RE: Scally20 Jan 2021 11:08
I'm afraid to say, it's hard to sugar coat it so awful is the word I would use. However that's exploration for you, sometimes you miss. I will post my thoughts later after dissecting the details but i'd just like to state that although they have missed so far, they have defined new targets and have 4 holes remaining in assay. So now it's a case of, how much do you believe in the exploration team to find the Cu-Au? That brings extra risk to the table. I see this as a bump in the road, i'll be looking for a top up if price continues lower as one set of bad results doesn't necessarily bring the whole company into disrepute