Member Info for Mark44085

Yep

Love all your titles.

Split... Especially so. Great movie mate

Johnht

Come on mate, take time out....give us your favourite movies

Promise, no come back with sarcastic comments from me. Just want a break from all this banter

@Saihaj

You are a man with my heart. Gangsters all the way.....

I love Joe Pesci (and he features in a lot of your films above). He is a really scary little guy

@Johnht

Now, I know that your are ignoring my post. Please take the time out and list your favourite films. I promise not to discuss it with regards to CINE. Just give me your best films.

Not seen American history X. I know that it stars Edward Norton. And the funny thing is Chrishar that I am typing this as I watch Red Dragon with Ed Norton and the brilliant Anthony Hopkins

The other movies...... Brilliant.. especially In Bruges....... It got low attention in my mind

Hi Chaps and Chapettes

Can I wade in with a question that has nothing to do with CINE but might be a light question for all on the battle lines ( both for and against CINE)

Its the weekend and lets have a little break from the battles.

What are your favourite movies ? Mine are.....

The Day Of The Jackal
Leon
Godfather
Saw (the first one only)
Back to the Future (first film)
Shawshank Redemption
Jaws
The Sting
Pulp Fiction
Escape room
Alan Partridge : Alpha Papa
No Time to Die.....yeah...yeah....I´m fibbing.... I have not seen this one

@Saihaj

Bless you mate. You are battling alone on these boards. It reminds of John Snow in Game of Thrones falling from his horse and grabbing his sword as the multitude of horses and men rode towards him.

I won´t weigh in as its the weekend. I would recommend my friend that you do the same. We are in for the long term and maybe the stock will go low next week but 2021 will be a good year for CINE.

The weekend is a rubbish time to post anyway, so leave it to the de-rampers.

I have to admit johnht that Investroid is one of the better paid de-rampers. He has put more thought into the "story" of why he is on here rather than shamus just say "35p will be next".

He´s very good and a credit to the team

No you didnt

@Investroid

You must be quite tired at the end of the day will all this negativity and fighting battles that you will not win? Don´t get me wrong, I won´t win either as you can never win against a de-ramper and you guys can never win against an investor

But to battle day after day with such negativity must drain you. Also, if you are not paid (which I don´t believe) but ok, ok to give you your due, if you are not paid, then you are truly nuts.

@investroid

Ha, ha !! That covers absolutely NOTHING ! Just dissect your post yourself. Its all assumptions, predictions and what ifs and just your opinion. No facts. Assumptions like........


"likely to need raise further cash" - Assumption
"failure on debt covenants likely" - Assumption
"Tenet,no guarantees" - Assumption
"Tenet , not bringing in numbers" - Assumption as the figures are not out yet for CINE
"Cinemas running on loss" - Assumption as figures not out yet for CINE
"no Blockbusters" - thats just a lie

You know..........cannot be bothered to go on. Assumptions and putting a negative slant.

Your final line makes me laugh the most "I think that covers it"

NOT !!!

You really are not good at this are you investroid. You will get a pay cut if you are not careful

Another belter from Shamus

@investroid

Anyway, you must have done more than your quota for today,´s posts, you can have tomorrow off.

But then, there is overtime isn´t there?

@investroid

You should re-read your posts then. You will get a blast

Yes, I am sir. I saw an advert on a freelance site advertising for bloggers for a "well know share chat site". They were offering an hourly wage for a certain number of posts an hour. Now in the interest of transparency they did not say that it was LSE and when I asked for details they would only give full details when they received my contact details, which I never gave.

So, my guess is that it WAS for LSE and it was for de-rampers, but that is only conjecture.

Its the ONLY reason why you would post on this board when you have absolutely no belief in this share. It certainly isn´t to warn investors that they are making a mistake because you get angry and sarcastic at everyone that attacks you. I would think if you were that negative then you would not post and take comfort that we will all lose all our savings.

@investroid

that´s because you have only been recruited recently.

@investroid

What a load of white noise and what a load of rubbish. You are more articulate that your cronies I will give you that.

But it comes down to the fact that you are on this board to bash the share and you have no interest in CINE. But keep posting and true investors will keep replying to you..

Nature of the beast !

@crumpets. I would have said twats but I think you are nicer than me.

Its a lie Prayfor. He has invested in CINE before and then comes on to bash the stock and battle with the investors.

Nope, he obviously has an ulterior motive like all the other de-rampers and its so obvious that he does and everyone can see that.

Yes, very sincere Investroid. You have obviously spent time coming up with that.

Its not true though is it Investroid. If you had truly invested in CINE in the past then you certainly would have a balanced view as you had believed in CINE when you invested. As you constantly bash CINE and are obviously angry when people call you up on this then the reason that you have given is not true.

I have invested in other shares and lost faith in them, but keep an eye on them. No true investor would then go on that board totally bashing the stock and then arguing with the investors, getting angry with them because they want to call out the de-rampers.

Its a good story that you give, but its a lie

Oh and, I´m not going anywhere either.