Member Info for Mattyboy-

I think he meant the FT Bruce.

The NCA is investigating ONE of Boo's SUPPLIERS....NOT Boo and it is not just Boo that will attend a parliamentary commission but a range of industry leaders. US court case is horse s***.

From the FT article.....
'Analysts are nonplussed by the noise. Peel Hunt dismissed the developments as “nothing new to see here”. Number crunchers at Mirabaud — the team that infamously set a price target of zero on Wirecard — said “this is one dip that we think is an opportunity”. It is a song sung in unison, it seems, with 15 out of 21 analysts still positive on the stock.'

Sorry Bruce,was talking BWNG.Got side tracked.

P/E is 6.

I also hold BWNG, turnaround going on there...next week will be interesting.Did 9% yesterday so hotting up nicely.
92% sales are now digital. Debt misunderstood.

27. I am satisfied that Boohoo did not deliberately allow poor conditions and low pay to exist
within its supply chain, nor did it intentionally profit from them. I do not accept that
Boohoo’s business model is founded on exploiting workers in Leicester.
28. There is clear evidence that many of the processes which Boohoo has now put in place
had been planned a year ago and are not simply a reaction to the negative publicity in July
2020. Their culpability lies not in doing nothing but that they did too little too late.
29. That being said I am confident that the adaptations which Boohoo should make involve a
relatively easily achieved realignment of its priorities and governance systems and that the
Board should not feel discouraged. It has already made a significant start on putting things
right.
30. I am encouraged by the evidence I have seen that Boohoo’s recently-appointed Head of
Compliance has made contact with some of the statutory authorities with a view to,
amongst other things, establishing a single point of contact for reporting allegations made
by whistle-blowers or revealed by their own audit and inspection checks.
[C] To consider the boohoo Group’s compliance with the relevant law
31. There is no evidence that Boohoo has committed any criminal offences.

Boo moving forward.

.....here come the 1 post boiler room boys....always nice to see.

Holdings RNS 6th July Merian

One reduced I believe Bruce.

And why wouldn't the Instis be behind us? We have pledged to clean up our supply chain issues(which we had begun anyway....see QC report) and we are one almighty money making machine.

"Jupiter, which owns just under 10 per cent of Boohoo, rejected the call for new leadership, however. Ms Pease said she was reassured by recent measures, which include a promise to publish a list of suppliers and add two new board members to oversee sustainability work and Boohoo’s “change agenda”.

“[Jupiter] pushed them very hard to go down this particular route and in credit to the company, they haven’t pushed back,” said one person with knowledge of the two parties’ conversations."

So you’re here to tell us all that there are other shares out there....thanks for that.
And thanks for the NCYT tip, I’m sure none of us are invested there or even have heard of it.

27. I am satisfied that Boohoo did not deliberately allow poor conditions and low pay to exist within its supply chain, nor did it intentionally profit from them. I do not accept that Boohoo’s business model is founded on exploiting workers in Leicester.
28. There is clear evidence that many of the processes which Boohoo has now put in place had been planned a year ago and are not simply a reaction to the negative publicity in July 2020. Their culpability lies not in doing nothing but that they did too little too late.
29. That being said I am confident that the adaptations which Boohoo should make involve a relatively easily achieved realignment of its priorities and governance systems and that the Board should not feel discouraged. It has already made a significant start on putting things right.

All about US growth now. Last RNS it was 82%.When is next TU?

'gave myself a 2 day break'.....LOL....you sure about that? Rather too quick to state the fact methinks.

....you are all responding to Windrum (who I have filtered) which is just what he wants you to do.

Sussed him long ago.A dangerous paid deramper here to seed doubt and fear.

Also very clearly a raging narcissist with his reams of self-indulgent recapitulation.

You're not an OV by any chance Chris?

Sorry....wasn't it Boohoo asking Priti for a licensing scheme?

I filtered this poster.
Clearly a deramper...albeit quite subtle.
Every post is littered with doubt and innuendo.
Here to spread fear.

Boohoo have committed to change following independent review.

We are seeing the start of that change.

As a result of the changes our corporate governance will be all the stronger.

What they need to do is not respond to the short-driven media campaign.That would be a mistake.
What they need to do is carrying on selling increasingly large amounts of clothes and making shed loads of cash, which is what they excel at.
They have already responded to supply chain issues and change is underway.
Shorters all out here to scare you into selling.