Member Info for Lottohopes

Filthy: So you become abusive when challenged. It’s a disappointing revelation of your character. I actually enjoy (most of) your insightful posts on charting/price action. But you appear to be a trader who is fickle. On the question of whether solg might ever reach £14.80 or GGP might ever reach 66p a share...on balance I would say there’s more tangible OBJECTIVE evidence in favour of former fantasy than latter (at this point in time, with available data, although both are utter fantasies). I m sure you are a data kinda person as you enjoy charts, so please feel free to refute these rubbish armchair CEO type comments with some data and astute insights on GGP potential and solg ceiling :) Post the GGP insights on the GGP board, and share the Solg insights on the solg bb please. Good luck

Spot on Italian. Ggp has 3.225billion shares and is a 55m Mcap. If solg ever ended up with 3.2b shares, it would be fully funding its share (circa 60%) of Cascabel into production. (1/3 equity 2/3 debt of 60% of £3b capex roughly) Let’s think about that for a minute. Revenue would be north of $2 billion per annum, at 40mtpa at just .90% Cueq. No windfall tax till five years after all costs recouped (if ever as it’s possibly gone by then). Then put the high grade core of say 1.5% and the numbers fall off the calculator. DYOR.

Ship you beat me to it. NM has commented that BN can be expected to have a couple of ounces gold per tonne. The cieleto vein was seen running the entire 10km strike length. Think that will blow ggp assays out of the water..if it doesn’t, i m certain one of the other nine projects will; apples and oranges: IOCG deposit vs Porphyry. But point taken Filthy about getting in early in commodity shares; beginning 2015-16: that was the time to buy in for multi bagger gains. People like rick rule claim we are still a long way away from the previous peaks, we ll see...

Fully agree Cityal. Optimist, thank you for posting pertinent sector info. Innovative trials by geocurve include: Trial with water company to survey containers/restricted areas Trial with AVIVA to survey/inspect historic buildings Trial to survey/inspect roof tops/water towers for water co Trial with HH to survey flood defenses Trial with AECOM to survey airport runways Trial to demonstrate VR survey deliverable to water company Client list goes on....Q4 tends to be busiest in surveying annual cycle. H1 18 was only the start of what NB has described as a “spectacular turnaround” story. GyroMetric is zero value in share price at moment. Running a trial with a “major” turbine manufacturer, at the world class ORE catapult facility. A business being built gradually. Just my opinions here. DYOR. Good luck all

“...poorly capitalised exploration company”. That’s rubbish.

The recent Solg annual report states Solgold has applied for drilling permits on five of the concessions. CGP states that the EIS was submitted for brahmaderos in early 2018. Then, they submitted an amended EIS. I think the ministry and govt have to weight up each application, against the local community’s opinions, resistance if any, environmental impact could be different in each region obviously. So I don’t think it’s a matter of being in a queue, awaiting the permit/s. Some of the land inc with Brahmaderos was associated with Ascendent Resources. They got chased out of Ecuador, and their concession rights (for different concessions) were terminated over 2 decades ago (by Correas no less). Communities don’t forget history, esp mining in Ecuador. The name change (to Sunstone), the time frame taken awaiting permitting, would suggest some issues. We never know exactly what’s happening on the ground, ref communities, local land owners. Mining exploration rights are distinct from land ownership, and I reckon the land owners/communities can create significant challenges (legal and practical) for exploration cos, if they choose to (whether it’s CGP or Solg). I don’t know if there any issues with Brahmaderos, or whether Solg will get the drilling permits. IMHO Solg will get the permits between Q1-Q2 19. So I d expect drilling in Q2-Q3 19.

I love Pads version of his name lol

There’s a story about a fox and sour grapes..

I don’t know persimmon, wasn’t invested. I m invested here, I know the company to the extent a PI can, trust my own diligence and I have confidence in the BOD. CEO integrity matters, more than the asset, more than jurisdiction, more than anything else. If you don’t trust the CEO, you should reconsider your position. But I bet you won’t. Because you know a take over will come one day, and it will be crafted by the same hard working hands that have helped build this co ground up. Everyone should DYOR. Good luck all

PS: it will of course be interesting to see how voting goes at next AGM, how parties align and whether Irwin party gets any traction (they opposed the previous options from what I remember). Keep opposing till you get diluted out ;-)

My two pence on the options: I think those working hard on the ground scanning hundreds of kilometres of mountainous terrain by foot, getting paid average wages (look at financial reports), deserve their share of the pie. Many of these employees probably have lived locally for generations, they own what’s in that land, I dare say a little more rightfully than you and me shareholders. More importantly no one gives a rats *** what anyone here votes. This voice of dissent is pointless. Some are ?traders euphemising as share holder activists, imho. The major holders and seasoned BOD make the decisions (thank goodness for that) All imho only. There’s a larger strategy playing out to achieve value for ALL and of course it cannot be given away. Good luck all

Strider: let’s agree to disagree on BU. His first few posts here were about the gold being too deep, that RNSs are repeating the same stuff with zero impact, that CNR has superb grades near surface etc. One could say his ignorance on the fundamentals here was equally matched by his sharp insights on the technical side. Unfortunately folks here have a good memory, regardless of posting history being deleted by lse. It’s one thing to gloat over your TA predictions being accurate, quite another to try deramp the fundamentals to support your arguments. What he, you, me or anyone else says is irrelevant anyways.

GV: there were 1.7b, then 100m and lastly today’s options, takes me to 1.837? I don’t see how it went to 1.9b. Could be wrong

GV: there was a dispute with Major Drilling service mentioned in recent MD&A...might have delayed things a bit. Secondly different rock compositions diorite vs andesite with different hardness, might affect drill rates. Only guessing

No worries Tuju. One more thing: solg is an explorer seeking orebodies containing gold, copper, zinc, moly and silver. Take your pick ;-)

Haha. The gold is too deep was what he said. This character was trying to deramp solg and comparing it to another explorer. Care to talk about that chart or the prospects there? The gold is too deep. Grades are poor. That’s why the worlds BIGGEST miner has taken a stake and signed a strategic agreement at such a speed. Read that statement again. Let it sink in. We also have Blackrock, NCM, BHP, apart from DGR, Tenstar, CGP and several other funds taking chunks. We have plenty of good Chartists who can call it like they see it, minus the attitude. DYOR. Good luck all

Add: does it look like NM has had things dictated to him so far, ref BHP and NCM? For all the bravado posted over the last two years about BHP doing hostile take overs, having the financial prowess etc, why hasn’t it happened? Do people think a major can just move into a jurisdiction like Ecuador (which still has high risks imho), throw money, squash resistance and get a mine going? Then why hasn’t it happened for the last few decades? So things have changed. How many active drill programs has BHP and NCM got in Ecuador, given they bought in auction and could do the same as any junior explorer? And why has solg put so much time, effort and energy into CSR? You reckon bhp can just “buy” that team too? Exploring is risky business and there are solid reasons the majors historically leave it to juniors. Juniors like solg are super efficient at it. The majors wait patiently, pay fair value but get in derisked. That’s what the bod and shareholders prefer. Their risk appetites are low. These majors need solg more than solg needs them. Solg has a choice about going to another major. All imho. DYOR.

Morning folks..I live in cloud cuckoo land :) Solg as junior partner with NCM and BHP tripartite partnership, lead operator undecided. That’s the message I got from that article. Dyor. Good luck all

The facts are there for all to examine. Only two big turbine manufacturers supplying to UK offshore as far as I know : Siemens Gamesa and MHI Vestas. Gyrometric has stated a trial is commencing with a “big turbine manufacturer”. Plus “strong” enquiries from numerous other manufacturers (ALL three major chinese manufacturers, and let’s face it, if you are ignoring China as a market, you are missing a big chunk going forwards). Intellectual property developed over decades of research, ie proprietary software and algorithms, towards interpreting the IME data. Sectors include maritime, manufacturing, wind and nuclear. Geocurve: how many AIM Cos can name so many behemoths amongst their clients? Stantec, Royal Haskoning, Jacobs, AECOM, Vinci, Ringway Jacobs, AVIVA, HH, Barhale, numerous water Cos/alliances contributing to AMP6, Aggregate Industries... The sectors are all topical and on the cusp of growth. AI, Data analytics, connecting the physical with the digital (ex BIM), UAV applications, off shore wind energy.... It’s a matter of patience. And there is very little of that around imho. People are obsessed with daily share price rather than value. From certain bankruptcy to near break even in 6 months. So what can the next year or two achieve? No rainbows here, just solid business being built from ground up. DYOR. Good luck all

Bones: I have been quiet on lse. But still reading up on sectors, the co and usual digging. Things are well here-that’s my perception, it’s taking time to turn into tangible progress, that’s all. Data analytics and digitalising is a big deal and we are in the thick of it. :-)