Member Info for Madpunter

The IPCC stated that the average temperature of the planet was 15° C back in the late 70's to early 80's and the temperature would increase by at least half a degree by the year 2000. This was based upon over 50 computer models, all with different figures, but all agreed on the same average and increase. They were all wrong as the temperature DROPPED to 14.62°C in the year 2000. As this didn't agree with what the IPCC wanted they spent the next 8 years manipulating the figures to show that the average was actually 14°C and not 15°C. One of the ways they did this is stopping the deduction of the Heat Island Effect, where it's warmer in city centre's than the surrounding countryside (buildings and people give out heat). Everyone I check on my car's temperature coming in from the countryside (avoiding roads that go up in altitude), the temperature averages 2.5°C warmer in the centre. However, as weather stations are generally in parks in city center's, they used to deduct 1.8°C from the figures. It appears that the margin for errors is far greater than the proposed increases in temperature and in fact we've had a decrease in temperature. This is backed up by the record sea ice in Antarctica, plus more acidic oceans killing coral reefs, and having to cull Polar Bears in the Arctic. The increased cold at the poles, which are desert regions pushes the jet stream towards the temperate zones, where more weather systems are encountered. This results in the jet stream having bigger peaks near highs and troughs near lows. Hence, the current heat waves in the Mediterranean and cooler weather in the UK. This also explains the 50 year lows in Winter in recent years where ice skating was possible on canals in Amsterdam and where record snow fell in the Sahara, Menorca, Japan, Texas, Arizona and the Eastern Seaboard of the USA.

Cymro1864 - Robin Dunnigan missed one word from that last sentence, 'yet'!

Jekyll - Take a look at the articles below. Does YA look like a company that sails close to the wind, or are the SEC just stupid?

https://yorkvilleadvisors.wordpress.com/

1 May 2018 — Yorkville Advisors, LLC is a privately owned and operated hedge fund ... of stock manipulators who like to “pump and dump” those shares.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/nathanvardi/2012/10/17/sec-charges-formerly-1-billion-yorkville-advisors-hedge-fund-with-fraud-and-bogus-valuations/

Judge axes key SEC claims that New Jersey hedge fund firm inflated assets

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-sec-yorkvilleadvisors-idUSKBN1H61KT

YA were taken to court for illegally selling shares in FRR, which they didn't own and quickly settled out of court in Frontera's favour. IMHO they've tried to use the courts to bring in the recievers, but now that has failed, will settle out of court to avoid the forward selling accusation surfacing again.

'Is all the recently cancelled Copper heading to China to refill empty bonded warehouses?

https://www.reuters.com/markets/commodities/global-exchange-copper-stocks-sink-15-year-lows-2023-06-27/#:~:text=LONDON%2C%20June%2027%20(Reuters),almost%

IMHO Putin and his puppets in the GG, the GD don't want a deal for Block 12 as it would compete with Russia's oil and gas exports. Therefore, October 2024 becomes significant as the elections are on the 26th October 2024. This will be the first time that the elections are fully proportional with a 5% threshold.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024_Georgian_parliamentary_election

https://politpro.eu/en/georgia

Monies might have come from SH/O as part of a deal to drop the cases. Otherwise SH might have had an appointment with Zib's Mr Big in the chokey. I don't think that a deal is possible ATM, due to the GD's alignment with Russia. Plus I don't think that MO would settle on the possibility of a deal. Lawyer's want to dot the 'i's' and cross the 't's' before agreeing terms IMHO.

Kelly Degnan - We see Georgia's European future under attack from an aggressive propaganda campaign designed to scare people

Kelly Degnan - We see Georgia's European future under attack from an aggressive propaganda campaign designed to scare people

We see that Georgia's European future is under attack from an aggressive propaganda campaign designed to scare people that Russia will retaliate if Georgia continues to move towards its European future, US Ambassador to Georgia Kelly Degnan said in a speech at a conference organized by the Rondel Foundation.

He called the restoration of direct flights by Russia and the cancellation of the visa regime for Georgian citizens a policy of appeasement and charm, saying that this is an attempt to distance Georgia from its Western partners.

"Faced with the oppression that comes with a close alliance with Putin, it seems unequivocally that integration with the West is the best choice for Georgia to protect its independence, the freedom that Georgians have made great efforts to restore over the last 30 years, after the end of Soviet oppression. This is the only choice to protect the rich cultural heritage of Georgia, the only choice to ensure peace, stability and prosperity. Polls have shown that 85% of the Georgian population supports Georgia's membership in the European Union, and approximately 75% support Georgia's membership in NATO. But we see that Georgia's European future is under attack from an aggressive propaganda campaign designed to scare people, that Russia will retaliate if Georgia continues to move towards its European future. "Probably, in exchange for the policy of appeasement, we see the restoration of direct flights and the lifting of the visa regime, we see a kind of "charm policy" on the part of the Kremlin to start normalizing relations with Georgia and try to distance Georgia from its Western partners," said Kelly Degnan.

Jan Boni - Actually, it is Russia that opened a second front in Georgia with the help of the Georgian government and its patron oligarch.

I was really shocked by some of the things that Prime Minister Gharibashvili and others said, accusing Ukraine and the West of wanting to open a second front in Georgia. Actually, it is Russia that has opened a second front in Georgia with the help of the Georgian government and its patron oligarch, Ian Bone, director of foreign policy of the European Reforms Center of the United Kingdom, said at the conference organized by the Rondel Foundation.

"The problem I see in Georgia is that people in Georgia know that we care, but the government is doing everything to turn the country in the opposite direction. I was really shocked by some of the things that Prime Minister Gharibashvili and others said, accusing Ukraine and the West of wanting to open a second front in Georgia. Actually, it is Russia that opened the second front in Georgia with the help of the Georgian government and its patron oligarch. This is the second front in which Russia is fighting with hybrid means. It is a mixture of disinformation aimed at creating fear of Western intentions and bribes such as the restoration of airline connections and offers of visa liberalization,” noted Ian Bohn.

According to him, Russia continues to occupy a fifth of the territory of Georgia and continues to expand these borders step by step through the process of "borderization".

Ian Bon believes that the West should increase the pressure on the Georgian authorities and emphasize that it supports those who share European values and actively opposes those who want to connect Georgia with Russia.

"I think the Western governments should put more pressure on the Georgian authorities and try to limit the bad actors in Georgia more strongly and declare: "We support those who share our values and work more actively to confront those who want to connect Georgia with the famous "Ruski Mir". ", - noted the foreign policy director of the Center for European Reforms.

Virtually nothing has been happening with SOLG for quite some time. Plus we know that Bob and his baseball bat is trying to sell SOLG. We also know that the Chinese have invested in SOLG recently and have completed a trade deal with the Ecuadorian Government. Furthermore, the Ecuadorian Government has leaked information suggesting the development of Cascabel. Therefore, it's a fair assumption that the Chinese, SOLG and Lasso could be thrashing out a deal. If a deal is close, then Lasso could take advantage of this by calling an early election. When campaigning Lasso could then highlight the thousands of jobs from exploration, construction and from monies spent by those workers. Lasso could also highlight the investment into the country, plus the environmental work, healthcare and education carried out by SOLG in the local community. Plans to continue this work by the Chinese could also be highlighted. After COVID-19 and the subsequent economic downturn, this could help Lasso gain another term, and the benefits over the next four years could even be a winner for the subsequent election.

Bl***y predictive text, it should be 'they're' and not there lol.

PS

It's the quickest way of getting on here for most companies. Three letters and a couple of clicks. Why type out links like www.lse.co.uk and then have to search for the company? It's the same with downloading and saving information. It's usually quicker to search in Google or another search engine than to try and find it on one's hard drive. Plus without loads of clutter on the computer, it works faster. The only items I have saved are family photos and I could delete them as there also saved elsewhere.

Coggy - If they can't get on here, hopefully they will Google FRR, Frr or Frontera Resources to see if there's any news. The first link then brings up this page, as it's the latest information posted on line about the company.

Perky1 - FRR or Frr is all that is required for the Google search.

Pbow posted about the trade deal being signed next Wednesday last Wednesday at 1604.

Looed - Without the Discovery, then the judge would be siding with Hope on what had been disclosed. That didn't rule out the Discovery could reverse that view.
If there is no smoking gun, then surely with what was inferred by the judge in the Cayman's, Hope would be more likely to win. This reason, plus the threat of a criminal case leads me to believe that a smoking gun is present and to why Discovery wasn't completed.
Pre-settlement, if the reason for bringing the case to California wasn't listed due to Hope's residency and business address, but for the potentiality of a criminal case, even after a CRS.
Apologies for the predictive text listing you as Looked. I'm using my phone ATM.

Sorry smoking.

Phil - If there's no obvious 'soking gun',then there's no reason not to file what has been found and complete Discovery. As for the court costs, initially they were paid from insurance and whether they reached a limit is unknown. We know that the money ran out for the FTI case, but without knowing the wording of the policy, there's no knowing if the limits applied to Director's individually or to the company taking out the policy.

Looked - The reason of Hope's residency was given to move the case from the Cayman's to California is correct,. However, if the real reason was due to the possibility of a criminal case, then by disclosing that reason, it takes away the threat of completing Discovery, which could be used as a negotiating tool

IMHO, this was the reason why the case moved to California.

EkXoc - Your forgetting that Discovery wasn't finished, which suggests that a 'smoking gun' was found, otherwise, there's no reason not to finish discovery. If CRS is achieved under the Californian jurisdiction, it doesn't negate a criminal case, if discovery unearths a criminal act or acts.