Member Info for Markshares

Beware the buying and selling bots, has just switched back to the sell side

As far as I'm aware "rumours" can not be done for insider trading, and proving the source would be impossible either way.

To be honest I think the recent moves may have been down to spreadbits with companies like IG who specifically take positions against their clients. The rise today would be those same clients closing or being closed out, thus IG doing the same. Why that whole practice is allowed is beyond me - it is market manipulation and if the client does the same, they get done for it.

I read an RNS recently specifically exempting from takeover rules but I can't even remember what company it was. Nice question on woodford, leas but I'm guessing his holding won't drop below 29 so no need to RNS either way (can't be bothered to check the maths right now but will tomorrow on my pc)

FRR looking to relist is pretty massive news isn't it? That's awful of IG to try and take 20k more from you, and presumably looking to do it quickly before any relisting can happen

Looks like he's created another new account then

Now that's a very good point, will be very interested to see.

Come on guys this is basic stuff

They haven't sold any, that's the point. Just proportionally hold a lower percentage because there were more shares in issue on the 28th

The RNS to show invesco reducing is because of the staff options. I expect similar ones to follow, so nothing to see here.

That is huge, and above the offer price, so it does look like a buy.

I'm a believer in EQT, they have all the signs of a full turnaround-story, all it needs it patience to hold and I think AIM in general lacks that massively. The only thing that needs to be considered if projects in the pipeline being converted to contracts. Everything else about institutions loading up and stabs in the dark at where the SP price will move next add absolutely nothing of value here and I think in the long run its harmful as it gets investors hopes up for a quick return and they sell up when it doesn't materialise. Make your decisions on RNS and wider market information and not of the resident idiots here, from both sides of the coin.

Kingshott, I was actually alarmed at the published buys to sells today (approx 25 Vs 8million) so I went through all 210 trades individually using a good eye rather than just using the default bid and ask price.

I also did numerous dummy buys and sells throughout the day to see what tricks they MMs were up to - and there were MANY. I have not seen the bid and ask so badly reflect the trade prices on EQT since I climbed onboard.

My figure came out at about 19m buys Vs 14.5m sells, but that too could be wildly off when you factor in the market maker tricks.

Baxter, your "attack" is about as worthwhile as the AIM guys ramps, just constant nonsense posts.

Looking at your history its amazing how little content any of your posts have, even on shares you hold. I see such timeless insightful gems as "Getting ready for the move North", "Fireworks Monday!" and "Should move now" in your most recent page alone. Boy, you are a real asset to every board you grace.

fairview, I said at least three times on here that a new nomad would have no affect on the share price, I think someone even called me a moron for suggesting such a thing.

I am a holder but a realist and I think it's unhealthy when peoples expectations go too far and its good to keep them in check. This is the main reason I hate the guy who posts as AIM as well.

Wow that's a lot of RNSs

Roobler, this might be market lesson 101, but institutions are known generally for being long term holders, they buy to invest rather than flip it in a short time for quick profit. Whilst I am sure they would like to do the latter, there just isn't enough liquidity in AIM at any given time for them to be able to buy or sell as much as they would like, so they are either in from early on or take a while to build a position.

The share price is dictated by current trades rather than ownership. If institutions are generally HOLDERS rather than buyers or sellers than their positions do not affect share price in short or medium term as they are not trading them.

All this means that retail investors not only 'move the needle' sometimes, but in fact are behind the majority of needle moves (on AIM this is, not the main market).

Market makers make their money on trades, so if no trades are coming in, they will begin to drop the price, fishing for some action. You can occasionally see unfasionable shares lose huge percentages on the back of miniscule volumes so don't assume you need big trades to 'make things happen'.

Obviously when institutional investors DO decent to sell or buy, they move that needle a lot more than retail ever could, its just that those instances are a lot rarer.

So what's left for the derampers now? I guess only comments relating to not knowing what the margin is on the £10m contract and that's it. I maintain it is a good thing that they don't share this information as it would impact on other contract negotiations which are going on at the moment.

I don't own, never have, but this is unheard of! Someone better informed explain what is going on? Is Tinkler buying everything? Are IIs confident of a legal battle win?

So EQT have increased and consolidated the loan AND got a 33% redecution in interest rate! They really have turned around since Ian Price came on board, I'm very impressed.

Day by Day the derampers lose another excuse to hold on to; all they are left with now is mentions of NOMAD which we all know has always been a formality. Do you think the loan would increase if they believed there was a chance EQT would be suspended?