Member Info for Lobon

and the fallout from it being kicked down the road would be the possibility of it being lost to a third party due to inactivity on the tenament .
this way hum will have a big say in cora's future regardless of what they discover at extremely low risk to HUM shareholders.

yes barn , i agree also . the posters that cast objections i really do see their points and all but all of them are respected posters here and have created good value in what they post here without questions

however its ok to disagree

i would just like to point out that buybacks and dividends do NOT guarantee SP growth as posters here suggest. this is AIM after all . however it will happen here i believe in the not too distant future.
then BNKR will be forgotten and we will all be skipping through the daisies hand in hand .... tralalala
like it or lump it the world doesn't revolve around a bunch or moaning PI's wether thats me or you , yes they can do things better can't we all?
it actually revolves around the people that make the decisions , being adaptive and reactive to opportunity sometimes reaps rewards even if its not located in west africa or not gold.
right now its arms length , however some here are talking if hum have give them a blank cheque. can't you just take that for what it is?
stupid question.....probably not

have a great day x

get real ...... they have invested less than 1% of the market cap in a project. its pretty standard procedure to hedge a cash position for a worthwhile return. in any line of business big or small , christ i do it myself with currency, stocks and now moving into property.
i find it laughable at the reaction , pretty sure dan and his now excellent team he has brought together know implicitly what they are doing. i trust their judgement with however they pursue BNKR going forward.
modern mining techniques mitigate risk here as best than can be achieved as i laid out yesterday and if numbers add up then its worthwhile taking a stake , if not walk away and collect a healthy return.
so all in all please email dan and his team and point out what minerals you approve of being mined and in what location in west africa.... that would be one ridiculous email wouldn't it?
ultimately if you are not happy with hums strategy there is another solution , perhaps thats already happened and we protest too much?

ttbt
i totally understand your view point regards lawsuits ect however its sort of a trade off against operating solely in africa and all the risk that that brings although different against operating in USA. sort of evens itself out does it not , cus i can find more potential risks .which in my opinion HUM have certainly done their best in mitigating the operational risk in mali.
i have no reason to believe they can't do it again , in a mining friendly territory

there are other mining operations locally to bunker hill , with minimal issues
the crescent mine run by crescent silver silver /gold
the sunshine mine is run by sunshine silver silver /gold

modern mining standards are a million miles away from 70-80's mining techniques.waste management and dust control is pretty high up on most responsible resource companies. i've pretty much seen it with my own two eyes.
you also earlier referred to the bunker hill mine itself was the issue with pollutants and effecting childrens health when in fact it was the onsite smelter that caused the issue. the smelting process creates high levels of sulpher .

zinc/lead concentrate can be transported miles away from site via a slurry pipe and then dewatered to be fit for transporting to smelters. check out the century mine in australia just re opened after being closed down after decades of production.
australia has very high world class enviromental standards without a doubt and century are an open pit mine

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=32&v=cNYkXfUXVDU

in terms of strategy for HUM .....
i believe HUM are possibly funding BNKRs TSX listing costs , however i'm wondering why a very much American company choose to list on TSX.
it has been muted in past months a dual listing for hum was on the cards , could this not the vehicle hum have been looking for?
going forward the project looks robust and ready to go . crushing rocks with gold in is no different to crushing rocks with zinc in. it pretty much comes down to the bottom line at the end of the day nothing more nothing less.
so we have our mainstay of yanf with now three other options Cora , Dugbe and now BNKR . All of which given time should pay divdends for the patient HUM shareholder.

done some digging with bunker hill , i believe its a fairly decent deal . i do not share others views on how bad being involved with bunker hill. we own shares in hummingbird RESOURCES not hummingbird GOLD!
firstly as zinc only became prevalent i the 70's due use in galvanising car body manufacturing it was sort of a by product and disregarded as they were primarily after the lead back in the day. therefore the resource is large and of high quality.
yes the mine was shut in the 80's at a great expense to idaho state. therefore any effluent offtake from the mine is also controlled and dealt with by the state of idaho. the smelting would be taken care of off site and community is very supportive of startup of operations
the mine is relatively shallow and access by free steered vehicles FSV's , it will also be highly mechanised mining and in turn also very low cost in terms of extraction methods using room and pillar technique or block caving with very light use of roof bolting.
here's a couple of video's

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MVDAw56s5dU&t=68s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cd8UuSgVuwk

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r78sFMa5oos

anyone record it as i had a 5am airport drop off

Serhan Umurhan of ASO gets paid 687k , dan betts comes pretty cheap imo

tom kelly of EME is on 572k a year

parsons at sound gets paid £550k a year ,plus a VERY healthy options package , which he flogs every year apparently due to tax reasons

betts salary is comparable , even though to us mere mortal PI's is obscene

Defo massive positive, things happening on the ground now.

A big resource currently unaccounted for within the sp .

Well bt has been banned , within hours Perry starts posting from his self proclaimed exile . Not hard to work it out is it really , lots of alter egos here.
Now then I don’t mind healthy debate however trolling is what kills the debate, I put it to LSE that if they policed these boards and dealt with the total unreliability of this site then they would have be onto a winner.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3oB6ZA5SxOc

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iC1MZ6jzFao&feature=youtu.be

large buys here of 1m and a 420k , noticed a few chunky trades yesterday also

well DB did say we should hear something this year regards dugbe . could be a game changer , bringing in a major, part free carry possible back costs .
easier to negotiate with a few quid in the bank and a supportive lender ....may give them a few partners to consider for the absolute best deal for holders.
zero value right now for dugbe , any JV development plan would be ultra positive.

fundamentals fundamentals fundamentals

simple maths simple maths simple maths

long way to go yet but , right now this is cheap !

this line below suggest talks have already taken place and now is a real possibilty...........

'provides the tools to successfully conclude negotiations with potential joint-venture partners;

liking the Dugbe stuff , looks like its opening up for some sort of deal in the coming months.

partner comes in for a free carry for HUM say keep 30-40% ...should be transformational as ZERO pence is valued in IMO