RE: sp12 Jul 2022 19:55
@Harka.
It isn't just about irrational short term price movements. Those happen all the time. When they happen so soon after a significant dilution at a heavily discounted share price, they suggest a connection. In spite of your take on it, perhaps their message isn't getting through? I personally feel that communications are inadequate (frequency) and sometimes contradictory (content/strategy).
I don't think.you can blame shareholders for assuming that the discounted placement price was to be mitigated by a rapid/immediate acquisition, as is often the case in such circumstances. We have not seen an immediate acquisition so doubts are raised as to the identification of acquisition targets and timing of the placement. Such doubts are compounded when a subsequent RNS muddies the water by introducing the prospect of 'mergers' a message taken a step further in a note from the lead underwriters of the placement that emphasises the prospect of a takeover of SOUC. The same note discusses the use of all of the placement proceeds in Q4/22 to support an increase in drill rate from 15 to 21 wells per year as a catalyst.
Perhaps the share price is dropping to reflect the doubts over timing, implementation and prioritisation of corporate objectives? For example, I have significant doubts that I would see the value of my investment restored to post-placement levels by a takeover of SOUC.
I'm happy for you if you think the road ahead is crystal clear but it seems that many PI's have less conviction and are understandably upset to watch the value of their investment diminish on a daily basis whilst the board sit back and watch. In my opinion there is a pressing need for them to restore confidence and slow or stop the drop in SP.