Member Info for Louis10

It's becoming really tiring, Tony. Need to have a look into exactly who are you.

A financing is more or less certain, hopefully not at a lower level than the last placing.

Finding the 1 in 100 is what it's all about, but I think Jim's point is that profits for outside investors come more from trading than holding, due to the continuous dilutative financing necessary to progress projects.

Finished red.

First I3E forecast (going under 20p) was on here just the other week.

See that Miron is selling I3E. Do they not believe in the sustainability of the dividend?

Do they not believe the dividend is sustainable?

Hardly, Baxi. Along with a few others here who have drunk the Pantheon Kool-Aid, you appear to be totally deluded.

I'll stick around here and watch the inevitable descent to zero. Not short, just find watching you all (in particular the couple of company paid posters) quite amusing.

Red today.

Tony the troll yet once more. Did you read what Jim wrote? Here's the link again which was at the start of the thread -

https://oilman.substack.com/p/sunday-blog-29-january-2023

My post is based on your overreactions, guys.

Jim really gets to you guys. Not surprisingly perhaps when the share price is down by two thirds and none of the majors are interested in the acreage. You can see why people listen to him.

Actually Scot, if you read his piece he says several times that not all companies and directors are dishonest. The issue with PANR as I understand it is that quantities of oil in place etc. are not really relevant to actual commerciality and the lack of that is why large oil companies who know the North Slope inside out have no interest in PANR's land.

Apologies, Scot. It was Baxi who said he was blocked. But I don't think you can block on Substack, so that could be checked from the link -
https://oilman.substack.com/p/sunday-blog-29-january-2023

Hi again Baxi. As I said to Scot, I don't think Jim is questioning Schlumberger's data. He's saying that the company is misusing it to misrepresent the project as commercial.

Hi Scot. From what I see from his posts and blogs (I know you say you're blocked - abusive style maybe?) he's not questioning the professional's reports. His point is that the company is misrepresenting them to make people believe the project is commercial.

Scot126 says he's blocked too, but as you say it's an interesting and thought provoking piece, and I agree.

Hi Parker. There's no paywall, you just have to click continue reading.

https://oilman.substack.com/p/sunday-blog-29-january-2023

Interested to know your thoughts

But the placing isn't actually being done at 0.36p, is it?

Yes, but it's now 0.1825p. "Institution" selling it's 100 million free shares?

https://oilman.substack.com/p/sunday-blog-22-january-2023?sd=pf

Does anyone agree with this?