Member Info for Littlepost

Ihadtocreatethis,

Totally agree. If it has/is being/will, be closed. Will we, and the market, be informed? And if so how?

TT, I think ihadtocreatethis, was referring to:-

Referral to ASIC:

When the ASX identifies suspicious trading or other potential breaches of market rules by a listed company, they can refer these matters to ASIC for a formal investigation.

Obviously there is no suggestion that this has/will happen and I doubt it will. But I'd like it formally signed off, that's all I'm saying.

TT, I'm not questioning the response. That was fine.

Your answering a question I didn't ask?

Thanks for all your replies

ihadtocreatethis, think TT is correct on this. Two different bodies one, the asx made contact, asic didn't. So board acted correctly.

TT. I'm not clear as to how that answers my question. As not being clear on the current situation is my issue.

Jiffybag, I didn't see that post but 'unusual ' again doesn't conclude the matter.

Irish24a, I'm fine with that, but would like some timescale.

Is it possible the Ausies are more concerned, don't see anything about it on here, about the outcome of the above?

Listing rule 3.1 "is not necessarily satisfied by answering the questions set out in this letter"

I've emailed ggp twice and asx once asking if the response satisfied rule 3.1 with no response from either.

I'd feel a lot easier if I knew this had been resolved/concluded.

I was under the misinterpretation that assays were price sensitive and therfore had to be released immediately to the market.

Just in case anyone thought the same, here are the facts:-

Gold mining companies are not legally required to release assay results at a specific time, but they typically do so after completing a drilling program or other exploration activity. The timing of release is often tied to the completion of lab analysis and the company's reporting schedule. Investors closely monitor these results as they provide an early indication of the potential value of a mineral deposit.

So keeping them for the quarterlies is fine.

Hi 96dc2,

I was thinking the same and have been tracking the:-

Asx close, aim open,Google open,aim close and Google close, via columns in that order.

Wow its all over the shop! Up,up,down,up,down etc or any variation of that.

But the pattern does suggest its the asx that's in front of the curve.

Up,up,up, so far today. So I'd say final 2 will finish up. I know that's stating what should be the obvious. But its the best start for a number of weeks.

Thanks Dip666.

I've just messaged ggp, a question, via their website page. I know some have said they have had responses from ggp previously. Could someone confirm is this is the way they made contact, and if so, how long did the reply take.

Thanks in advance.

Hi Wiltshireman,

Not saying I believe it,just posted as a matter of interest. In the article they do say talk of this could be beneficial to ggp sp recovery as it indicates evolution see ggps prospects. I think of it as a positive not negative.

Wiltshire man,

At least one aussie stocks publication has touted evolution as a possible acquirer of ggp. So knowing their financials may be of interest to some.

Trippy,

Both are informative posters (in this debate, I haven't read much from toby) and neither posted a disruptive post.

You say its fine to post rubbish, which is definitely what our to and from has been. I'm of the opposite view. So that's the last from me on this.

Trippy,

Element1 'gets it'. Just because you don't, don't try and discredit the opposing view.

I'll wear my ' usual suspect' rating as a badge of honour! Thanks

Toby,

Tippy is trying to surreptitiously discredit you. I wouldn't worry about it.

Your and Element1 discussion and opposing views has been conducted with respect and has Ben interesting and educational.

The phrase "they know not what they do" is a quote from the Bible, It generally refers to individuals acting without understanding the full consequences or implications of their actions, often due to ignorance,

confusion, or being carried away by a situation.

Pernickety,

Your assessment of the downturn is incorrect and misleading.

GGP still has great potential though.

Hi djm101,

Most of the late unknown trades would have been due to:-

Trades executed after a delay from the initial order can be difficult to classify accurately because the market conditions might have shifted.

Paulpatriot,

I'm absolutely sure! So I win!😝

Hi Element1,

I couldn't but then I only tried via barclays.

Do you think that the issue is:-

Most large trades are now orders (pre-agreed price) as posed to quote and deal (which is a lot more immediate and reacts to market action at the time) therefore driving the price up or down with more volatility?

Is it the mechanics of the cross listing which is actually making it appear that it controlled accumulation?

Just a theory.

No probs 👍