Why so negative?30 Sep 2025 10:07
Very useful/transparent numbers; the only disappointment IMO is the low GM on LXs, but it'd already be rising due to econ of scale.
So, 26k reagent use from 3 CTMs gives 16kpa (min) per CTM; for H2 2025, we have 30 CTMs in total, thus 480k (min - and 1mln in 2026); add another 120k (min) from LXs etc, we have 600k in H2 (@70% GM) or, 420k Gross profit from Reagents (A).
We estimated for H2 about 20LXs sold pm, so min. 100 LXs - low ball estimate of 10k per LX gives 1mln for H2; assuming 25% GM, gives 250k GProfit (B);
Opex 110k pm (appx), which equals A + B above; therefore, the Co will B/E in H2 in a worst case scenario, with no further cash burn.
In a best scenario, whatever Gross Profit it makes from - not yet counted - C) SRB sales D) FX sales E) higher GMargin on LXs (target +50%) will equal Net Profit;
Cash of 585k plus 198k from Doha soon, means Cash will increase further if we have Gross profits from C and D above, minus more spending on the PD detector (to APTA etc) and the PFAS equipment development.
IMO, the results are positive, the Co has plenty of cash and is already at B/E (as a min.), despite the very low GM on LX (which is bound to go up), as production ramps up). DYOR, GLA!