RE: Good deal for the lenders14 Feb 2019 11:57
So there are 3 maybe 4 plans all of which have their flaws:
Plan A,
The Interserve plan, dilute existing shareholders
to pay down a huge amount of debt, handover to the lenders in order to continue trading.
Pros. Solves the debt problem. Keeps IRV solvent.
Cons. Might not get through
Plan B,
The Interserve back up plan, push through some sort of deal through anyway.
Pros. We dont know know because it could just be a bluff.
Cons. Could just be a bluff.
Plan C
The Coltrane/Farringdon Plan, sack the board then see what happens.
Pros. Some satisfaction that Board members are removed (maybe with a golden goodbye)
Cons. Doesn't solve the debt problem. Irv could end up trading insolvent. Lenders may decide not to continue lending if they don't get their way.
Plan D
The PI shareholder plan, go ahead with D4E but on a 50/50 basis.
Pros. Gets some of the debt down. Doesn't damage PI shareholders as badly.
Cons. Lenders may not support a deal to continue lending to a company with junk credit status and the deal falls through.
Whatever happens, looks like mid march before anyone makes there next move? With the debt increasing by a rate of £12.5m per month (at least between November and February), the total debt may be somewhere around £767.5m. The debt may build up at such a rate and start running away to the point where nobody on any side can get a deal through.