Member Info for loskins

Antibody testing should be an integral part of the testing process, I'd feel much more confident sitting next to somebody on plane knowing that they had been tested for high immune response to Covid rather than someone who had the vaccine 6 months ago.

The Times is just digging up old news in light of the Owen Paterson debacle, not relevant to ABDX predicament.

A the start of the pandemic MP lobbies parliament for contracts to supply testing kits on the behalf of Randox laboratories whilst been employed on their books as a consultant. Randox duly receives contracts valued at £450m, yet the GLP have no mention of this obvious collusion of interests on the website..oh no..they would rather take on a company that has put huge resources and money into creating a top line product that has been utilised by the DHSC yet never been payed a penny for...leaving ABDX in the dire situation we see them in now..60% below IPO value.

Got a sniff of what Avacta got this morning, I am finding it all totally illogical. Avacta design gold standard test, ABDX to manufacture such test..Government continue to deny access to market and carry on importing from China and GLP continue to discredit UK companies for helping out in a pandemic emergency. You really couldn't make it up..Uk Diagnostics has been well and truly stitched up kicked in the b*****x

Frustrating to see considering all the potential upcoming news flow, all Covid stocks seem to have been rather quiet as of late. Hopefully they will all rise unison with a bumper RNS, Avacta or Vatic TT would certainly be a step in the right direction.

Excellent Post yet again Muck165, your right to highlight paragraph 39 as an issue of both concern and possible optimism. It looks like GLP have to re-amend their argument in regards to state aid.

Backed up by an extract from para 32 which looks like have trimmed down their original accusations.

"The Claimant's application was originally far too wide in any event, and has been narrowed a great deal".

Good to see them getting scolded for damaging Professor John Bell's reputation. Para 38

"He feels somewhat aggrieved that work he undertook with the national interest in mind, without remuneration, has led to the degree and type of criticism now directed at him. I exempt counsel on all sides from the following observation, but it seems to me that there is a degree of heat and intensity in these proceedings that has no place in litigation. Emotions appear, in some quarters, to be running somewhat high".

Ukregulator
I've studied this quite extensively, if I hadn't have caught Covid I may well have gone ahead and had the vaccine though I am against the blanket coverage of its usage especially in young children. On its initial introduction it was quite rightly adopted to help protect the old and the vulnerable though over time the goalposts have changed and its starting to impact on people's civil liberties and unfortunately in some cases their livelihoods.

"I'm not vaccinated, my reasoning was that after I caught Covid last October, I was of the opinion that I had the antibodies to fight of a reinfection so why have a vaccine..."

Because any antibodies wane over time. Having Covid doesn't protect you from future reinfection.

Study of 176 patients post Sars infection done in 2007 indicates 95% positive immune response 3 years on from having the virus
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2851497/

...which to be honest doesn't offer the same protection as natural infection."

I'd be interested in your clinical evidence for that claim.

Results from a recent Israeli study indicate that vaccinees have a 13 fold or 95% chance of a breakthrough infection in comparison to those who have natural immunity

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.08.24.21262415v1

I'm not vaccinated, my reasoning was that after I caught Covid last October, I was of the opinion that I had the antibodies to fight of a reinfection so why have a vaccine which to be honest doesn't offer the same protection as natural infection. One of the main reasons for investing in ABDX was that they were bringing to market a damn good antibody test which I saw was a logical step to getting the country back on it's feet again. The government seem to think otherwise pushing vaccination above testing. I see it as just as important to understand your antibody status as you can then make an informed choice on future vaccinations. The unvaccinated seem to be getting stigmatised as the spreaders of the virus when this is simply not the case as we all know that vaccinated people are just as prevalent spreaders. I am now 1 of 2 people in our workforce of 60 who are unvaccinated. My decision not to be vaccinated has been vindicated after taking a test one year on from having Covid which indicated that I had extremely high antibiotic response to fighting a Covid reinfection. Surely this is way forward !!

https://www.find-travel-test-provider.service.gov.uk/providers#list-of-test-providers
Is this it ?

It's ironic how many come from China !

My partner works in numerous schools, she has noticed that they seemed to have ditched Innova LFT's in favour of a flowflex. Quick view on their website indicates they are the sole distributor for the UK/EU, product sourced from ACON laboratories in the US...and "surprise surprise "as Cilla would say manufactured in China. Check out the home use certificate on the Flowflex website...you couldn't make it up from one cheap chinese product to another....when are the government going to invest UK diagnostics like they said they would ?....not feeling too optimistic about Friday's list

Always good to see, though we might see a run on ABDX this afternoon considering forthcoming newsflow.

Well and truly shafted..makes me feel sick in the stomach..total crooks..I'm not investing in AIM anymore...sold pretty much all my AIM stocks today..it's just one big casino..I've big investing for over 12 years and this one goes down as one the biggest scams I've witnessed..totally disgusted

and down we go...wish i'd gone with my gut last week and sold up. Think the talk of additional fundraising has put wind up shareholders...im out

Blimey this share's an abomination, it really is !! Next leg down anyone ffs..

Agreed, market is so fickle nowadays. I can't recall the last time I saw a share rise off the back of a set of interim results. Hopefully convert some of the large pipeline/upside opportunities into genuine sales. Larry is insinuating upcoming orders. Fingers crossed.

Obviously struggling to commercialise DGW, but on the plus side cash position is better than I thought it would be...back in the bottom draw she goes again

Lots of hearsay and rumour...but not much substance or factual evidence.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1qX72qFI4j3lsDugNIetd1icv-EAsQQdP/view

Not happening at here at all, where's all the optimism gone from last year...zero records of any large scale sales in the past 9 months..I'm teetering here on the brink of selling up. Plenty of large sales going through and reductions in shareholdings..

Results on Wednesday, maybe time to raise some cash also. Doesn't look like its going to be at a premium. I still say 3m at 1.50p