RE: Catching up10 Nov 2021 08:37
Thanks for your feedback. There's something just not adding up in all of this to me. Maybe I'm searching for something that isn't there. I totally agree it's absolutely abhorrent that they should do this fundraise when Toral didn't need it and to pursue "other projects". Someone even hit on the fact that maybe Toral could be imminently sold or JV and LR is trying to hold onto his job. In the 3 years or so I've been doing this, any stock in any sector rallies like mad if there's a slightest hint of a buyer/JV. This has done nothing. Zilch. Zero. I have never ever seen that before. This is why I think I must be reading something wrong.
If there is an interest in Toral I can understand why LR can't say as much, but normal companies would issue an RNS to say they are about to enter a period of negotiations. In fact, thinking about it, if they are talking to someone about EUZ taking on another asset then they should also RNS that. To just say we're raising some cash to buy something else, is somewhat difficult to understand (I'm trying to be kind and not use strong words). Clearly, some of you here have done your homework and there have been some exceptional posts. In fact, if the board of directors had acted as professionally as this chat board, we wouldn't have the issues that stand today. I do totally agree that LR, at best, has displayed a level of incompetence and failed, in parts, in his duty to shareholders. Is it just LR or are the rest of the board aligned? So, if LR is gone would he be replaced with someone better? I'm 100% in agreement though that we shouldn't just let them get away with this, and clearly direct emails don't appear to have any impact on them. If he was an employee in any other business he would be fired for misconduct.
I'm also in 100% agreement about Resolution 2 - unless they actually justify this.
One final thing I do want to say. Here we are of the belief that our votes wouldn't be enough to see the removal of LR, but hope to stop further dilution. Don't underestimate the combined power of us private investors. I've seen 2 examples (probably missed 20 more) where the pi's votes came as a total shock and resolutions were voted down. In one case the company was delisted and everyone lost everything. Look MTFB. Yep totally rubbish stock.
The chances are if we vote enough to stop further dilution, then we'll also be voting LR out.
I really appreciate the huge amount of effort some people have put into this, it's made it much easier reading for me than having to trawl through the legal documentation. I'm with you 100% on this and I share your frustrations.
It's still all rather strange behaviour from the BOD