Member Info for longtimeinvestor

Toff

is a prune your alterative to gamble .

What do you class Money put into Met1 as ?

btw I have a large portfolio to jeep an eye on, which I do on a daily basis. It makes no difference to me posting here at the same time

Dust

I am here for the same reason as I first came here - to state some facts - hopefully more people like onb sold out after my posting some facts that have saved them a lot of money. Those that ignored the fundamentals such as a forward market cap going beyond £400 million, only have their own stupidity to blame.

Toff

'' you think its a gamble''

feel free to use your own word

Dust

''Its not been an enjoyable experience watching this, for its investors''

the people who injected money in Met1 then moved onto MAST taking vast profits with them from the gullible, have had a very enjoyable experience which they are now duplicating.

Meanwhile market makers making good money each week from the spread in the gamblers purchasing and dumping activities.

They are very content seeing a share price staying in a very tight range.

Meanwhile market makers making good money each week from the spread in the gamblers purchasing and dumping activities.

They are very content seeing a share price staying in a very tight range.

Dust

''3.5p looks the base''

very few people would have invested under 3.5p making it a resistance level. Any further deterioration in outlook such as running out of cash can see resistance levels broken even if it means the very low current purchasers selling at a loss.

Dust

''3.5p looks the base''

very few people would have invested under 3.5p making it a resistance level. Any further deterioration in outlook such as running out of cash can see resistance levels broken even if it means the very low current purchasers selling at a loss.

Dust

''thats operating with investor funds ''

the very short term investors (warrant holders) injected money.

The current investors bought the previous short term holders invested money from them, paying many multiples in cash to purchase cash.

Descent

ONB

'' I firmly believe the placing and warrants and subsequent paid hype was a fraud designed only to enrich the financers, which I assume may have included some of the departed board members''

You obviously was not aware of the fundamentals when you purchased in the 20's.

Hopefully my giving the facts over and over saved some a lot of money by exiting at high price levels before the obvious decent to very low prices.

MrR

''just in case there may be some real information in relation to my gambling investment!''

I have relentlessly given real information to gamblers over and over from when the share price was many multiples of the current share price, basically saying they were in a scam, and with mainly the kind of responses that you would expect from such gamblers.

Unfortunately someone like ONB is constantly battling against obvious logic and keeps trying to fabricate as some sort of distraction and a way to justify his bad mistake of being duped into gambling, by his not understanding the fundamentals. It was always obvious that the share price was heading back to a very low share price even when in the 50's.

As I have said a number of times already, the same thing is being played out with MAST with the share price having been at over £2 per share. It is the gamblers who own Met1 that are in control of the share price.

At least 99% of gamblers will be underwater.

MrR

''just in case there may be some real information in relation to my gambling investment!''

I have relentlessly given real information to gamblers over and over from when the share price was many multiples of the current share price, basically saying they were in a scam, and with mainly the kind of responses that you would expect from such gamblers.

Unfortunately someone like ONB is constantly battling against obvious logic and keeps trying to fabricate as some sort of distraction and a way to justify his bad mistake of being duped into gambling, by his not understanding the fundamentals. It was always obvious that the share price was heading back to a very low share price even when in the 50's.

As I have said a number of times already, the same thing is being played out with MAST with the share price having been at over £2 per share. It is the gamblers who own Met1 that are in control of the share price.

At least 99% of gamblers will be underwater.

Onb

''''most of us paid two or three times the NAV of the company.''

what a JOKE of a statement

and now

''that the majority of current shareholders are only those who bought in relatively recently''

another JOKE of a statement - so everyone who bought at between 5 -55p have sold out

Onb

''Q "Where have I mentioned about market makers and their pricing?"

A: How about where you say also below "it is up to a market maker if they wish to take a position for their own account in a stock, but that will not be the case with Met1."''

Another screw loose moment for you, quoting from the same post. In any case one has nothing to do with the other. Not only do you lie you also have comprehension issues.

''Q:" Where have I said that ALL transactions are matched on an order book matching system?"

A: ISn't that what this means: "that will not be the case with Met1. No market maker would be stupid enough to buy and keep for their own account ".

Yet again you have comprehension issues

Market makers would provide obligatory liquidity, Buying for their own account is separate matter with difference disclosure levels. Market makers shares would show up on level 2

''do you really think the market makers are so lacking in greed they would not have been in on the ride as well''

Your DESPERATION is palpable.

A market maker has not been on the top shareholders list of Met1 if they were gambling on their own account.

They have no need to gamble in a NO revenue business, They will be making thousands each week on the spread.

It is the stupid gullible gamblers such as yourself that will determine the share price movements, as they are the owners of the vast majority of Met1.

''do please spell out exactly what ARE the alleged lies,''

you really are totally stupid - I have already stated your lies on replies

ONB

you have a screw loose.

why do you insist on fabrication after fabrication and at the same time trying to divert your way out of previous lies and my replies.

''the first piece he finds which states that MMs don't move the market''

''Calling me a liar with no evidence for the 4th time''

The evidence is the fact that I have asked you to show the posts where I have stated your lies but you have failed to do so on each occasion.

You have serious issues

''most of us paid two or three times the NAV of the company.''

what a JOKE of a statement - totally clueless . Met1 is still well over double tnav and the share price had reached 55p

Cannot see a market maker on the Met1 shareholders list holding shares for their own account, which would fall outside those shares held for market making purposes. NOT a surprise

Onb

'' I have never before met someone who rejects the evidence of his own words,''

I repeat yet again - you are a LIAR

Where have I said that ALL transactions are matched on an order book matching system?

Where have I mentioned about market makers and their pricing?

Once again market makers will be holding sufficient shares for their obligation to provide liquidity when needed and will make their money by the spread.

''showing both your belief that MMs never take positions themselves which control prices''

Yet again another LIE - it is up to a market maker if they wish to take a position for their own account in a stock, but that will not be the case with Met1. No market maker would be stupid enough to buy and keep for their own account many many millions of Met1 shares with a cost at a massive premium to tnav im a NO revenue stock- all but the dumb would realise that. Market makers would not be as dumb as the stupid gullible gamblers which includes you, paying between a 100% and 3,100% above tnav.

The only people controlling the Met1 share price now are the stupid gullible gamblers who were responsible for controlling the share price up to 55p, and then the warrant holders controlled the share price all the way down until they had got rid of all of their shares to move onto the next killing at the expense of the next group of stupid gullible gamblers.

Your brain is mis wired/deteriorated

ONB

and?

proves my point - you LIED when you said -

''the idiot who wrote that all MEt1 buys and were computer matched, that market makers don’t move the share price''

you cannot find anything to match the above because you LIED.

I shall repeat.

SETS is an order book matching system. Market makers are virtually redundant when it comes to large ftse 100 stocks.

High volume Aim stocks can also use an order book match based and mm system. In the case of Met1 there was a period of massive volumes around the 80 to 100 million shares a day. In those periods an order book matching process would have been used. Market makers would not have been holding hundreds of millions of shares.

Now that the large volumes have gone from warrant holders getting rid of their shares, market markers will be used more to provide liquidity as I had previously said. They will be holding just the requirements to provide liquidity and make their money on the spread.

Onb

and once again I repeat - you are a LIAR