Member Info for longtimeinvestor

Toff

I am replying to constant nonsense from people like you.

I suggest you try to think before posting on this board.

Toff

You appear to have a problem with counting/percentages .

I suggest you calculate your own percentage of Met1 related posts - so few

Toff

yet another non met1 related post from you.

I do not have a problem - I have explained a few times already - totally out of my hands

Toff

I think you will find the vast majority of my posts have been about Met1 -

the same cannot be said about YOU.

I suggest you take your non Met1 related posts elsewhere

Bow

''you aren't helping the sp''

another weird comment.

It is ONLY the gambler owners of Met1 who will determine a share price /market cap- NO ONE else.

atm there are enough gamblers who are still supporting a valuation of 100% + over tnav

Bow

''you aren't helping the sp''

another weird comment.

It is ONLY the gambler owners of Met1 who will determine a share price /market cap- NO ONE else.

atm there are enough gamblers who are still supporting a valuation of 100% + over tnav

Itd

Jack should have a good idea as he did research before buying.

MAST hit sub 20p today (18p) - has been a very fast decline - the question now is will shareholders continue to hand over vast profits to warrant holders at the current level over the coming weeks

Jack

You appear to be going off track.

'' I’m sorry that you can’t sleep at night with the thought of a stranger taking a risk on an investment.''

Just as I said.

What an utterly weird thing to say.

I came here when at a high share price to give facts, and to open the minds of some that had a closed 'riches on the horizon' mind. It was up to the individual as to whether they had a change of mind on their gamble or not.

I have said many times that it is gamblers that own the vast majority of shares and so the price of each share is in their hands.

I have also said that after being given the facts that I don't care how much money gamblers have thrown at it or how much they are currently down.

Why do you think otherwise?

For each 1p that has been gambled by 'MET1 gamblers trust/fund/investment company ' in it's increasing lottery ticket portfolio, you have paid a great deal more than that.

Jack

btw

''LONG TERM POTENTIAL''

does not equal ''Which means I believe I bought in at the right time''

There are many gamblers in Met1 who bought at various price levels with most of them now thinking that that have not bought at the right time.

Long term potential of a business is not the same as a price paid for a share in it.

Jack

btw

''LONG TERM POTENTIAL''

does not equal ''Which means I believe I bought in at the right time''

There are many gamblers in Met1 who bought at various price levels with most of them now thinking that that have not bought at the right time.

Long term potential of a business is not the same as a price paid for a share in it.

Jack

Thinking that a lottery ticket of a stock will prove to give a return and the price paid for that hope are two different things.

You have bought at over a 100% premium.

Jack

again - no you didn't - I had to assume an answer, which is that you have bought at a price that after research, you consider good value and therefore not overpaid .

Jb

''To the real investors here and those that have the right to be here''

You have seriously lost the plot - you need to be examined.

Toff

'' spends most of their time on here talking about MAST''

'' One seriously mixed up contributor.''

You certainly are - you appear not to know the difference between MET1 and MAST

Tof

''Strangest thing is he/she doesn't post on the MAST board.''

why would I want to do that?

I gave my reasons why I came to the MET1 board and it did not involve Mast.

I have also stated that I was not going to repeat the warnings that I have given about Met1 again about Mast on the Mast board as I had no connection to Mast.

I have also posted for the gamblers on here that if that could have found a way to short Mast then that would be worth looking into.

Jack

You didn't answer the question, so the obvious assumption is that after your research you bought at what you considered a good value price.

Tof

'' You have started a new thread''

The post from onb part of which referred to Mast was not on a specific Mast related thread, so I made my follow up just that - understand?

Jack

''I’m a genuine investor who’s done his research on MET1 and see long term potential.''

So after your research you thought that you had invested at a good price?

The current price is still 100% above tnav

??

my post of Oct 8th which I have followed up on was in response to the post from ONB on this board

Since my post of just 4 days ago MAST has plummeted even more to currently stand at about 24p