Member Info for longtimeinvestor

hu
''Then you later amend that''
I haven't amended anything, I gave you the fact that 98.46% of votes were in favour of an investment - I have NOT amended it.

The 'bothered to vote is the same as a general election - a candidate gets a certain percentage of votes from those that were bothered to vote. That vote would be a lower percentage of those eligible to vote in the constituency but did not bother to vote.
Easy enough for most to understand.

''Another example of you twisting and manipulating the narrative as you go to suit.''

Once again complete nonsense from you NO twisting JUST the facts.
stop digging

hu
''You are twisting the narrative again''

I am not twisting anything - I have quoted you -
''an Institution is voting on behalf of the investors whose shares are held in the Nominee Account, and it is they who vote in favour of a buyback''

I suggest anyone who does not want Lloyds to be investing in Lloyds shares at 30% below book value, contact their nominee provider to see if they would vote on your behalf.
I would suggest that it is the minority of shareholders that complain about this investment on platforms such as this making it appear that most are against the investment.
There will be silence from most of the majority

hu
I have given you the facts - end of - if you do not like the facts then tough

for a buyback

hu
''an Institution is voting on behalf of the investors whose shares are held in the Nominee Account, and it is they who vote in favour of a buyback''

what nonsense - why on earth would HL as an example be voting at an AGM using nominee account shares.

https://www.irmagazine.com/tech-social-media/hargreaves-lansdown-offers-online-agm-voting-uk-and-european-companies#:~:text=The%20change%20comes%20as%20brokers,has%20not%20been%20passed%20on.

hu
I am giving you the facts - some people do not like the facts.

hu
for those who bothered to vote- about two thirds of shares in issue were in favour of an investment in lloyds shares

98.46% of votes were in favour of an investment in Lloyds - respect it - get over it.

hu
you can get voting rights with the right provider

1.54% of votes were against an investment in Lloyds.

cook
re 7.48 - your usual drivel.

Lloyds pays well above an average dividend already.

If Lloyds were making an external investment at 30% below book value,I would think there would be very few moans, but somehow making an investment at 30% below book valuer in Lloyds is somehow bad in the eyes of the few - 1.54% of votes were against an investment in Lloyds.

Maybe you would prefer that Lloyds BOD made no investments at all?
you have a sell button

as in 19:44, hence 19:46 reply

dor
''why is my percentage ownership of lloyds not increasing?''

it is unless you have sold shares

my 19.35 post btw is to say i have said many times already why percentage ownership is increased

dor
''I did when I posted''

??
don't think so.

why is my percentage ownership of lloyds not increasing?

dor
I have done so at least a dozen times, but clearly you do not know where I am coming from because as I have already said, you do not follow the posts.

dor
''even if you may not agree fully with them.''

well you would have to give a reason as to why ''My percentage ownership of Lloyds banking Group is increasing'' is not the case first don't you think -
otherwise what am i not agreeing with?

dor
you said you know where i am coming from and i replied clearly not because you do not read the board -
what is wrong with that? - grow up