Just for you ATM. The BoD are not obliged to disclose previous offers, unfortunately. I said a long time ago I would question their decision to reject a reasonable offer in the weeks before the war started and the tensions in the air at that time. That is not incompetence or dishonesty, by the way. However, our interests and their interests are still totally aligned. Earning big salaries has never been their aim over the last 25 years. That is very very clear. If they are earning and receiving salaries now, it is a sure and certain sign that the company is not now or likely to become insolvent before the big prize lands. Those unfortunates with more in this than was wise (for them)would snatch at 40P but CS won’t. Otherwise it would have been sold long ago, war or no war.
When you have flu relapses are likely if OCD forces a return to work too soon. The breath of fresh air was very brief this morning. Give yourself a couple of days to recover properly for the benefit of one and all.
The quality of being talkative, wordy, or glib: Look at the very volubility of his/her sentences—everything and the kitchen sink pushed together in breathless rushes of prose.
Time to draw breath indeed and leave the kitchen sink out of it. It can’t sink any lower than this.
RE: Disputed invoices is not the same as can’t pay them.5 Nov 2023 22:21
See RNS about table and bidders - topic definitively concluded, you are a malicious time-waster. I was going to add cretin but you are probably a bit higher grade than that.Always like to do people justice with totally fair and honest assessments. Discussion concluded.
RE: Disputed invoices is not the same as can’t pay them.5 Nov 2023 21:58
If it was going to be sold to anyone else, because money was needed, it would have already been sold. Simpler and much cheaper to have it included in overall sale price(s). Are you really and truly so dull? Topic concluded.
My God! R L Stevenson would have regarded this as a Godsend for a second masterpiece.
You still have 500000 shares? Get help quick before you make further insane disposals. The sale is coming soon. Don’t miss out. Then you can write your own dissertation in a calm sane state of mind, having avoided complete meltdown and financial disaster.
If it could be proved to me that that person still has 1m EUA shares and is praying inwardly for a good sale while incessantly and mercilessly bashing the share on this forum the men in white coats are urgently needed. Yet it could be true in that she cannot seriously expect intelligent people to believe her guff. These disturbing mental kinks need to be ironed out if she is ever to return to a normal life. Interesting case for the budding psychoanalyst who might base a case study on this individual and earn an Msc. at one of our leading universities.
RE: Disputed invoices is not the same as can’t pay them.5 Nov 2023 16:22
Your evidence that there is no table and no bidders round it for assets including concentrate?
Would it make sense to sell the concentrate to anyone else if they do not need money before the sale? Run away and hide until tomorrow at the very earliest out of respect for those in turmoil and anguish at having lost money because of scaremongering. Have you no fellow feelings at all for Toffers and others?
Incitation to suicide, just like constructive dismissal, is not acceptable, even in jest. I cannot recommend that post when someone clearly needs comfort and help. I mean, selling a million shares at a huge loss is almost enough to push any one over the edge, even those of us blessed with resilience and a robust mental constitution. All please take a step back and desist.
This board should suspend itself until tomorrow as a mark of respect. A number of people appear to have lost money here when they should have held on even with a high(ish) average.
RE: Disputed invoices is not the same as can’t pay them.5 Nov 2023 14:05
Mac and I agree, I’m sure, that Spike’s views on imaginary bidders and tables
casts great doubt on the truthfulness of C. Schaffilitzky. I like the latter’s quiet confidence and patronising comment on an amicable settlement. Those lawyers may have misjudged him badly and may soon regret it. It is even conceivable that they thought they had the upper hand and steely-minded CS allowed them to continue in that mistaken belief - until now. We will wait and see. Meanwhile the availability of $1m dollars is a fact and is not in dispute, unlike tables and bidders apparently. Mind you, both appear in RNSs.
RE: Disputed invoices is not the same as can’t pay them.5 Nov 2023 12:36
Go back to Mac’s last post. $1m dollar loan available at preferential rates no doubt. The BoD thought of everything
except the war. Mac quotes and remembers facts again and again that others do not want to quote or remember again and again. Mac repeats apparently forgotten RNSs. Simple fact. His opinions may be wrong on this or that but RNS facts are there for all who want to see them. Please look up relevant RNS and verify. Negheads won’t of course.
RE: Disputed invoices is not the same as can’t pay them.5 Nov 2023 12:03
With you all the way on that, Icecool. They are selling the concentrate to one of the bidders at the table. This is a sign a deal is not far Personally. I am feeling coolasacucumber. Now there’s a thought for a moniker for a newcomer who wants to join the faithful!! That person should relieve him/herself by lifting the phone and making that appointment and laying down the burden . Blissful relief all round
Congratulations to Captain Schaffilitzky. He preserved perfect composure all day yesterday in the face of provocations and slipped in an amicable sounding RNS to taunt the negheads after hours. It takes more than a malicious hand grenade lobbed on deck to deflect the good ship Eurasia off course.
Quite so, Jarv. That hysterical person cannot control him/herself. Lawyers and solicitors as I know very well from experience try it on all the time. One solicitor pursued me for three years for £750 with the direst of threats. I owed him no money and he knew it. After three years he just went silent. That kind of behaviour in the legal profession is very common. Pay up EUA or we’ll ruin your share price!