Member Info for Luckybob23

The warrants aren't shares until executed.

Joanne, two totally different things, not my fault someone hasn't grasped the topic of conversation

I think you're missing the point 2g2d.

We've just given 9billion to an unknown entity and are seeking to allow another 14 billion issued (if needed)

Those are not offered to us, the public. Therefore we could fall below the required 10% of shares in public hands. And delist.

Https://www.handbook.fca.org.uk/handbook/LR/6/14.html

I think this covers it mr green

This is one of those comments I always thought was a meaningless sound bite for people to parrot..

But I've just googled when is a start up nolonger a start up...

I'll be honest, didn't think it had much meaning.

But

. You are no longer a startup if you have achieved scale, albeit the arbitrary the definition of scale. Scale is typically measured in terms of revenue, number of employees and valuation, but can also include age i.e. categorizing companies that are more than 5 years old as no longer startups. In terms of revenue, number of employees and valuation, there is a set of metrics popularized by Techcrunch’s Alex Wilhelm called the 50-100-500 rule. This means that you can no longer be called a startup if you achieved or surpassed any of the following:

$50 million (around €41.9 million) revenue run rate (forward 12 months)

100 or more employees

Worth more than $500 million (around €419 million), on paper or otherwise

Makes you wonder what on earth Albert was on about.

Yup!

Edit, 6month from end of financial year and not more than 15 month apart.

Last years was announced on 31st may

Nothing on the website and no RNS ? It has to be announced and with ample time for us to prepare to attend or submit questions and it has to be within 6 month of accounts i think

SUPPLY@ME CAPITAL PLC

9,000,000,000

ORDINARY SHARES OF 0.002P EACH FULLY PAID

(BFMDJC6)(GB00BFMDJC60)

You missed a zero.

But yeah.. small change

Two £7k trades..

?

You are funny.

He's posted 18 posts in 30 days .

Go on, name all these detractors and put their post count up.

3 year ago there were between 4-8 people posting negative on here many times a day, some just flat out trolling...

Until we've some news to discuss or somebodysays something worth pulling up, this place is quiet

They'd lose 90% of their traffic.

These places are boiler rooms with sales men pushing both angles. Majority of profiles are fake and most don't have shares

It says in the RNS what the money is for.

When has a placing not been discounted? 5% seems a strange thing to complain about

And demo, you've been saying the same thing for 4 years.. and you still haven't learned to shut up and wait for it to happen.

So I don't think you've any right whatsoever to complain about other peoples voicing their concern

Plenty of time Joanne, but time is money, then 5 hours train each way, also expensive, so I'd have to stay overnight , more money.

Like I said. Best part of a grand wasted to listen to so done talk out their aŕse.. which I can do for free on here listening to you. Somebody who's not posted a single worthwhile opinion

Do you know what a front man is?

Like when someone's property or business is under somebody's name but they aren't the one making the decisions

I'm not even sure AZ is anything more than a puppet on a string as far as TAG goes

I do agree with the majority of that peak.

But to me the past is important.

Things like Nasdaq and share pledges are enough for me to say he's deliberately put out RNSs to enable other to offload.

Which was my reason for saying nieve investors. Because not for one moment do I think those RNSs were anything more than part if a cunning plan

Peak, most of us invested off the back of information given.

Some of that information includes

True sale being bullet proof

Storm harbour being close to completion

The pipeline which turned out to actually be just people who'd said they might be interested

The fact AZ insisted we had multiple funders, multiple times.. ect

I won't go on about the captive bank and 8bn funding because that was after I invested.

So it's really nothing to do with "getting rich overnight" and more to do with facts been misrepresented