Arbitration31 Oct 2019 18:29
Assuming that my theory about the arbitration is right and the GG get the 5% RA when FRCC is liquidated, then ZM, SN and LB would have expected this to occur before the arbitration hearing in October. This hasn't happened and the timelines could have been calculated after FTI started the liquidation process of FRCC. Therefore, by dismissing Akin Gump in June (see extract from the court papers below) FRR could then request a six month extension to allow the process to unfold. As the extension is only to allow the liquidation of FRCC, (enabling the GG to get another 2.45% of the oil under the PSA and terminating the arbitration) and the case is now in the NY courts, it should be completed before the extension date. Assuming this series of events, then FRR would no longer require representation in the arbitration as the process is about to be resolved by the liquidation of FRCC. IMHO the court papers show a complex series of events to enable enough time for production revenue to meet FRR's obligations, remove SH/O and settle the arbitration. After reading those papers one would expect FRR to have had a crystal ball to be able predict the series of events, or in Tolkien language a Palantir. Doesn't BP have access to PALANTIR, who "amongst many, many other things, it seems they also help when" 'Prosecutors are building stronger cases against insider traders'(taken from Earsbern's post on the 28th October in the 9th post down of the link below). IMHO if Palantir has that sort of expertise, then creating this series of events wouldn't have been a problem.
67. First, the Liquidators were informed on July 9, 2019 by Akin Gump that it ceased acting
for FRGC in the Arbitration a month earlier on June 9, 2019.
https://www.lse.co.uk/chat/general/commodities-and-mining/frontera-archive-41C7D130-7E51-4344-82E7-83B697F53322.html?page=27