Member Info for Lowrisktrader

However I am sticking. Agree with Mooro below. Looks like they have traction going forward with some good contracts building. I also like the fact that directors have put their holdings in SIPPS!

I can only presume they are trying to write a stonker!!

The articles are written by sheep who have gathered on a farm and not thought for themselves. Fortunately the government realises that the storm would be far bigger if the lights went out!! Incredible that not one journalist has thought to look at it differently.

Plutus has actually won 3 15 year contracts. Two of the spvs are "attune" and "balance". So as well as the Plutus energy win we have these two. Well done to the Plutus team. And thanks shog for winding me up !!

It really irritates me how these articles go on about how dirty diesel is. For f sake ! It is BACKUP power. The whole point is it can be switched on in minutes and turned off in the same. It is a very useful tool and is good value for money. They write these articles as if the plants were going to be on 24/7. Idiots. Fortunately the government realises this

Good news. I'm curious as to why only one was in the bidding process. I wonder whether there is one under a different name ? Plymouth doesn't seem to be there which is odd . Anyway it's a first step on the road to recognition. Reckon it represents about £400k of income for 15years just on that site.

I think there is some news out but im in a train in France and can't find it . Let's hope they have won at least one contract !!

Wrong year !

2 million seller at open. Who is it? Under the circumstances sp held quite well given that trade. Just hope whoever is selling is gone soon ! Really not helping .

Yes. I think if you look at the rules we will know within 8 days. Fingers crossed for two sites.

I did look at a few of the objections. I imagine they have gone now because the application has been withdrawn. Mainly local parents and a green pressure group . Totally misrepresented the plan making assumptions that power would be running 24/7 but obviously the weight of objections made ppg decided to avoid confrontation . Short term frustrating but probably good not to allow a head of of steam to build against the company .

shame about that but I reckon that they were probably wise not to fight it. There was a mass of local opposition by parents of an infant school. Badly advised as to ease of getting planning. It is a very industrial area but the nursery school is pretty close. I'm sure they have countless other applications in that we don't know about.

Think it could well have been a buy. Look at Thursday close price action . A buy of 2.9 million looks more likely . I actually bought at 1.05 as well which showed as a sell - 500000

Don't worry . Talking to yourself not the biggest crime on these boards . Hope you are right . We need to bounce off this level. Really don't want to drop below 1p

I'm pretty sure you are misinterpreting that copout. Paternoster very clearly stated their desire to hold the rest. What they have done makes absolute sense. They are now effectively running the rest of their Plutus shares at nil cost.nthey themselves are answerable to shareholders and haven't been doing well. They needed to show a profit. They could have gradually drip fed into the market but did it by offloading all in one go . This is a plus for Plutus. By all means keep your stop loss if you want but I am confident of the future.

There is some unbelievable crap being posted on advfn . Stand firm. These wobbles are nothing to do with sinister plots to take Plutus private . They are much more to do with nervousness over planning and dirty diesel perception . Both are overdone .

frustrating to see the sp slip and not entirely sure I want another 25 million shares floating around. However what paternoster have done is entirely logical and by no means undermines the business of Plutus. They still have a substantial holding. I reckon their mostpressing issue is making sure they get planning absolutely right. It is of paramount importance that they understand that the politics of all of this is very very important. They are being painted as polluters which they need to counter. I believe they are looking at other methods of powering the stand by plants. News on that would be very welcome

That's the plan!! Reckon the impetus was lost by that RNS a few weeks back and so fewer followers at the moment. I reckon it was an issue they knew they had to deal with and so got it out of the way. Clear water ahead I'm hoping and believing. I am fully expecting the 3 extra companies to be funded. We could also have some more planning news with any luck. Also very interested in the first tie up with reliance when that comes. Once we all fully understand how those projects are funded the share price will lift off.

There were quite a few rampers helping the last rise up to 2p. I personally think we will see 2p again but maybe not as soon as we hoped. More excitingly I think we could well be seeing 4p plus this time next year. The post AGM RNS was good to a certain extent although I was surprised at a couple of mistakes which should have been spotted by a proof reader. Strange because their major RNS announcements are usually thorough and well written. It strikes me that they were a bit rattled by the investor reaction to the resolution 6 RNS and have put out a slightly panicky AGM RNS which actually wasn't needed. What we need from Plutus is slow, steady, professional and consistent.....and no more surprises of the bad variety!!

Resolution 6 passed and a good explanatory rns. And don't forget the 140 mw stated is likely to be 200 mw by end of November. Great that they are still looking at 700mw. If they are anywhere near that this share price will be a distant memory .