Member Info for LONGWAIT

@LW 'There are some seriously sick people visiting these forums'
it really does beggar belief...

If you look at 22tmf's comments on RKH, he accuses the company of being a scam, the directors of being crooks and thieves, 'A dodgy company run by dodgy people'.

He said that he paid 38p and the SP will never reach that 'in a million years,' yet six weeks later, it reached 21p.

His posts are paranoid and psychopathic and the fact that he hasn't been banned reflects shame on the administrators here.

' Our risked valuation currently stands at 53.7p/share.'

https://www.edisongroup.com/company/rockhopper-exploration/599/

RKH shares are trading at a discount of 68 percent to its risked NAV and 22tmf says it's a scam.

What happened to Kerogen's 16 percent holding?

According to

https://www.marketscreener.com/HURRICANE-ENERGY-PLC-15724803/company/

IIs hold 47 percent, although they have a different-sized holding for Hargreaves Lansdown Stockbrokers from yours.

I'm proud to say that I was one of the 21 (note, Double, the casino symbolism) people who have so far given your post +1.

It's time to deal with a certain notorious poster here, who today advised regular contributors to 'grow a pair.'
He said the same thing to me personally, by putting the words in the heading of a new thread on JOG two days ago.
That was his way of retaliating to my posts pointing out that he tried to panic shareholders into selling JOG last year when it was about 60p (it subsequently hit 240p) by predicting a placing in the 40s and a fall to the low 30s, followed by receivership.
JOG's NAV is 4216p, but he isn't impressed.
I and two other regular posters (there are very few there) have told him at length that he is completely out-of-order, as well as being completely wrong - and I am grateful to downbuttnotout for his support too.

I have just noticed that the thread, in whose title insulting remarks were made about gender and genitals, has been removed, but I have kept screenshots of it.

The same poster accused us JOG investors of being 'paid rampers who would rob their own granny if given half a chance' and also accused four posters of 'trying to sucker newbies in.'

There are some seriously sick people visiting these forums.

RE: This morning’s RNS
29 Mar 2019 10:04
Joe,
I've tried too and lost the plot.
The way I see it is that they are dependent on getting production going and hence revenue by the summer otherwise I guess there's gonna be a fund raise or maybe sell off of additional licenses.
Prospects are good but things have yet to be proven.
(IvaP on HUR when the price was 45.84 p)

Things have been proven and prospects are good.
What makes you think the share price should be 10p rather than 45p?

I have a holding in SQZ too, DU.

A regular poster on HUR tipped it at 23p.
I 'decided' to make a big investment in it at 28p, but didn't.
When it hit 30p, I wondered whether it was taking off.
That is precisely the situation in which I would years ago have been 'sucked in' to a bad company, but in this case I hesitated.
It was on a P/E of two, which is why I thought the tipster could be right, but I asked myself whether their one producing asset could go wrong.
I knew I had missed my chance when trading was suspended.
Posters were excited , with one saying it had to return at 4 times the price at suspension.
I did manage to buy some at double, i.e. 56p.
I'm still holding, but see it more as a missed opportunity than a success.

Since RG has been in the habit of selling three or so lots of 10,000 shares in a day, it is plausible that the three lots sold yesterday morning were his.
He has definitely not sold any yet this morning and, if he is planning to sell another million shares, he seems to be taking his time.
I doubt that he will sell any at below 100p, but if he does then it is extremely unlikely to be a million shares.
Sorry, DU, but TSD isn't interested in facts and his comments are the very opposite of facts.

If the share price doubled to 1.25 p on the drilling results, I would recover my losses.
You would have much explaining to do, but my guess is that you would just carry on ramping up the share as you've been doing.
Reading your posts reminds me of the diary entries of a certain notorious propagandist, who also had names for people who disagreed with him and whose comments also demonstrated how out-of-touch he was with reality.

Horse Hill site 1 worth 21p
30 Dec 2019 11:28
As shown earlier this morning the first UKOG site at Horse Hill with the current six production well approved plan is worth at least 21p per share.
This could be delivered in the first half of 2020.

RE: Bounce
31 Jan 2020 11:01
... the trolls are trying to hard to get the best price possible..... 10p is going to see me retiring now :-)
And that's by year end easy with the way UKOG are setting thing up.

RE: Bounce
31 Jan 2020 13:11
... us long term investors have the trolls to thank for being able to buy cheap and make even more money... the share price will take care of itself ... Easy pickings at this level... thanks :-)

RE: Bounce
31 Jan 2020 14:23
anything below 3p will be a bargain come year end.

RE: 10p in February
02 Feb 2020 16:34
Absolutely Free, fair value will be 10p on 1000bopd with the potential of this emerging giant.

RE: 10p in February
02 Feb 2020 16:42
Absolutely and well beyond 20p in time.
5p - 10p in the short term.

13 Feb 2020 07:39
5p -10p in no time just like 2017 ...
Simples.
Ignore the trolls.

RE: Price rise
14 Feb 2020 07:42
... Maybe 14p when big money starts flooding in on thos 1000+bopd results.

RE: Stocks
14 Feb 2020 07:45
When it hits 8p later this year people will be talking of when it will hit 20p.

They are all oil tankers
17 Feb 2020 16:44
... 5p-10p in no time when 1300+bopd flows are reported.

RE: They are all oil tankers
17 Feb 2020 18:48
.... £1 per share is certainly doable!!!

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/feb/19/germans-divided-plans-tesla-electric-car-factory-environmentalists-tree-felling

German environmentalists and political leaders are at loggerheads over plans to build a Tesla electric car factory on the site of woodland outside Berlin ...

On Sunday a court order forced a halt to an operation to clear 92 hectares of pine trees at the site in Grünheide, 24 miles (38km) east of Berlin.

'my call for oil price is ... i got oil price resistance bang on ... it may got higher it may not ... i need that gap filling to 21p ... i reduced a wee bit at 16.46p. probably a mistake selling at a loss i know ...'

I do hope you're not planning to post copies of your broker's notifications of your transactions too.
By the way, we are aware that prices can move in either of two directions (although on AIM it is sometimes hard to tell).
That's why we're still here.

I haven't found it so far, but while I was looking for it, I came across a comment on ADVFN, posted just over three years ago.
The grammar was so bad that I dare not show it to the Grammar Police, but he was lamenting the fact that the SP hadn't moved on the 'Lincoln result' and had stayed at 47p, thus valuing Lincoln at zero.

Poor fellow didn't realise how well off he was.

Do you have any more information about the article alleging that HUR is 'struggling to be a reliable oil producer,' Blue-Eyes?

It sounds remarkably similar to James Hosie of Barclays, quoted by IC:

'Barclays analyst James Hosie said the abandonment was bad news for Hurricane’s ambition to be a stable producer. “[This year] was supposed to be when Hurricane provided the tangible data points needed to elevate the stock from a basement reservoir concept with niche investor appeal into an established UK oil production growth business,” he said. Mr Hosie said the company’s path to medium-term cash flow had stalled.'

https://www.investorschronicle.co.uk/shares/2020/02/07/hurricane-in-rough-spell/

The 'abandonment' refers to 'the decision to abandon the Lincoln Crestal well.'

'what happens if they drill the other strata for oil as stated? Will they find more gas there?'

Very good question!

' if you develop Barryroe as an oil field what happens to the gas that comes out with it?'

But you're not suggesting drilling deeper in Barryroe only to look for gas - are you?

That's interesting, CS, as I do remember the poster pijoe1212 by name and had an uneasy feeling about it.

In fairness to him, he did criticise Ashcroft's article, describing it as a comparison of 'apples with snowballs' and he did assert in a post nearly 18 months ago, 'i am not a liar'.

It does rather look as though the 'additional' companies are focusing on the gas because of the political developments in Ireland.

You misunderstood me, Double!

I don't agree with EVERYTHING you write; I meant I agree with everything you wrote in that post of yours.
But I am in a mental institution of a sort - the one known as AIM, with (some) delusional posters and attending scribblers and crazy prices.

You obviously know much more about the licences than I do, DU.
I too am hopeful that JOG will win more, which means the shares will offer even more potential, and I too am hopeful - in spite of my screen name - that we won't have to wait too long for farm-out news.

I am wary though that winning more licences without securing farm-outs will not deter JOG's detractors from saying that they'll never get the oil out of the ground.

It will be interesting to see how the SP reacts to either kind of good news.

I agree with everything you write, Double.
JoeSoap's article reminds me of Jamie Ashcroft's and James Hosie's - it's just amazing how well they are crafted to make it look as though things have gone so badly for HUR.
E.g., 'Then Whirlwind.'
Yes, Joe, Whirlwind was too much - the final straw, after the ever-growing 'water cuts', the huge 'debt', the 'falling' production, the 'unstable' production, the 'dependence' on financiers and corporate rainmakers.
I could just about carry on, in spite of those, and even after the 'failure' of the GWA drilling campaign, but after Whirlwind ...

'they have decided to infest this board with their dubious investing expertise and bogus and flawed financial advice.'

Are you going to identify them?

'I meant that you don't want debate with the people you don't agree, you just filter them or try to ban don't you??? ;o)'

Anyone can look back over the last few days and see comments from sympathetic posters, advising me not to argue with disruptive posters, so no - it's quite obvious that I don't 'just filter' people with whom I disagree.

As for SueMay1 and BeartriceTomson, I doubt whether anyone is under the illusion that they were banned merely for having the audacity to disagree with LONGWAIT.

'I guess you try to protect your investment don't you?? '

What are you implying - that I am secretly shorting this share?