelves during the day as well as out of hours, otherwise the selves would run out half way through.
My understanding is that the management above Store Managers is where the problem lies. Poor wages and very low hour contracts (not 0 hour!) is their problem, as they struggle to retain decent staff. My Hoping was that the new CEO would drive in some good changes, but these will not show overnight. The Refinance deal they arranged hasn't bothered me as i fully expect this to be paid off without a raise. If there is, i have funds available if needed.
I brought in when this was cheaper, mainly for the return of Dividends. I believe the price will get back to over £1 when this is announced.
Obviously all my opinion so make sure your DYOR
JS does not have a notifiable intrest of share to churn as per 6th May!
https://www.lse.co.uk/rns/CLP/notification-of-change-in-major-shareholding-dlj4yl861w4j431.html
Do you mean churn his 2p warrants?
He would need to give the QBT £2m for the privilege to get these, a welcome boost to the cash. If he does, it would be safe to say he wouldn't be selling these at a loss.
Be aware that the following 2 accounts are not FG. This has been confirmed by FG and the Leander PR team. They have confirmed that these are being investigated to see what exactly can be done. May be worth reporting these as impersonating someone else.
Twitter: https://twitter.com/FrancescoGard12?s=09
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/francesco-gardin-695a0b211
shareholder holding updated today:
https:// quantumblockchaintechnologies .co.uk/investor-relations/aim-rule-26
Major Shareholders
SHAREHOLDER ORDINARY SHARES %
HARGREAVES LANSDOWN (NOMINEES) LIMITED 22.67%
INTERACTIVE INVESTOR SERVICES NOMINEES LIMITED 13.44%
VIDACOS NOMINEES LIMITED 10.39%
EUFINGEST * 9.61%
HSDL NOMINEES LIMITED 8.14%
LYNCHWOOD NOMINEES LIMITED 6.02%
BARCLAYS DIRECT INVESTING NOMINEES LIMITED 5.98%
FRANCESCO GARDIN * 3.82%
LAWSHARE NOMINEES LIMITED 3.08%
PEGASUS PIROUETTE CAPITAL LONDON Ltd * 3.00%
*Disclosed as a beneficiary interest
Completely agree Fig and HighEnergy. Not acceptable at all from Barclays. Even X-O have sorted it out! Still using these until i get the rest of my investments into the ISA.
I did not have any stop losses set but i believe this was not just Barclays that would have had these cancelled due to the name change.
Even my
Its just a case of waiting Bluhope
Barclays response regarding this is:
I can confirm that we are currently reviewing the stock to see whether this can be added to our platform for purchases to be made. I'm not able to give a time-frame for a decision being made, however, it is being looked at as we speak.
When questioned that this stock was available for purchase before name change the following response was given:
Whilst I appreciate that it has been as a result of a name change it is a new listing that is being added to the platform thus it needs to be reviewed.
No worries for me as i currently do not have any additional funds to buy. But if needed, i can still sell (not that i plan to!)