Member Info for Malachi

Doc
Thank you.
Moab

Ade
Inconprehensible post, why bother?

Loads
Thanks for this cheery clip. For the moment I am going to stick wih the global warming story, which should last long enough to see me off!
Moab

The ovarian study results are much later than expected. Worrying.

Bojo.
Parsortix does not collect circulating dna fragments it does not need to. Why collect fragments when you can get the whole molecule which is infinitely more informative?

A quick look confirms that the article does refer to circulating dna fragents, and not to CTCs

The delay to FDA approval (should we get it) is difficult to justify on the basis of additional work related to covid; 2020 OK, and 2021 perhaps. But Q2022?. Origially i think we had a revised date of Oct 2021, then end 2021, and here we are in Q2 2022. More lives being shortened by inappropriate treatment for ca breast witout any explanation as to the delay.
A conspiricist might suggest that approval woùld already have been given to a US outfit.

AE
Do not get too excited about the use of the term combustion chamber. You are quotking Tim Yeo, ex chairman whose grasp of the facts here was limited. He is, happily for PHE, no longer anything to do with the outfit.

But sadly not Humberside.

Many thanks for this succinct summary. A number on this board have thought of Parsortix as a cancer screening tool; would you care to comment?

Is AFC still involved with DeNora - and does DeNora fabricate membranes?

I share the cynical view about the power of US lobbyists. If i was running an outfit that examined fragments of circulating DNA, I would have my lobbyists doing everything possible to delay / prevent Parsortix from getting approval, as approval is certainly going to damage the opposition big time ( I have forgotten the name of the outfit mentioned above ? Illumina / Grail)

ML does not come over very well at interview, self effacing, and perhaps shy. But the products are there: historical problem is lack of sales. This needs to be turned around. Perhaps someone more dynamic at the helm?

Brazos
This is a very thoughtful, and calms me down somewhat!. Thanks.
Malachi

Glass half full, or perhaps slightly more than. Agree that MOU's are often meaningless.

Brazos et al
I feel very anxious about this. Drayson could hoover up as many of the shares at this depressed price as he likes. It then lowers his overall cost, assuming that he paid £1.75 as part of the original IPO. I think it is time to cut losses, but I would be interestied to hear other views.

Cheddar
The problem of keeping hydrogen under pressure and at very low temperatures remain. All this has to be acheived at a 'carbon cost', and i wonder how much of this cost is included in the calculations. It is all very well saying that there will be no carbon emissions, but that is not the whole story!

TopTrader
You thought I was being a tad cynical on Nov 11th when i suggested that any T/O or buyout would have Drayson's interests in prime position. In the light of today's reports, I have no reason to change my mind.
Malachi

"Waking others up is my mission & one that we have been extremely successful in doing."

Swazer. Your modesty continues to impress. However, some of us have read your wild and inaccurate PHE predictions with amusement, but would prefer you not to subject EQT to the same rubbish. Please take the hint.

Swazer
What a touching story of heartbreak. I am sure you have the deepest sympathy of so many menbers of the board.